Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
C Raina Elley a Department of General Practice and Primary
Health Care, University of Auckland, New Zealand, b Department of Community Health, University of
Auckland
Correspondence to: C Raina Elley
c.elley{at}auckland.ac.nz
Objective:
To assess the long term effectiveness of
the "green prescription" programme, a clinician based initiative in general practice that provides counselling on physical activity.
What is already known on this topic
What this study adds
The intervention may reduce blood pressure by an average of 1-2 mm Hg
over 12 months No changes in the risk of coronary heart disease were
observed The intervention is sustainable in usual general practice Prompting practice staff to deliver the intervention may have increased
its effectiveness
Design:
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Practices were randomised before systematic screening and recruitment
of patients.
Setting:
42 rural and urban general practices in one region of New Zealand.
Subjects:
All sedentary 40-79 year old patients
visiting their general practitioner during the study's recruitment period.
Intervention:
General practitioners were prompted by
the patient to give oral and written advice on physical activity during usual consultations. Exercise specialists continued support by telephone and post. Control patients received usual care.
Main outcome measures:
Change in physical activity,
quality of life (as measured by the "short form 36" (SF-36)
questionnaire), cardiovascular risk (Framingham and D'Agostino
equations), and blood pressure over a 12 month period.
Results:
74% (117/159) of general practitioners and 66% (878/1322) of screened eligible patients participated in the study. The follow up rate was 85% (750/878). Mean total energy expenditure increased by 9.4 kcal/kg/week (P=0.001) and leisure exercise by 2.7 kcal/kg/week (P=0.02) or 34 minutes/week more in the
intervention group than in the control group (P=0.04). The proportion
of the intervention group undertaking 2.5 hours/week of leisure
exercise increased by 9.72% (P=0.003) more than in the control group
(number needed to treat=10.3). SF-36 measures of self rated
"general health," "role physical," "vitality," and "bodily pain" improved significantly more in the intervention group
(P<0.05). A trend towards decreasing blood pressure became apparent
but no significant difference in four year risk of coronary heart disease.
Conclusion:
Counselling patients in general practice
on exercise is effective in increasing physical activity and improving quality of life over 12 months.
Counselling patients in general practice on exercise has resulted in
gains in physical fitness and activity, but no health benefits have
been found
Counselling patients in general practice on exercise is effective in
increasing physical activity and improving quality of life over 12 months without evidence of adverse effects
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+