Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Andrew Steptoe a Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,
University College London, London WC1E 6BT, b Department of General
Practice and Primary Care, St George's Hospital Medical School, London
SW17 0RE Correspondence to: A
Steptoe a.steptoe{at}ucl.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To measure the effect of brief behavioural counselling in general practice on patients' consumption of fruit and
vegetables in adults from a low income population.
Design:
Parallel group randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Primary health centre in a deprived,
ethnically mixed inner city area.
Participants:
271 patients aged 18-70 years without
serious illness.
Intervention:
Brief individual behavioural
counselling based on the stage of change model; time matched nutrition
education counselling.
Main outcome measures:
Self reported number of
portions of fruit and vegetables eaten per day, plasma
carotene,
tocopherol, and ascorbic acid concentrations, and 24 hour urinary
potassium excretion. Assessment at baseline, eight weeks, and 12 months.
Results:
Consumption of fruit and vegetables
increased from baseline to 12 months by 1.5 and 0.9 portions per day in the behavioural and nutrition groups (mean difference 0.6 portions, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 1.1). The proportion of participants eating five or more portions a day increased by 42% and 27% in the
two groups (mean difference 15%, 3% to 28%). Plasma
carotene and
tocopherol concentrations increased in both groups, but the rise in
carotene was greater in the behavioural group (mean difference 0.16 µmol/l, 0.001 µmol/l to 1.34 µmol/l). There were no changes in
plasma ascorbic acid concentrations or urinary potassium excretion.
Differences were maintained when analysis was restricted to the 177 participants with incomes
£400 (
596, $640) a week.
Conclusions:
Brief individual counselling in primary
care can elicit sustained increases in consumption of fruit and
vegetables in low income adults in the general population.
|
What is already known on this topic
Biomarkers and intention to treat analyses have seldom been used in such interventions, and few studies have targeted low income populations What this study adds
Favourable effects were observed in low income adults living in a deprived inner city area |
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consumption of fruit and vegetables is thought to protect against
cancer and cardiovascular disease
1 2
but is inversely related to socioeconomic position. Previous research on increasing consumption has used individual, worksite, and community approaches to
intervention.3 Brief interventions can be
effective,4 but few studies have used intention to treat
analysis, and biomarkers have seldom been included.5 We
tested the hypothesis that brief behavioural counselling by nurses in
general practice would lead to increased consumption of fruit and
vegetables and to associated increases in plasma and urinary biomarkers
over a 12 month period in adults from a low income population compared
with time matched counselling based on nutrition education.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participants
This randomised parallel group trial compared brief nutrition
counselling with behavioural dietary counselling. Recruitment,
assessments, and interventions were carried out by research nurses in a
primary healthcare setting.
We randomly recruited by letter patients aged 18-70 years registered at
one primary health centre in a deprived inner city area with a Jarman
score of 40.3. We excluded individuals with serious illness and women
who were pregnant or who planned to become pregnant within the next 12 months. We did not exclude individuals taking vitamin supplements but
asked them to maintain a constant dose throughout the trial. After
several months of recruitment, it became evident that many participants
had relatively high incomes, suggesting that the study was attracting
more affluent residents. Invitations were therefore modified to
discourage people with a weekly income of more than £400 (
596,
$640) from volunteering.
In total 459 patients expressed interest in the study. After exclusions the sample consisted of 166 women and 105 men (see figure). From 25 June 1999 to 3 November 2001 a member of the research team who had no contact with participants individually randomised participants into one of two counselling conditions. There were 136 in the behavioural counselling group and 135 in the nutrition group.
Counselling methods
Each intervention was a 15 minute individual consultation,
carried out immediately after the baseline assessment. We prepared
written information to support the consultations, and participants
attended a second 15 minute consultation two weeks later. Eleven
participants (eight behavioural, three nutrition) did not attend the
second session. The target was to increase intake of fruit and
vegetables from baseline levels.
The nutrition counselling group received education about the importance of increasing consumption of fruit and vegetables, emphasising beneficial nutritional constituents and the way these act biologically to maintain health. The bioactive constituents of fruit and vegetables were described in lay terms, together with the range of effects that they have on bodily processes. The nurses emphasised the five a day message, established by the Department of Health.6 Behavioural counselling was founded on social learning theory and the stage of change model, which posits that the most appropriate methods of encouraging change in behaviour vary with the motivational readiness of the individual.7 Interventions were tailored to the individual, with personalised specific advice and setting of short and long term goals.
