Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2006;333:96 (8 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7558.96
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe letter by Esprit et al reporting a case of injury from lightning strike while using a mobile phone required some better research into the physics of lightning, conductors, and statistics.1
Firstly, the statistics are few. Three mentions of people using a mobile phone while being hit by a lightning strike is by no means compelling evidence for a correlation for either the strike or unusually serious injury. Indeed, one of the pieces of evidence does not support the theory of a mobile phone causing serious injury: "Last year, 10 tourists seeking shelter [were] struck by lightning when one of them was using a mobile phone. Fortunately, no one was seriously injured."2 Not enough evidence is presented to argue that use of a mobile phone either attracted the strike or caused serious injury.
Secondly, the suggestion that the metal in a mobile phone is channelling the path of
Ramsey M Faragher, PhD student
Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE rmf25@cam.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+