Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jill P Pell a Department of
Medical Cardiology, University of Glasgow, G31 2ER, b Scottish
Ambulance Service Headquarters, Edinburgh EH10 5UU, c Robertson
Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ
Correspondence
to: Stuart M Cobbe stuart.cobbe{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Objective:
To estimate the potential impact of public access defibrillators on overall survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest.
What is already known on this topic
Defibrillation is an independent predictor of survival from out of
hospital cardiac arrest The probability of a rhythm being amenable to defibrillation declines
with time Interest in providing public access defibrillators to reduce the time
to defibrillation has been growing, but their potential impact on
overall survival is unknown What this study adds
Arrests that occur in sites suitable for locating defibrillators
already have the best profile in terms of ambulance response time, use
of defibrillation, and survival of the patient Public access defibrillators are less likely to increase survival than
expansion of first responder defibrillation or bystander
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Design:
Retrospective cohort study using data from an
electronic register. A statistical model was used to estimate the
effect on survival of placing public access defibrillators at suitable
or possibly suitable sites.
Setting:
Scottish Ambulance Service.
Subjects:
Records of all out of hospital cardiac
arrests due to heart disease in Scotland in 1991-8.
Main outcome measures:
Observed and predicted
survival to discharge from hospital.
Results:
Of 15 189 arrests, 12 004 (79.0%)
occurred in sites not suitable for the location of public access
defibrillators, 453 (3.0%) in sites where they may be suitable, and
2732 (18.0%) in suitable sites. Defibrillation was given in 67.9% of
arrests that occurred in possibly suitable sites for locating
defibrillators and in 72.9% of arrests that occurred in suitable
sites. Compared with an actual overall survival of 744 (5.0%), the
predicted survival with public access defibrillators ranged from 942 (6.3%) to 959 (6.5%), depending on the assumptions made regarding
defibrillator coverage.
Conclusions:
The predicted increase in survival from
targeted provision of public access defibrillators is less than the
increase achievable through expansion of first responder defibrillation to non-ambulance personnel, such as police or firefighters, or of
bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Additional resources for wide
scale coverage of public access defibrillators are probably not
justified by the marginal improvement in survival.
Three quarters of all deaths from acute coronary events occur before
the patient reaches a hospital
Most arrests occur in sites unsuitable for locating public access
defibrillators
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+