BMJ 1995;311:1137-1139 (28 October)

General practice

Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice

Andrew Dicker, general practitioner,a David Armstrong, reader in sociology as applied to medicine b

a 93 Cambridge Street, London SW1V 4PY, b Department of Public Health Medicine, United Medical and Dental School of Guy's and St Thomas's, Guy's Campus, London SE1 9RT

Correspondence to: Dr Dicker.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the assumptions underlying consumers' responses to questions of resource priorities in the NHS.
Design: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with a heterogeneous sample of 16 patients drawn from a general practice.
Results: Interviewees were not persuaded that they had a legitimate role to play in the prioritisation of services. They supported the principle of equity and were reluctant to use their own personal needs as a basis for resource allocation; instead they argued from what they perceived to be the needs of others.
Conclusions: Paradoxically, surveys of consumers' views on health care priorities probably do not elicit the personal ideas of respondents but tap into a more general ideological position closer to an earlier collectivist notion of health care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sampietro-Colom, L., Espallargues, M., Rodriguez, E., Comas, M., Alonso, J., Castells, X., Pinto, J.L. (2008). Wide Social Participation in Prioritizing Patients on Waiting Lists for Joint Replacement: A Conjoint Analysis. Med Decis Making 28: 554-566 [Abstract]  
  • Werntoft, E., Hallberg, I. R, Edberg, A.-K. (2007). Older People's Reasoning About Age-Related Prioritization in Health Care. Nurs Ethics 14: 399-412 [Abstract]  
  • Campbell, J L, Ramsay, J, Green, J (2001). Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care. Qual Saf Health Care 10: 90-95 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board, T. (2000). Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. Hum Reprod 15: 330-334 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dolan, P., Cookson, R., Ferguson, B. (1999). Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ 318: 916-919 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stronks, K., Strijbis, A.-M., Wendte, J. F, Gunning-Schepers, L. J (1997). Who should decide? Qualitative analysis of panel data from public, patients, healthcare professionals, and insurers on priorities in health care. BMJ 315: 92-96 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Smith, R. (1996). Rationing health care: moving the debate forward. BMJ 312: 1553-1554 [Full text]  
  • Perry, S. (1996). Patients' views of priority setting. BMJ 312: 447-447 [Full text]  



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview