BMJ  2007;335 (13 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39363.612095.47

Editor's Choice

The way of the world

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This week I clicked the Send button without realising that my email was being shared with the person I was writing about. I was warning colleagues that I'd banned a persistent respondent "from raving on about" his pet theory using rapid responses and didn't want him opening up another front using feedback to Richard Lehman's blog.

While the respondent ponders whether my "less than polite" response deserves wider exposure, I'm pondering whether I should have "sender's remorse" for describing his behaviour in the terms I did. After all, this followed 17 rapid responses (his count) on the same topic from him and three emails from me, asking him to stop.

Thoughts about appropriate tone were running through my head when I read David Colquhoun's criticisms of our associate editor (and former US editor), Doug Kamerow, for being "excessively tolerant" of the advance of complementary and alternative medicine (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39360.446528.BE). . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

What to do about CAM?

David Colquhoun
BMJ 2007 335: 736. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Review shows no evidence that individualised herbal treatments are effective

Susan Mayor
BMJ 2007 335: 743. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A foolish, fond old man

Theodore Dalrymple
BMJ 2007 335: 777. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

What doctors should tell their patients about CAM

Roger A Fisken
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2007 [Full text]

Good Manners

Alexandra C Moore
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2007 [Full text]