Methods of assessment
The main measure of consumption was a two item frequency
questionnaire adapted from previous research.
8 9
We asked
participants how many pieces of fruit and how many portions of
vegetables they ate on a typical day and gave them detailed information
about portion sizes.6 Potatoes were excluded, and one
serving of fruit juice was allowed. Patients also completed the dietary
instrument for nutrition education (DINE), a weighted food frequency
questionnaire that accounts for most fat and fibre in the typical UK
diet.10 Blood pressure was measured after the participant
had been sitting for 10 minutes.
We assessed biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake to determine
whether counselling interventions had effects not only on reported
consumption but also on potential biological mediators of health
effects. Non-fasting blood samples were stored at
70°C until the
end of the trial and analysed for plasma ascorbic acid (vitamin C),
tocopherol (vitamin E), and
carotene. We collected 24 hour urine
samples for the measurement of potassium excretion.
We devised a stage of change questionnaire that gauged participants' readiness to increase consumption at the start of the study, irrespective of whether they had made changes in the past. They were classified as precontemplators (no intention of changing behaviour), as contemplators (seriously thinking about changing behaviour), or as in the preparation stage (planning to change behaviour within the next month).
Our primary end points were changes in self reported intake of
fruit and vegetables (number of portions per day and the proportion of
individuals who increased intake to five a day) and changes in
biomarkers (plasma
carotene,
tocopherol, and ascorbic acid concentrations, and 24 hour urinary excretion of potassium and urinary
potassium: creatinine ratio). The secondary end points were changes
in body weight, body mass index, blood pressure, total plasma
cholesterol concentration, and DINE measures.
Statistical methods
We intended to investigate only low income adults, but some higher
income volunteers also took part. We therefore separately carried out
analyses on the complete sample and on the lower income category. The
criterion for the definition of lower income was less than £400 a
week. One hundred and ten people (81%) in the behavioural counselling
and 108 (80%) in the nutrition counselling groups completed the 12 month follow up (figure). The trial was analysed on an intention to
treat basis..
|
We calculated scores indicating the change between 12 months and baseline, so a positive value indicates a beneficial change in fruit and vegetable consumption and in biomarkers. We have presented these scores with 95% confidence intervals adjusted for possible confounders.
We had data on consumption from all 271 participants, plasma
carotene from 268,
tocopherol from 266, and vitamin C from 265. Urine samples were obtained from 225 participants, but four individuals
did not collect the full amount for the 24 hour period.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The baseline characteristics of participants in the two groups were the same. The average age was 43 years; 68% were in the low income category; over a third were receiving benefits, and less than a half owned their own homes. The sample was ethnically mixed. A third were cigarette smokers, and nearly one third were taking vitamin supplements. As expected, many (55%) participants were in the preparation stage of change; a quarter were precontemplators, and a fifth contemplators.
The mean number of portions of fruit and vegetables eaten daily
(excluding potatoes) was 3.6 at baseline, and a fifth of the participants were eating at least five portions a day (table 1). Both
groups increased the number of portions consumed a day. After adjustment for covariates, the increase was greater in the behavioural counselling than in the nutrition counselling group (mean difference 0.62 portions, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 1.13). The increase in
the number eating five or more portions a day was also greater in the
behavioural group (difference 15%, 3% to 28%). Plasma
carotene
and
tocopherol concentrations increased in both groups, with no
changes in plasma ascorbic acid concentration or potassium excretion.
The increase in
carotene was greater in the behavioural group
(difference 0.16 µmol/l, 0.001 µmol/l to 1.34 µmol/l).
|
Results were largely replicated when we restricted the analysis to the
lower income participants (table 2). The increase in the number of
portions was twice as great in the behavioural than in the nutrition
groups, and the behavioural group also showed larger increases in
plasma
carotene concentration (difference 0.18 µmol/l, 0.02 µmol/l to 0.37 µmol/l). In addition, there was also a more positive
change in potassium:creatinine ratio in the behavioural group
(difference 0.48, 0.01 to 0.95).
|
There were no changes in body weight, body mass index, blood pressure,
or serum cholesterol, either in the complete sample or the lower income
participants. DINE scores for fat consumption fell in both groups,
while fibre intake increased slightly in the behavioural group only,
but there were no significant differences between the groups in these measures.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brief counselling carried out by nurses in primary care can result
in marked increases in reported fruit and vegetable consumption in an
ethnically mixed sample. The average increase in the group assigned to
behavioural counselling (1.5 portions per day) was similar to the
increase seen in a six month study in more affluent participants (1.4 portions).5 We did not expect such a large increase in the
nutrition counselling group, but the mean rise of 0.87 portions per day
was similar to that observed in studies with more active
interventions.4 This indicates that the nutrition counselling programme was not an inactive control procedure but itself
had substantive effects. We do not know whether changes would have
taken place in the absence of any professional advice because we did
not have a control group in which no counselling took place. The
beneficial effects of brief counselling were endorsed by positive
changes in
carotene and
tocopherol concentrations.
The observed changes in consumption were similar when we restricted analysis to participants with lower incomes. The implication is that individual counselling in primary care may be an effective means of increasing consumption in less affluent adults, so targeting low income groups may help redress social inequalities in health.
Representativeness of the sample
We recruited participants from a primary care centre in a low
income neighbourhood, but only a small proportion (12%) responded to
our invitations. We had no information about the eating habits or
income of non-participants. The demands of the study were onerous,
involving three blood samples and three 24 hour urine collections, and
this may have discouraged potential participants.
The average fruit and vegetable intake of 3.64 portions a day is comparable with the mean intake of 3.85 in the 1999 national food survey.11 About 24% reported eating at least five portions a day, compared with 26% in the 2000 consumer attitudes survey.12 Participants were not therefore remarkable with respect to fruit and vegetable intake before the study.
Variations in biomarker response
We did not record any changes in plasma ascorbic acid
concentration. The explanation is not clear. The recent study in Oxford
reported small increases in ascorbic acid in their intervention group
at six months but from baseline concentrations that were much lower
(34.4 µmol) than those of the present study (75 µmol/l).5 The results for potassium excretion were also
disappointing. Although there was difference between groups in changes
in potassium:creatinine ratio in the low income sample, analyses of the
complete sample showed no overall effects. The pattern of changes in
biomarkers may have arisen from the specific food choices made by participants.
Limitations and implications
Although we complied with the CONSORT recommendations for
parallel group randomised trials, we could not blind researchers to
group assignment. Quality control of counselling sessions was built
into the study. Nevertheless, it would have been preferable (had
resources allowed) if the nurses administering the intervention had not
been involved in assessments.
Our findings show that brief individual counselling in primary care can elicit sustained increases in consumption of fruit and vegetables, corroborated by biomarkers. Both nutrition and behavioural counselling stimulated increases in consumption, but the changes were greater with behaviourally oriented methods. Our techniques would be feasible in primary care, and they could be adapted for group administration. However, we do not know how effective they would be if applied by practice nurses outside the research setting.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge the help of Martin Lipscombe in data collection and thank Rosie Savage and staff and patients at the Falcon Road Health Centre for their cooperation.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Grant 121695 from the Department of Health/Medical Research Council Nutrition Programme. The guarantor accepts full responsibility for the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethical approval: Wandsworth local research ethics committee approved the study, and all participants gave signed consent.
This is an abridged version; the
full version is on bmj.com
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ness AR, Powles JW.
Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review.
Int J Epidemiol
1997;
26:
1-13 |
| 2. | Working Group on Diet and Cancer, Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy. Nutritional aspects of the development of cancer (48). Department of Health report on health and social subjects. London: Stationery Office, 1998. |
| 3. | Bowen DJ, Beresford SA. Dietary interventions to prevent disease. Ann Rev Public Health 2002; 23: 255-286[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 4. | Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohr KN, Hersey J. The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med 2002; 35: 25-41[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 5. | John JH, Ziebland S, Yudkin P, Roe LS, Neil HAW. Effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on plasma antioxidant concentrations and blood pressure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1969-1974[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 6. | Department of Health. Five-a-day programme. www.doh.gov.uk/fiveaday (accessed 3 February 2003). |
| 7. | Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 38-48[ISI][Medline]. |
| 8. | Wardle J, Parmenter K, Waller J. Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite 2000; 34: 269-275[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 9. | Cappuccio FP, Rink E, Perkins-Porras L, Mc Kay C, Hilton S, Steptoe A. Estimation of fruit and vegetable intake using a two-item dietary questionnaire: a potential tool for primary health care workers. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis (in press). |
| 10. |
Roe L, Strong C, Whiteside C, Neil A, Mant D.
Dietary interventions in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment.
Fam Pract
1994;
11:
375-381 |
| 11. | Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. National food survey 1999. London: Stationery Office, 2000. |
| 12. | COI Communications and Food Standards Agency. Consumer attitudes to food standards. London: Taylor Nelson Sofres, 2001. |
(Accepted 6 February 2003)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+