BMJ 2001;323:1243 ( 24 November )

Filler

When I use a word

Historian

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

Patients are sometimes referred to as "bad historians." But who is the historian? "Historian" refers to the one taking and interpreting history, not the subject (whether a person or a topic). If a history is contradictory, lacking evidence, or irrelevant this could well represent part of the intrinsic problem rather than be a deliberate attempt to mislead. If you attribute blame to the historian you rightly (albeit inadvertently) blame yourself.

Helen Lucas, general practitioner

Lavender Hill Group Practice, London


We welcome articles up to 600 words on topics such as A memorable patient, A paper that changed my practice, My most unfortunate mistake, or any other piece conveying instruction, pathos, or humour. If possible the article should be supplied on a disk. Permission is needed from the patient or a relative if an identifiable patient is referred to. We also welcome contributions for "Endpieces," consisting of quotations of up to 80 words (but most are considerably shorter) from any source, ancient or modern, which have appealed to the reader.


© BMJ 2001

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview