BMJ  2006;333:279 (5 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.38891.681215.AE (published 21 July 2006)

Research

Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis? Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo controlled randomised trials

¹ Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotics in acute purulent rhinitis (many guidelines advise against their use on the basis of one study that showed no effect).

Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

Review methods Meta-analysis of data from double blind randomised placebo controlled trials comparing antibiotics with placebo for acute purulent rhinitis (duration less than 10 days).

Results Seven studies were retrieved; four contributed data on benefits of antibiotics, and four contributed data on harms of antibiotics. The pooled relative risk of benefit for persistent purulent rhinitis at five to eight days with antibiotics was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.33). The numbers needed to treat ranged from 7 to 15 when the pooled relative risk was applied to the range of control event rates. The relative risk for adverse effects with antibiotics was 1.46 (1.10 to 1.94). The numbers needed to harm for adverse effects ranged from 12 to 78. No serious harms were reported in the placebo arms.

Conclusions Antibiotics are probably effective for acute purulent rhinitis. They can cause harm, usually in the form of gastrointestinal effects. Most patients will get better without antibiotics, supporting the current "no antibiotic as first line" advice.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: There is no significant difference between antibiotics

Christopher J Cates
BMJ 2006 333: 395. [Extract] [Full Text]

Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis?

Joanne Rimmer and John Almeyda
BMJ 2006 333: 395-396. [Extract] [Full Text]

Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: Review is symptomatic of medicine today

Raymond Friedman
BMJ 2006 333: 396. [Extract] [Full Text]

Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections and conjunctivitis in primary care

Remco P Rietveld, Patrick J E Bindels, and Gerben ter Riet
BMJ 2006 333: 311-312. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Antibiotics for acute purulent rhinitis-wait and watch
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Dorsen, C. (2007). Review: antibiotics are effective for acute purulent rhinitis but are associated with increased gastrointestinal side effects. Evid. Based Nurs. 10: 9-9 [Full text]  
• (2006). Are Antibiotics Effective in Acute Purulent Rhinitis?. JWatch General 2006: 5-5 [Full text]  
• (2006). Antibiotics for Purulent Rhinitis. JWatch Emergency Med. 2006: 3-3 [Full text]  
• Friedman, R. (2006). Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: Review is symptomatic of medicine today. BMJ 333: 396-396 [Full text]  
• Cates, C. J (2006). Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: There is no significant difference between antibiotics. BMJ 333: 395-395 [Full text]  
• Rimmer, J., Almeyda, J. (2006). Antibiotics and acute purulent rhinitis: Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis?. BMJ 333: 395-396 [Full text]  
• Rietveld, R. P, Bindels, P. J E, ter Riet, G. (2006). Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections and conjunctivitis in primary care. BMJ 333: 311-312 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

There is no significant difference between antibiotics

Christopher J Cates
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2006 [Full text]

We agree with Chris Cates but add a practical perspective

Bruce Arroll, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis?

Joanne Rimmer, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2006 [Full text]

'Snot Always Easy to Decide

Mark W. Heffington
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2006 [Full text]