Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Georgina Stamp a Centre for Research into Nursing and
Health Care, University of South Australia and North Western Adelaide
Health Service, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia, b Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA
5006, c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of
Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide
Correspondence to: G Stamp georgie.stamp{at}unisa.edu.au
Objective:
To determine the effects of perineal
massage in the second stage of labour on perineal outcomes.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Participants:
At 36 weeks' gestation, women expecting
normal birth of a singleton were asked to join the study. Women became eligible to be randomised in labour if they progressed to full dilatation of the cervix or 8 cm or more if nulliparous or 5 cm or more
if multiparous. 1340 were randomised into the trial.
Intervention:
Massage and stretching of the perineum
during the second stage of labour with a water soluble lubricant.
Main outcome measures:
Primary outcomes: rates
of intact perineum, episiotomies, and first, second, third, and fourth
degree tears. Secondary outcomes: pain at three and 10 days postpartum
and pain, dyspareunia, resumption of sexual intercourse, and urinary
and faecal incontinence and urgency three months postpartum.
Results:
Rates of intact perineums, first and second degree tears, and episiotomies were similar in the massage and the
control groups. There were fewer third degree tears in the massage
group (12 (1.7%) v 23 (3.6%); absolute risk 2.11, relative risk 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.93, P<0.04),
though the trial was underpowered to measure this rarer outcome. Groups did not differ in any of the secondary outcomes at the three assessment points.
Conclusions:
The practice of perineal massage in
labour does not increase the likelihood of an intact perineum or reduce the risk of pain, dyspareunia, or urinary and faecal problems.
Perineal trauma during vaginal birth and its sequelae, including
urinary and faecal incontinence, dyspareunia, and persistent pain, have
a negative impact on the sexuality, self esteem, and quality of life of
countless women each year
Perineal massage in the second stage of labour did not have any effect
on the likelihood of an intact perineum, perineal trauma, pain, or
subsequent sexual, urinary or faecal outcomes but was not
harmful
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+