Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Patients are sometimes referred to as "bad
historians." But who is the historian? "Historian" refers to the
one taking and interpreting history, not the subject (whether a person
or a topic). If a history is contradictory, lacking evidence, or
irrelevant this could well represent part of the intrinsic problem
rather than be a deliberate attempt to mislead. If you attribute blame to the historian you rightly (albeit inadvertently) blame yourself.
Lavender Hill Group Practice, London
We welcome articles up to 600 words on topics such as A memorable patient, A paper that changed my practice, My most unfortunate mistake, or any other piece conveying instruction, pathos, or humour. If possible the article should be supplied on a disk. Permission is needed from the patient or a relative if an identifiable patient is referred to. We also welcome contributions for "Endpieces," consisting of quotations of up to 80 words (but most are considerably shorter) from any source, ancient or modern, which have appealed to the reader.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+