Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1341-1342 (21 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1341
Updated guidelines offer practical and safe clinical advice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Pulmonary embolism is a great masquerader. It presents with numerous non-specific signs and symptoms that may mimic a variety of other clinical conditions. Once pulmonary embolism is suspected diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are highly dependent on the clinical presentation of the patient, the local resources, and the expertise of the doctor treating the patient. Many algorithms have been established to prevent underdiagnosing and over-diagnosing the disease as both carry a substantial risk of fatality. Unfortunately a universally accepted approach to the management of pulmonary embolism is still missing.
In 1997 the British Thoracic Society
(www.britthoracic.org.uk)
published a practical strategy for managing suspected pulmonary embolism, to
bridge the gap between clinical research and routine
management.1 Over
the past six years more evidence has been generated, and a major update now
means that these recommendations can be converted into practical guidelines
for daily use.2 Four
major issues in pulmonary embolism
Karin Janata, consultant
University of Vienna, Währingergürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (karin.janata@akh-wien.ac.at)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+