BMJ  2004;328:995 (24 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.38040.607141.EE (published 19 March 2004)

Primary care

Systematic review of efficacy of topical rubefacients containing salicylates for the treatment of acute and chronic pain

Lorna Mason, research associate1, R Andrew Moore, director of research1, Jayne E Edwards, senior researcher1, Henry J McQuay, professor of pain relief1, Sheena Derry, senior researcher1, Philip J Wiffen, coordinating editor, Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group1

1 Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ

Correspondence to: R A Moore andrew.moore{at}pru.ox.ac.uk

Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of topical rubefacients containing salicylates in acute and chronic pain.

Data sources Electronic databases and manufacturers of salicylates.

Study selection Randomised double blind trials comparing topical rubefacients with placebo or another active treatment, in adults with acute or chronic pain, and reporting dichotomous information, around a 50% reduction in pain, and analyses at one week for acute conditions and two weeks for chronic conditions.

Data extraction Relative benefit and number needed to treat, analysis of adverse events, and withdrawals.

Data synthesis Three double blind placebo controlled trials had information on 182 patients with acute conditions. Topical salicylate was significantly better than placebo (relative benefit 3.6, 95% confidence interval 2.4 to 5.6; number needed to treat 2.1, 1.7 to 2.8). Six double blind placebo controlled trials had information on 429 patients with chronic conditions. Topical salicylate was significantly better than placebo (relative benefit 1.5, 1.3 to 1.9; number needed to treat 5.3, 3.6 to 10.2), but larger, more valid studies were without significant effect. Local adverse events and withdrawals were generally rare in trials that reported them.

Conclusions Based on limited information, topically applied rubefacients containing salicylates may be efficacious in the treatment of acute pain. Trials of musculoskeletal and arthritic pain suggested moderate to poor efficacy. Adverse events were rare in studies of acute pain and poorly reported in those of chronic pain. Efficacy estimates for rubefacients are unreliable owing to a lack of good clinical trials.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

... and salicylate works better in acute pain
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

A commentary on commentaries
Richard Smith
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wassell, R. W., Adams, N., Kelly, P. J. (2006). The treatment of temporomandibular disorders with stabilizing splints in general dental practice: One-year follow-up.. Journal of the American Dental Association 137: 1089-1098 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2004). 23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004. Evid. Based Nurs. 7: e4-e4 [Full text]  
  • (2004). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 9: e5-e5 [Full text]  
  • Tramer, M. R (2004). It's not just about rubbing--topical capsaicin and topical salicylates may be useful as adjuvants to conventional pain treatment. BMJ 328: 998-998 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Efficacy of nicotinate esters
Hellmut Landmann
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview