Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:1050 (1 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1050
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In 1955 I was a registrar in a large mental hospital in the north of England. Most of the beds were in the old buildings, which had remained largely unchanged for nearly 100 years. There was also a modern building in the grounds, to which new patients were admitted. If these patients needed electroconvulsive therapy, they were anaesthetised and given a muscle relaxant. Electroconvulsive therapy was also widely used in the chronic wards, where it was the consequence of disturbed behaviour. There, it was given "straight"that is, without anaesthetic or relaxant. This policy was defended by the view that the patients had never known anything different. However, one day, the medical superintendent came across an article which showed that a third of patients receiving straight electroconvulsive therapy had radiological evidence of vertebral compression fractures. He was appalled and immediately decreed that all patients receiving such therapy should have proper anaesthetic
Alan Gibson, retired consultant psychiatrist
Woking
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+