BMJ 2001;322:664-667 ( 17 March )

Education and debate

Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal

Margaret Holmes-Rovner, professor aHilary Llewellyn-Thomas, professor bVikki Entwistle, senior research fellow cAngela Coulter, chief executive dAnnette O'Connor, senior scientist eDavid R Rovner, professor emeritus a

a College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48823, USA, b Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA, c Health Services Research Unit, University of Abderdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, d Picker Institute Europe, King's Mead House, Oxpens Road, Oxford OX1 1RX, e Loeb Research Institute and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada

Correspondence to: M Holmes-Rovner, B213 Clinical Center, Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA mholmes@msu.edu

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Evidence based health care has become the accepted basis of good clinical practice, and many efforts are being made to implement it. Evidence based patient choice, defined as offering patients research based information and the opportunity to influence decisions about their treatment and care, has yet to achieve the same status. We believe, however, that it is fundamental to high quality patient care.

In our ideal world difficult or controversial healthcare decisions would routinely involve health professionals deliberating with patients about the harms and benefits of all available options, as well as patients' treatment goals and risk tolerance. For key medical decisions, patients and doctors would expect to work through the evidence and decide on a course of action together. Patients who wished to delegate decision making to a doctor or surrogate decision maker would still be given the information that they wanted.

Various strategies may be needed to achieve . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gambrill, E. (2007). Transparency as the Route to Evidence-Informed Professional Education. Research on Social Work Practice 17: 553-560 [Abstract]  
  • Harris, M, Smith, B J, Veale, A, Esterman, A, Frith, P A, Selim, P (2006). Providing patients with reviews of evidence about COPD treatments: a controlled trial of outcomes. Chronic Respiratory Disease 3: 133-140 [Abstract]  
  • Harris, M., Smith, B., Veale, A. (2005). Engaging patients in evidence-based medicine: development of a resource for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Illness 1: 330-336  
  • Rovner, D. R., Wills, C. E., Bonham, V., Williams, G., Lillie, J., Kelly-Blake, K., Williams, M. V., Holmes-Rovner, M. (2004). Decision Aids for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Applicability across Race and Education. Med Decis Making 24: 359-366 [Abstract]  
  • Chamot, E., Charvet, A., Perneger, T. V. (2004). Women's Preferences for Doctor's Involvement in Decisions about Mammography Screening. Med Decis Making 24: 379-385 [Abstract]  
  • Fagerlin, A., Rovner, D., Stableford, S., Jentoft, C., Wei, J. T., Holmes-Rovner, M. (2004). Patient Education Materials about the Treatment of Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. ANN INTERN MED 140: 721-728 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coulter, A. (2002). After Bristol: putting patients at the centre. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 186-188 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wong, C.-K., White, H.D. (2002). Has the mortality rate from acute myocardial infarction fallen substantially in recent years?. Eur Heart J 23: 689-692 [Full text]  
  • Coulter, A., Dunn, N. (2002). After Bristol: putting patients at the centre * Commentary: Patient centred care: timely, but is it practical?. BMJ 324: 648-651 [Full text]  
  • Vincent, C A, Coulter, A (2002). Patient safety: what about the patient?. Qual Saf Health Care 11: 76-80 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Greenhalgh, T., Wright, P., Murray, E., Haines, A., Tai, S. S., Davis, H., Gray, A., Coulter, A. (2002). Use of interactive multimedia decision aids. BMJ 324: 296-296 [Full text]  
  • Devereaux, P J, Anderson, D. R, Gardner, M. J, Putnam, W., Flowerdew, G. J, Brownell, B. F, Nagpal, S., Cox, J. L, Fahey, T. (2001). Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study Commentary: Varied preferences reflect the reality of clinical practice. BMJ 323: 1218-1218 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The best ideas are the old ones
Roger M Goss
bmj.com, 24 Mar 2001 [Full text]



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview