Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John W Ely a Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa
College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA, b Praxis Press, New York, NY
10010, USA, c Department of Family Practice, Michigan State University, East
Lansing, MI 48824, USA, d Moses Cone Hospital Family Medicine Residency,
Greensboro, NC 27401, USA, e University of Missouri-Columbia School of
Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212, USA, f Division of General Internal
Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Correspondence to: J W Ely john-ely{at}uiowa.edu
Objective:
To describe the obstacles encountered when attempting to answer doctors' questions with evidence.
What is already known on this topic
Studies have not defined the obstacles to answering questions in a
systematic manner A comprehensive description of such obstacles has not been presented What this study adds
The obstacles were comprehensively described and organised
Design:
Qualitative study.
Setting:
General practices in Iowa.
Participants:
9 academic generalist doctors, 14 family
doctors, and 2 medical librarians.
Main outcome measure:
A taxonomy of obstacles
encountered while searching for evidence based answers to doctors' questions.
Results:
59 obstacles were encountered and organised according to the five steps in asking and answering questions: recognise a gap in knowledge, formulate a question, search for relevant
information, formulate an answer, and use the answer to direct patient
care. Six obstacles were considered particularly salient by the
investigators and practising doctors: the excessive time required to
find information; difficulty modifying the original question, which was
often vague and open to interpretation; difficulty selecting an optimal
strategy to search for information; failure of a seemingly appropriate
resource to cover the topic; uncertainty about how to know when all the
relevant evidence has been found so that the search can stop; and
inadequate synthesis of multiple bits of evidence into a clinically
useful statement.
Conclusions:
Many obstacles are encountered when
asking and answering questions about how to care for patients.
Addressing these obstacles could lead to better patient care by
improving clinically oriented information resources.
Doctors are encouraged to search for evidence based answers to their
questions about patient care but most go unanswered
Fifty nine obstacles were found while attempting to answer clinical
questions with evidence; six were particularly salient
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+