BMJ  2003;326:1083-1084 (17 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1083

Education and debate

Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care

Veronica Morton, research fellow1, David J Torgerson, director1

1 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD

Correspondence to: Dr Torgerson djt6@york.ac.uk

Knowledge of regression to the mean can help with everything from interpreting test results to improving your career prospects. All healthcare professionals should be aware of its implications

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Regression to the mean is a widespread statistical phenomenon with potentially serious implications for health care. It can result in wrongly concluding that an effect is due to treatment when it is due to chance. Ignorance of the problem will lead to errors in decision making. We discuss the importance of the issue and its effects on many common clinical, public health, and managerial decisions.

What is regression to the mean?

Regression to the mean occurs whenever a nonrandom sample is selected from a population and two imperfectly correlated variables are measured, such as two consecutive blood pressure measurements. The less correlated the two variables, the larger the effect of regression to the mean. Also, the more extreme the value from the population mean, the more room there is to regress to the mean. It occurs whenever a group is selected with extreme values for one variable and another variable is then measured.1 2

Francis Galton documented . . . [Full text of this article]

Diagnostic tests


New treatments


Placebo effect


Public health


Healthcare management


Clinical audit


What are the solutions?



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Need good results? Fiddle them
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stone, S. P., Cooper, B. S., Kibbler, C. C., Cookson, B. D., Roberts, J. A., Medley, G. F., Duckworth, G., Lai, R., Ebrahim, S., Brown, E. M., Wiffen, P. J., Davey, P. G. (2007). The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of Outbreak Reports and Intervention studies Of Nosocomial infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 833-840 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • De Simone, G. G, Eisenchlas, J. H, Junin, M., Pereyra, F., Brizuela, R. (2006). Atropine drops for drooling: a randomized controlled trial.. Palliat Med 20: 665-671 [Abstract]  
  • CUNNINGHAM, J. A. (2006). REGRESSION TO THE MEAN: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?. Alcohol Alcohol 41: 580-580 [Full text]  
  • Hendershot, E., Pappo, A., Malkin, D., Sung, L. (2006). Tumor Necrosis in Pediatric Osteosarcoma: Impact of Modern Therapies. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 23: 176-181 [Abstract]  
  • Cvetkovski, R. S., Zachariae, R., Jensen, H., Olsen, J., Johansen, J. D., Agner, T. (2006). Prognosis of Occupational Hand Eczema: A Follow-up Study.. Arch Dermatol 142: 305-311 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • JOHNSSON, K. O., BERGLUND, M. (2006). COMPARISON BETWEEN A COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL ALCOHOL PROGRAMME AND POST-MAILED MINIMAL INTERVENTION IN HIGH-RISK DRINKING UNIVERSITY FRESHMEN: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Alcohol Alcohol 41: 174-180 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Harris, A. D., McGregor, J. C., Perencevich, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., Finkelstein, J. (2006). The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13: 16-23 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kinra, S, Baumer, J H, Davey Smith, G (2005). Early growth and childhood obesity: a historical cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 1122-1127 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Garland, A. (2005). Improving the ICU: Part 1. Chest 127: 2151-2164 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Pilkington, P., Kinra, S. (2005). Effectiveness of speed cameras in preventing road traffic collisions and related casualties: systematic review. BMJ 330: 331-334 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cooper, B S, Stone, S P, Kibbler, C C, Cookson, B D, Roberts, J A, Medley, G F, Duckworth, G, Lai, R, Ebrahim, S (2004). Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): systematic review of the literature. BMJ 329: 533- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fetterolf, D., West, R. (2004). The Business Case for Quality: Combining Medical Literature Research with Health Plan Data to Establish Value for Nonclinical Managers. American Journal of Medical Quality 19: 48-55 [Abstract]  
  • Walker, J., Sofaer, B. (2003). Randomised controlled trials in the evaluation of non-biomedical therapeutic interventions for pain: The gold standard?. Journal of Research in Nursing 8: 317-329 [Abstract]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Understanding variation
Tom P Marshall, et al.
bmj.com, 16 May 2003 [Full text]
Regression to the mean and publication bias
Javier Llorca, et al.
bmj.com, 20 May 2003 [Full text]
Concerning regression to the mean
David P Mitchell
bmj.com, 27 May 2003 [Full text]
On "regression to the mean"
Nelson B. Watts
bmj.com, 29 May 2003 [Full text]
Regression to the mean does not explain public health effects
Nick J Andrews, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Jun 2003 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview