Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335 (8 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39420.416100.59
Trevor Jackson, magazine editor, BMJ
tjackson@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The front cover of this weeks BMJ is the first to rely solely on words since we redesigned the journal at the beginning of this year, and even since we introduced regular cover pictures in 2002. The dangers of trying to find one clear, recognisable image for a topic like circumcision—which receives two quite different treatments this week, as the subject of our Head to Head debate (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39406.520498.AD and 10.1136/bmj.39406.523762.AD) and our Clinical review (doi: 10.1136/bmj.39385.382708.AD)—might seem obvious. Fortunately, the typographic possibilities inherent in the word itself are visual enough.
Some readers might ask why the BMJ has to be visual at all, especially those who still lament the passing of the blue covers that, until five years ago, displayed each weeks full list of contents. One obvious answer is that medical journals have to compete in an increasingly crowded and visual marketplace, vying for attention not
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+