General practice

Low income scheme index: a new deprivation scale based on prescribing in general practice

^a Prescribing Research Unit, Leeds University Research School of Medicine, Leeds LS2 9NZ

Correspondence to: Professor Harris.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe and validate a new deprivation index, based on the percentage of prescribed items exempt from the prescription charge under the low income scheme, at both family health services authority and practice level.
Design: Comparison of the index with three other deprivation indices and correlation of index values with the use of drugs given for conditions with known social class gradients.
Setting: All 90 family health services authorities and 7619/9289 practices in England.
Results: The ranking of family health services authorities on the new index correlated highly with rankings on the other indices. Values in relation to the use of drugs given for conditions with known social class gradients were in the predicted direction at both family health services authority level and practice level; correlation was highly significant at the authority level, but less significant at practice level.
Conclusions: The new index provides a good measure of deprivation at family health services authority level, and at practice level the results are sufficiently encouraging to warrant further research. It provides the best available instrument for relating deprivation to the use of drugs in any population that can be defined by prescribing data, but an attempt to use it in determining allocation of resources would at this stage be premature.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Proposed new deprivation index

Nicky Britten, Mel Bartley, and David Blane
BMJ 1995 310: 1067-1068. [Extract] [Full Text]

Poor correlation with Jarman index may be due to changes in deprivation since 1981

R S James
BMJ 1995 310: 1068. [Extract] [Full Text]

May perpetuate variation in prescribing unrelated to patients' need

Sarah J Roberts
BMJ 1995 310: 1068. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ward, P R, Noyce, P R, St Leger, A S (2004). Are GP practice prescribing rates for coronary heart disease drugs equitable? A cross sectional analysis in four primary care trusts in England. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 89-96 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Watkins, C., Moore, L., Harvey, I., Carthy, P., Robinson, E., Brawn, R. (2003). Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study. BMJ 326: 1178-1179 [Full text]  
• Watkins, C, Harvey, I, Carthy, P, Moore, L, Robinson, E, Brawn, R (2003). Attitudes and behaviour of general practitioners and their prescribing costs: a national cross sectional survey. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 29-34 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Howard, A. J., Magee, J. T., Fitzgerald, K. A., Dunstan, F. D. J. (2001). Factors associated with antibiotic resistance in coliform organisms from community urinary tract infection in Wales. J Antimicrob Chemother 47: 305-313 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ryle, C A, Thick, T. (2000). Allocating prescribing budgets. BMJ 321: 113-113 [Full text]  
• Pirmohamed, M., Brown, C., Owens, L., Luke, C., Gilmore, I.T., Breckenridge, A.M., Park, B.K. (2000). The burden of alcohol misuse on an inner-city general hospital. QJM 93: 291-295 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Davis, H., Day, C., Cox, A., Cutler, L. (2000). Child and Adolescent Mental Health Needs Assessment and Service Implications in an Inner City Area. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 5: 169-188 [Abstract]  
• Rice, N., Dixon, P., Lloyd, D. C E F, Roberts, D., Cole, T J (2000). Derivation of a needs based capitation formula for allocating prescribing budgets to health authorities and primary care groups in England: regression analysis • Commentary: The emphasis on transparency weakens the formula. BMJ 320: 284-288 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wilson, R. P H, Hatcher, J., Barton, S., Walley, T. (1996). Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ 313: 595-599 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Scrivener, G., Lloyd, D. C (1996). Allocating census data to general practice populations. BMJ 312: 249b-249 [Full text]  
• Wilson, R. P H, Buchan, I., Walley, T (1995). Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study. BMJ 311: 1347-1350 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Crayford, T., Shanks, J., Bajekal, M., Langford, S. (1995). Analysis from inner London of deprivation payments based on enumeration districts rather than wards. BMJ 311: 787-788 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• James, R S (1995). Poor correlation with Jarman index may be due to changes in deprivation since 1981. BMJ 310: 1068-1068 [Full text]  
• Britten, N., Bartley, M., Blane, D. (1995). Proposed new deprivation index. BMJ 310: 1067c-1068 [Full text]  
• Roberts, S. J (1995). May perpetuate variation in prescribing unrelated to patients' need. BMJ 310: 1068a-1068 [Full text]