Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2005;331:1190-1192 (19 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1190
Frank Sullivan, NHS Tayside professor of research and development in general practice and primary care, Jeremy C Wyatt, professor of health informatics
University of Dundee.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A huge volume of data flows across the desk of a director of public health (see box opposite). One of the director's problems is to know which signals to act upon and what "noise" to ignore. If the numbers being considered are small, as they probably will be in the case described here, a critical incident analysis may be all that is needed. An individual prescriber, or group, may have an erroneous belief or inadequate training. Critical incidents or other signals often indicate that more data (such as data on prescribing steroids for paediatric asthma in primary care and outpatients) are needed.
|
Health services are awash with data. Earlier articles in the
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+