BMJ 1995;311:1340-1343 (18 November)

Papers

Prospective observational study to assess value of prostate specific antigen as screening test for prostate cancer

Carol Parkes, lecturer,a Nicholas J Wald, professor,a Philip Murphy, computer programmer,a Lynne George, laboratory research coordinator,a Hilary C Watt, statistician,a Roger Kirby, consultant urologist,b Paul Knekt, laboratory director,c K J Helzlsouer, associate professor,d J Tuomilehto, research professor e

a Cancer Research Campaign Cancer Screening Group, Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1M 6BQ, b Department of Urology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, c Department of Health and Disability, National Public Health Institute and Social Insurance Institution, Research and Development Unit, Helsinki, Finland, d Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Training Center for Public Health Research, Washington County Health Department, MD 21742-2067, United States, e Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence to: Professor Wald.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate measurement of serum prostate specific antigen as a potential screening test for future clinical prostate cancer among healthy men.
Design: Nested case-control study with stored serum samples collected from 49261 men with follow up using national death and cancer registration systems.
Subjects: 265 asymptomatic men who subsequently developed clinical prostate cancer and 1055 controls matched for age, study centre, and duration of storage of samples.
Main outcome measures: Distribution of concentrations of the antigen in men who developed prostate cancer and in controls.
Results: Prostate specific antigen concentrations were significantly higher in men who subsequently developed prostate cancer than in controls. In the first three years after blood collection the median concentration was 23 times greater in cases than in controls of the same age at the same centre (that is, 23 multiples of the median). A smaller difference persisted thereafter; 4.0 multiples of the median 3-6 years after blood collection, 3.6 6-10 years, and 1.8 after 10 years. In the first three years the proportion of men who developed prostate cancer and had raised levels of the antigen (>/=12 multiples of the median) (detection rate or sensitivity) was 81% (95% confidence interval 54% to 96%). The proportion of men who did not develop prostate cancer but had levels this high (false positive rate) was only 0.5%.
Conclusion: Prostate specific antigen measurement is a highly discriminatory screening test for prostate cancer among healthy men. In the general population, 60-74 year old men who had >/=12 times the normal median level would have about a 50% chance of developing clinical prostate cancer in the next three years. Measurement of this antigen is a good enough screening test to justify a randomised controlled trial to determine any reduction in mortality from prostate cancer.
.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key messages
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Until now few data have been available to evaluate the performance of
prostate specific antigen as a potential screening test for prostate cancer
among healthy men

* In a study of 49261 healthy men the measurement of this antigen identified
four out of every five men who developed clinical prostate cancer over the
next three years with a false positive rate of only 0.5%

* Concentrations were raised for over 10 years before prostate cancer
presented clinically

* Men aged 60-74 years with a serum prostate concentration greater than or
equal to 12 times the normal median have about a 50% chance of developing
clinical prostate cancer over the next three years

* Measurement of prostate specific antigen is a good enough screening
test to justify a randomised controlled trial to determine whether screening
can lead to a reduction in mortality from prostate cancer and if so to what
extent



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Janssen, J. A. M. J. L., Wildhagen, M. F., Ito, K., Blijenberg, B. G., van Schaik, R. H. N., Roobol, M. J., Pols, H. A. P., Lamberts, S. W. J., Schroder, F. H. (2004). Circulating Free Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I , Total IGF-I, and IGF Binding Protein-3 Levels Do Not Predict the Future Risk to Develop Prostate Cancer: Results of a Case-Control Study Involving 201 Patients within a Population-Based Screening with a 4-Year Interval. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89: 4391-4396 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van der Cruijsen-Koeter, I. W., van der Kwast, T. H., Schroder, F. H. (2003). Interval Carcinomas in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)-Rotterdam. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 1462-1466 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Warren, P. (1996). Measurement of prostate specific antigen as screening test for prostate cancer. BMJ 312: 708c-709 [Full text]  
  • Sandhu, S, Morris, R, Matveev, V, Kaisary, A V (1996). Trials of treatment are needed before trials of screening. BMJ 312: 709a-709 [Full text]  
  • Bartlett, W A, Jones, A F (1996). Measurement presents technical difficulties. BMJ 312: 709b-709 [Full text]  



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview