BMJ  2008;336:781-782 (12 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39511.514051.80 (published 14 March 2008)

Editorials

Continuous deep sedation in patients nearing death

Imprecise taxonomy makes interpreting trends difficult

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Deep sedation is occasionally the only effective treatment for refractory symptoms and suffering in terminally ill patients. In their accompanying study, Rietjens and colleagues report a significant rise in continuous deep sedation in the Netherlands from 5.6% in 2001 to 7.1% in 2005, while cases of euthanasia declined over the same period.1

Continuous deep sedation is an accepted treatment in the Netherlands for patients whose life expectancy is two weeks or less. The Dutch study reports that 1200 fewer people died as a result of euthanasia but 1800 more died as a result of terminal sedation in 2005 than in 2001. Although the increase follows the publication in 2002 of guidelines for general practitioners on the use of continuous deep sedation, and attention in the Dutch media, the cause of this trend is unclear. There is concern that continuous deep sedation may enable doctors to evade the procedural requirements for . . . [Full text of this article]

Scott A Murray, St Columba’s professor of primary palliative care1, Kirsty Boyd, consultant in palliative medicine2, Ira Byock, director of palliative medicine and professor of anesthesiology and community and family medicine3

1 Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Division of Community Health Sciences: General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, 2 Palliative Care Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, 3 Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756-0001, USA

Scott.Murray@ed.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Please, don’t forget ethical responsibilities
Philip J Harrison
BMJ 2008 336: 1085. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
Judith Rietjens, Johannes van Delden, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Hilde Buiting, Paul van der Maas, and Agnes van der Heide
BMJ 2008 336: 810-813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Harrison, P. J (2008). Please, don't forget ethical responsibilities. BMJ 336: 1085-1085 [Full text]  
  • Treloar, A. J (2008). Dutch research reflects problems with the Liverpool care pathway. BMJ 336: 905-905 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

A term impossible to define?
Don C Aston
bmj.com, 11 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Please, dont forget ethical responsibities
Philip J. Harrison
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Continuous Deep Sedation in the UK- Dutch research reflects problems with the Liverpool Care Pathway
Adrian J Treloar
bmj.com, 14 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Helpful Article
Graeme M Mackenzie
bmj.com, 14 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Continuous Deep Sedation and LCP concerns
Fiona M Downs, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Re: Continuous Deep Sedation and LCP concerns
Mary Knowles
bmj.com, 17 Apr 2008 [Full text]
Re: Continuous Deep Sedation in the UK- Dutch research reflects problems with the Liverpool Care Pathway
John E Ellershaw
bmj.com, 4 May 2008 [Full text]
LCP concerns;- clarifications and an apology
Adrian Treloar
bmj.com, 6 May 2008 [Full text]
Palliative care and sedation: the Liverpool Care Pathway
Gillian M Craig
bmj.com, 19 May 2008 [Full text]
LCP - amend , don't abandon
Ian N Back
bmj.com, 21 May 2008 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview