BMJ  2005;330:1128 (14 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.38422.611736.E0 (published 12 April 2005)

Information in practice

Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet

¹ Advanced Center for Genome Technology, Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, 101 David L. Boren Blvd, Rm. 2025, Norman, OK 73019, USA

Objectives To determine how often reprints of scientific publications are shared online, whether journal readership level is a predictor, how the amount of file sharing changes with the age of the article, and to what degree open access publications are shared on non-journal websites.

Design The internet was searched using an application programming interface to Google, a popular and freely available search engine.

Main outcome measures The proportion of reprints of journal articles published between 1994 and 2004 from within 13 subscription based and four open access journals that could be located online at non-journal websites.

Results The probability that an article could be found online at a non-journal website correlated with the journal impact factor and the time since initial publication. Papers from higher impact journals and more recent articles were more likely to be located. On average, for the high impact journal articles published in 2003, over a third could be located at non-journal websites. Similar trends were observed for the delayed or full open access publications.

Conclusions Decentralised sharing of scientific reprints through the internet creates a degree of de facto open access that, though highly incomplete in its coverage, is none the less biased towards publications of higher popular demand.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Opening the lid on open access

Susan Mayor
BMJ 2008 336: 688-689. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Scientists bypass journal subscriptions
BMJ 2005 330: 0. [Full Text]

Open access, impact, and demand

Peter Suber
BMJ 2005 330: 1097-1098. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

NIH moves towards open access

Bob Roehr
BMJ 2004 329: 590. [Extract] [Full Text]

Relation between online "hit counts" and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ

Thomas V Perneger
BMJ 2004 329: 546-547. [Full Text] [PDF]

Open access could reduce cost of scientific publishing

Susan Mayor
BMJ 2004 328: 1094. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kazura, J. W. (2008). Challenges and Initiatives for the ASTMH's Journal: 2008 and Beyond. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 1-1 [Full text]  
• Ginsparg, P. (2006). As we may read.. J. Neurosci. 26: 9606-9608 [Full text]  
• Wren, J. D., Johnson, K. R., Crockett, D. M., Heilig, L. F., Schilling, L. M., Dellavalle, R. P. (2006). Uniform resource locator decay in dermatology journals: author attitudes and preservation practices.. Arch Dermatol 142: 1147-1152 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Steinbrook, R. (2006). Searching for the Right Search -- Reaching the Medical Literature. NEJM 354: 4-7 [Full text]  
• Suber, P. (2005). Open access, impact, and demand. BMJ 330: 1097-1098 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Open Access Misdefined: Open Access Findings Missed

Leslie A Carr, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Apr 2005 [Full text]

Technological problems in this study: PDF

Chung-hong Chan, et al.
bmj.com, 13 May 2005 [Full text]

Response to Carr and Chan

Jonathan D. Wren
bmj.com, 21 May 2005 [Full text]