Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328 (29 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.0-f
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Question Does use of the test for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the diagnosis of acute dyspnoea improve patients' outcomes?
Synopsis Too often, new tests are introduced without a careful examination of their effect on patient oriented outcomes. Accuracy alone is not reason enough to adopt a test; a more important reason is that its use helps patients live better or longer lives. We should also know whether is adds or reduces cost. There is previous convincing evidence that B-type natriuretic peptide is accurate in diagnosing heart failure in patients presenting with acute dyspnoea (
N Engl J Med 2002;106: 416-22). This latest randomised controlled trial (single blinded) study is the first to look at the larger impact of this test's use in clinical practice. Of 665 consecutive adults presenting to a Swiss emergency department with acute dyspnoea, 452 met the inclusion criteria. Patients with an obvious traumatic cause,
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+