BMJ 1996;313:841-844 (5 October)

Papers

Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys

Geoff Cohen, lecturer in medical statistics,a John Forbes, senior lecturer in health economics,a Michael Garraway, professor of public health a

a Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG

Correspondence to: Mr Cohen.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the consistency of survey estimates of patient satisfaction with interpersonal aspects of hospital experience.
Design: Interview and postal surveys, evidence from three independent population surveys being compared.
Setting: Scotland and Lothian.
Subjects: Randomly selected members of the general adult population who had received hospital care in the past 12 months.
Main outcome measures: Percentages of respondents dissatisfied with aspects of patient care.
Results: For items covering respect for privacy, treatment with dignity, sensitivity to feelings, treatment as an individual, and clear explanation of care there was good agreement among the surveys despite differences in wording. But for items to do with being encouraged and given time to ask questions and being listened to by doctors there was substantial disagreement.
Conclusions: Evidence regarding levels of patient dissatisfaction from national or local surveys should be calibrated against evidence from other surveys to improve reliability. Some important aspects of patient satisfaction seem to have been reliably estimated by surveys of all Scottish NHS users commissioned by the management executive, but certain questions may have underestimated the extent of dissatisfaction, possibly as a result of choice of wording.

Key messages

  • High levels of satisfaction with regard to personal treatment by hospital staff, involvement in decisions, and communication with doctors have been reported in successive interview surveys in Scotland

  • Levels of satisfaction with doctor-patient com- munication and involvement in decisions are sensi- tive to changes in wording

  • Asking patients if they agree with a negative description of their hospital experience tends to produce greater apparent satisfaction than asking if they agree with a positive description


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Moret, L., Nguyen, J.-M., Volteau, C., Falissard, B., Lombrail, P., Gasquet, I. (2007). Evidence of a non-linear influence of patient age on satisfaction with hospital care. Int J Qual Health Care 19: 382-389 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Taylor, S, Eldridge, S, Chang, Y-M, Sohanpal, R, Clarke, A (2007). Evaluating hospital at home and early discharge schemes for patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Chronic Respiratory Disease 4: 33-43 [Abstract]  
  • Wilson, A, Hewitt, G, Matthews, R, Richards, S H, Shepperd, S (2006). Development and testing of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with intermediate care.. Qual Saf Health Care 15: 314-319 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Brouwers, E. P. M., Terluin, B., Tiemens, B. G., Verhaak, P. F. M. (2006). Patients with Minor Mental Disorders Leading to Sickness Absence: A Feasibility Study for Social Workers' Participation in a Treatment Programme. Br J Soc Work 36: 127-138 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Johnson, A., Sandford, J. (2005). Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review. Health Educ Res 20: 423-429 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Durieux, P, Bissery, A, Dubois, S, Gasquet, I, Coste, J (2004). Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 198-202 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chalmers, J., Muir, R. (2003). Patient privacy and confidentiality. BMJ 326: 725-726 [Full text]  
  • Wilkinson, E K, Salisbury, C, Bosanquet, N, Franks, P J, Kite, S, Lorentzon, M, Naysmith, A (1999). Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 13: 197-216 [Abstract]  
  • Gavin, K. T, Turner, M. J, Fielding, R., Hedley, A., Cheang, J., Lee, A. (1997). Methods of surveying patients' satisfaction. BMJ 314: 227-227 [Full text]  
  • Delbanco, T. L (1996). Quality of care through the patient's eyes. BMJ 313: 832-833 [Full text]  



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview