Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Long term social and psychological effects may be worse than acute ones
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The ostensible purpose of chemical and
biological weapons is to endanger lives. Biological agents, however,
are particularly ineffective as military weapons, while chemical
weapons have only limited uses. This may be why armies have generally
acquiesced in international treaties to contain these unpredictable
weapons and feel capable of waging war without them. Instead, chemical and biological weapons are quintessentially weapons of terror. The now
routine journalistic association between chemical and biological
weapons and the word terror confirms that the purpose of these weapons
is to wreak destruction via psychological means
by inducing fear,
confusion, and uncertainty in everyday life.
1 2
These
effects will take two forms, acute and long term. It is customary to
expect largescale panic if such weapons are ever effectively deployed
or thought to be deployed.
We do not, however, know whether such panic would materialise.
Media stories emerging from the United States in the past few days
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+