Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:588-589 (22 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39315.453056.AD
Geoff Watts, freelance journalist
London
geoff@scileg.freeserve.co.uk
Smells form some of our most memorable experiences, but people who cannot detect them are largely forgotten. Geoff Watts sniffs out the researchers
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Tell the world that you are blind or deaf or have no sense of touch and you can count on a measure of sympathy. But say that you have lost your sense of smell and the response will be, likely as not, indifference. We humans are not animals, are we? Of all our senses, smell is the least important.
Maybe so—but that is small consolation to people with the problem. Still more dispiriting for them is the lack of medical interest in disorders of smell, whether in treatment or research. Of the handful of UK clinicians with a special interest in the topic, two of the most active took it up more or less by chance and have to combine it with other work.
Evidence on the prevalence of olfactory disorders is patchy and conflicting. Tim Jacob, a physiologist who teaches a course on the senses at Cardiff University and
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+