BMJ  2003;327:313 (9 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.313

Paper

Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, Box The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, ² Department of Public Health, Greater Glasgow NHS Board, Glasgow, ³ Information and Statistics Division, Common Services Agency, Edinburgh

Objective To determine whether a short interval between pregnancies is an independent risk factor for adverse obstetric outcome.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting Scotland.

Subjects 89 143 women having second births in 1992-8 who conceived within five years of their first birth.

Main outcome measures Intrauterine growth restriction (birth weight less than the 5th centile for gestational age), extremely preterm birth (24-32 weeks), moderately preterm birth (33-36 weeks), and perinatal death.

Results Women whose subsequent interpregnancy interval was less than six months were more likely than other women to have had a first birth complicated by intrauterine growth restriction (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.5), extremely preterm birth (4.1, 3.2 to 5.3), moderately preterm birth (1.5, 1.3 to 1.7), or perinatal death (24.4, 18.9 to 31.5). They were also shorter, less likely to be married, and more likely to be aged less than 20 years at the time of the second birth, to smoke, and to live in an area of high socioeconomic deprivation. When the outcome of the second birth was analysed in relation to the preceding interpregnancy interval and the analysis confined to women whose first birth was a term live birth (n = 69 055), no significant association occurred (adjusted for age, marital status, height, socioeconomic deprivation, smoking, previous birth weight vigesimal, and previous caesarean delivery) between interpregnancy interval and intrauterine growth restriction or stillbirth. However, a short interpregnancy interval (< 6 months) was an independent risk factor for extremely preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio 2.2, 1.3 to 3.6), moderately preterm birth (1.6, 1.3 to 2.0), and neonatal death unrelated to congenital abnormality (3.6, 1.2 to 10.7). The adjusted attributable fractions for these associations were 6.1%, 3.9%, and 13.8%. The associations were very similar when the analysis was confined to married non-smokers aged 25 and above.

Conclusions A short interpregnancy interval is an independent risk factor for preterm delivery and neonatal death in the second birth.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Short interpregnancy interval is associated with adverse outcome
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

parturition

william s. craig
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Poor maternal and perinatal outcome with short interpregnancy interval

Jai B Sharma, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Interpregnancy interval and breast feeding

angela m hamon
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Residual confounding and biased odds ratios

Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2003 [Full text]

too little DHEA

James M. Howard
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Re: too little DHEA FULL VERSION

James M. Howard
bmj.com, 24 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Re: Re: too little DHEA New Support: Magnesium: JAMA. 2003; 290: 2669-2676

James M. Howard
bmj.com, 27 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Re: Re: Re: too little DHEA New Support: Caesarean section: Lancet 2003; 362: 1779-84

James M. Howard
bmj.com, 30 Nov 2003 [Full text]