BMJ 1996;313:270-272 (3 August)

General practice

Prescribing injectable and oral methadone to opiate addicts: results from the 1995 national postal survey of community pharmacies in England and Wales

John Strang, professor of the addictions,a Janie Sheridan, research pharmacist,a Nick Barber, professor of the practice of pharmacy b

a National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry and Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AF, b School of Pharmacy, London WC1N 1AX

Correspondence to: Professor Strang.

Abstract

Objective: To establish the extent of prescribing injectable and oral methadone to opiate addicts and the practice characteristics and dispensing arrangements attached to these prescriptions.
Design: National survey of 25% random sample of community (high street) pharmacies through postal questionnaire, with four mailings.
Setting: England and Wales.
Subjects: 1 in 4 sample of all 10 616 community pharmacies, stratified by family health services authority.
Main outcome measures: Data were collected on each prescription for controlled drugs currently being dispensed by pharmacies to misusers, describing the drug, form, dose, source (general practice or hospital; and NHS or private), and numbers of dispensing pick ups a week.
Results: Methadone was the opiate most commonly dispensed to misusers (96.0% of 3846 opiate prescriptions). 79.6% of methadone prescriptions were for the oral liquid form, 11.0% for tablet, and 9.3% for injectable ampoules. More than one third of all methadone prescriptions were for weekly or fortnightly pick up, with a further third being for daily pick up. Tablets and ampoules were even less likely to be dispensed on a daily basis. Private prescriptions were significantly more likely than NHS ones to be for tablets or ampoules, to be for substantially higher daily doses, and to be collected on a weekly or fortnightly basis.
Conclusions: The distinctively British practice of prescribing injectable methadone was found to be widespread and, contrary to guidance, to be as prevalent in non-specialist as specialist settings. In view of the frequent crushing and injecting of methadone tablets, clearer more authoritative guidance is needed on the contexts in which injectable methadone (tablets as well as ampoules) should be prescribed and on the responsibilities for monitoring and supervision which should be attached.

Key messages

  • Tablets and ampoules make up one fifth of methadone prescriptions

  • Arrangements already exist for daily dispensing of methadone to patients, but many prescribers (particularly general practitioners and private doctors) prescribe large amounts with long intervals between pick ups

  • As well as ampoules, methadone tablets (when crushed) may be injected; clearer guidance is needed on the clinical criteria for prescribing injectable methadone

  • Daily dispensing arrangements are insufficiently used, and guidelines for pre- scribers on dispensing arrangements need to be reviewed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Treatment in general practice can be successful
Chris Ford and Brian Whitehead
BMJ 1996 313: 1481-1482. [Extract] [Full Text]

Clinical judgment is important
Colin Brewer and Catherine Neill
BMJ 1996 313: 1482. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • White, R., Shearman, L. (2008). Injectable opiate prescribing in Cornwall. Psychiatr. Bull. 32: 387-390 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Morgan, O., Griffiths, C., Hickman, M. (2006). Association between availability of heroin and methadone and fatal poisoning in England and Wales 1993-2004. Int J Epidemiol 35: 1579-1585 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Strang, J., Sheridan, J. (2003). Effect of national guidelines on prescription of methadone: analysis of NHS prescription data, England 1990-2001. BMJ 327: 321-322 [Full text]  
  • Dunn, J. (2003). A survey of methadone prescribing at an inner-city drug service and a comparison with national data. Psychiatr. Bull. 27: 167-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Myton, T., Fletcher, K. (2003). Descriptive study of the effects of altering formulation of prescribed methadone from injectable to oral. Psychiatr. Bull. 27: 3-6 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fiellin, D. A., O'Connor, P. G. (2002). Office-Based Treatment of Opioid-Dependent Patients. NEJM 347: 817-823 [Full text]  
  • Milroy, C M, Forrest, A R W (2000). Methadone deaths: a toxicological analysis. J. Clin. Pathol. 53: 277-281 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Matheson, C., Bond, C. M, Hickey, F. (1999). Prescribing and dispensing for drug misusers in primary care: current practice in Scotland. Fam Pract 16: 375-379 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Day, E, Kahn, A, Georgiou, G (1999). Misusers may receive methadone from drug centres and GPs simultaneously. BMJ 318: 395a-395 [Full text]  
  • Strang, J., Sheridan, J. (1998). Effect of government recommendations on methadone prescribing in south east England: comparison of 1995 and 1997 surveys. BMJ 317: 1489-1490 [Full text]  
  • (1997). Helping patients who misuse drugs. DTB 35: 18-22 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Calman, L., Finch, E., Powis, B., Strang, J. (1996). Only half of patients store methadone in safe place. BMJ 313: 1481-1481 [Full text]  
  • Brewer, C., Neill, C. (1996). Clinical judgment is important. BMJ 313: 1482-1482 [Full text]  
  • Robertson, J R, Macleod, J (1996). Methadone treatment. BMJ 313: 1480c-1481 [Full text]  
  • Ford, C., Whitehead, B. (1996). Treatment in general practice can be successful. BMJ 313: 1481b-1482 [Full text]  
  • Sorensen, J. L (1996). Methadone treatment for opiate addicts. BMJ 313: 245-246 [Full text]  



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview