Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Richard Grol a Centre for Quality of
Care Research, Universities of Nijmegen-Maastricht, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands, b Dutch College of General Practitioners, PO Box 3231, 3502 GE Utrecht, Netherlands, c Department of
General Practice, Utrecht University, PO Box 80045, 3508 TA Utrecht
Correspondence to: Professor Grol rgrol{at}hsu.kun.nl
Objective: To determine which attributes of clinical
practice guidelines influence the use of guidelines in decision making
in clinical practice.
Design: Observational study relating the use of 47 different recommendations from 10 national clinical guidelines to 12 different attributes of clinical guidelines
for example, evidence
based, controversial, concrete.
Setting: General practice in the Netherlands.
Subjects: 61 general practitioners who made 12 880
decisions in their contacts with patients.
Main outcome measures: Compliance of decisions with
clinical guidelines according to the attribute of the guideline.
Results: Recommendations were followed in, on
average, 61% (7915/12 880) of the decisions. Controversial
recommendations were followed in 35% (886/2497) of decisions and
non-controversial recommendations in 68% (7029/10 383) of decisions.
Vague and non-specific recommendations were followed in 36% (826/2280)
of decisions and clear recommendations in 67% (7089/10 600) of
decisions. Recommendations that demanded a change in existing practice
routines were followed in 44% (1278/2912) of decisions and those that
did not in 67% (6637/9968) of decisions. Evidence based
recommendations were used more than recommendations for practice that
were not based on research evidence (71% (2745/3841) v
57% (5170/9039)).
Conclusions: People and organisations setting
evidence based clinical practice guidelines should take into account
some of the other important attributes of effective recommendations for
clinical practice.
Key messages
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+