Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1192 (Published 20 November 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:1192
  1. Peter McCulloch, reader in surgery (petermcculloch{at}aol.com)1,
  2. Jeremy Ward, consultant surgeon2,
  3. Paris P Tekkis, research fellow for the ASCOT group of surgeons, on behalf of the British Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Group3
  1. 1Academic Unit of Surgery, University of Liverpool, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool L9 7AL,
  2. 2Chorley and South Ribble District General Hospital, Chorley, Lancashire PR7 1PP,
  3. 3Academic Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS
  1. Correspondence to: P McCulloch
  • Accepted 19 September 2003

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of comorbidity and other risk factors on postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing major oesophageal and gastric surgery.

Design Multicentre cohort study with data on postoperative mortality and morbidity in hospital.

Data source and methods The ASCOT prospective database, comprising 2087 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal and gastric cancer in 24 hospitals in England and Wales between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2002. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to model the risk of death and postoperative complications.

Results 955 patients underwent oesophagectomy or gastrectomy. Of these, 253 (27%) were graded ASA III or IV, and 187 (20%) had a high physiological POSSUM score (≥ 20). Operative mortality was 12% (111/955). Physiological POSSUM score, surgeon's assessment, type of operation, hospital case volume, and tumour stage independently predicted operative mortality. Medical complications were associated with higher physiological POSSUM scores and ASA grade, oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy, thoracotomy, and radical nodal dissection. Stage and additional organ resection predicted surgical (technical) complications.

Conclusions Many patients undergoing surgery for gastro-oesophageal cancer have major comorbid disease, which strongly influences their risk of postoperative death. Technical complications do not seem to be influenced by preoperative factors but reflect the extent of surgery and perhaps surgical judgment. Detailed prospective multicentre cooperative audit, with appropriate risk adjustment, is fundamental in the evaluation of cancer care and must be properly resourced.

Footnotes

  • Contributors PM set up the ASCOT study, contributed to the study design, data analysis, and interpretation, and is guarantor. He wrote the first draft of the paper and contributed to subsequent revisions. JW contributed to data extraction and analysis and the editing of the drafts of the paper. PPT designed the approach to the statistical analysis of the data and performed it. He was also involved in all stages of drafting and editing the manuscript.

  • Funding PPT was funded by the “Hue Falwasser” research fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. The University Hospital Aintree Trust provided an initial grant to the ASCOT project..

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval Not needed.

View Full Text