BMJ 2001;323:878-879 ( 20 October )

Editorials

Psychological implications of chemical and biological weapons

Long term social and psychological effects may be worse than acute ones

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The ostensible purpose of chemical and biological weapons is to endanger lives. Biological agents, however, are particularly ineffective as military weapons, while chemical weapons have only limited uses. This may be why armies have generally acquiesced in international treaties to contain these unpredictable weapons and feel capable of waging war without them. Instead, chemical and biological weapons are quintessentially weapons of terror. The now routine journalistic association between chemical and biological weapons and the word terror confirms that the purpose of these weapons is to wreak destruction via psychological means---by inducing fear, confusion, and uncertainty in everyday life. 1 2 These effects will take two forms, acute and long term. It is customary to expect largescale panic if such weapons are ever effectively deployed or thought to be deployed.

We do not, however, know whether such panic would materialise. Media stories emerging from the United States in the past few days . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Response to bioterrorism
Meng-Kin Lim, Margaret Bree, Janet Stevenson, Jonathan L Temte, Paul Barach, and Stephen T Green
BMJ 2002 324: 362. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Zheng, G., Jimba, M., Wakai, S. (2005). Exploratory Study on Psychosocial Impact of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Outbreak on Chinese Students Living in Japan. Asia Pac J Public Health 17: 124-129 [Abstract]  
  • Alexander, D. A., Klein, S. (2003). Biochemical terrorism: too awful to contemplate, too serious to ignore: Subjective literature review. Br. J. Psychiatry 183: 491-497 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mason, B W, Lyons, R A (2003). Acute psychological effects of suspected bioterrorism. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 353-354 [Full text]  
  • Winters, W., Devriese, S., Van Diest, I., Nemery, B., Veulemans, H., Eelen, P., Van de Woestijne, K., Van den Bergh, O. (2003). Media Warnings About Environmental Pollution Facilitate the Acquisition of Symptoms in Response to Chemical Substances. Psychosom. Med. 65: 332-338 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Salerno, J. A., Nagy, C. (2002). Guest Editorial: Terrorism and Aging. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 57: M552-554 [Full text]  
  • Hyams, K. C., Murphy, F. M., Wessely, S. (2002). Responding to Chemical, Biological, or Nuclear Terrorism: The Indirect and Long-Term Health Effects May Present the Greatest Challenge. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 27: 273-292 [Abstract]  
  • BARTHOLOMEW, R. E., WESSELY, S. (2002). Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness: From possessed nuns to chemical and biological terrorism fears. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 300-306 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Evison, D., Hinsley, D., Rice, P. (2002). Regular review: Chemical weapons. BMJ 324: 332-335 [Full text]  
  • Beeching, N. J, Dance, D. A B, Miller, A. R O, Spencer, R. C (2002). Biological warfare and bioterrorism. BMJ 324: 336-339 [Full text]  
  • Helfand, I., Forrow, L., Tiwari, J., Bhutta, Z. A, Nundy, S., Colvard, K. (2002). Nuclear terrorism Commentary: The myth of nuclear deterrence in south Asia Commentary: The psychology of terrorists. BMJ 324: 356-359 [Full text]  
  • Lim, M.-K., Bree, M., Stevenson, J., Temte, J. L, Barach, P., Green, S. T (2002). Response to bioterrorism. BMJ 324: 362-362 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

"Mass Sociogenic" Infection Explains MSbP
Barbara Bryan
bmj.com, 23 Oct 2001 [Full text]
"All the world is queer...."
Gurli Bagnall
bmj.com, 24 Oct 2001 [Full text]
The reality of chemical and biological warfare.
Tom McGlynn
bmj.com, 19 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Unspeakable Weapons
Meng-Kin Lim
bmj.com, 29 Nov 2001 [Full text]
Bioterrorism, the BMJ and the Nature Medicine
Abhijit Chaudhuri
bmj.com, 1 Dec 2001 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview