BMJ 1995;311:589-593 (2 September)

Papers

Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland

Juha Pekkanen, head of department,a Jaakko Tuomilehto, professor,b Antti Uutela, head of laboratory,b Erkki Vartiainen, head of laboratory,b Aulikki Nissinen, professor c

a Department of Environmental Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute, PO Box 95, FIN-70701 Kuopio, Finland, b Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300 Helsinki, Finland, c Department of Community Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio, PL 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland

Correspondence to: Dr Pekkanen.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the associations between social class as defined by occupation, health behaviour, and mortality from all causes and coronary heart disease among middle aged men and women in eastern Finland.
Design: Prospective observational study of two independent, random population samples examined in 1972 and 1977.
Setting: North Karelia and Kuopio, Finland.
Subjects: 8967 men and 9694 women aged 30-64 years at the beginning of the follow up study. The subjects were followed up for mortality up till 1987 by using the National Death Registry.
Measurements and main results: Altogether 1429 men and 620 women died during the follow up, 603 men and 164 women of coronary heart disease. Among both sexes, compared with white collar workers unskilled blue collar workers had more adverse risk factors and also higher mortality due to coronary heart disease, other cardiovascular diseases, cancer, violent causes, and all other causes. Among men the age adjusted relative risk for all cause mortality in unskilled blue collar workers v white collar workers was reduced from 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.55 to 2.22) to 1.47 (1.23 to 1.77) when adjusted for smoking, serum cholesterol concentration, hypertension, body mass index, and physical activity in leisure time. Among women the corresponding reduction in hazard ratio was from 1.49 (1.15 to 1.92) to 1.39 (1.07 to 1.81). The respective hazard ratios for coronary heart disease were 1.54 (1.16 to 2.02) and 1.22 (0.92 to 1.61) among men and 1.74 (1.05 to 2.90) and 1.66 (0.99 to 2.79) among women.
Conclusions: Unfavourable cardiovascular risk factors and high mortality are concentrated among lower social classes in Finland. Among men about half of the excess coronary and all cause mortality among unskilled blue collar workers was associated with their unfavourable risk factor profile. The association was smaller in women.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • No previous study has assessed what proportion of the excess coronary mortality among women in lower social classes is associated with risk factors

  • In this Finnish study about half of the excess mortality among men in lower social classes but a clearly smaller proportion among women was associated with their more adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile

  • It may be possible to narrow differences in health between social classes through improvements in health behaviour, especially among men

  • This by itself will not be sufficient, but the increasing health inequalities need to be dealt with at multiple levels, from general social policy to everyday practice

Introduction

Differences in mortality between the social classes are clearly larger in Finland than in other Nordic countries and also possibly somewhat larger than in Great Britain.1 2 During the 1980s the relative differences in mortality between the social classes have increased in Finland.3 4 Social class measured in middle age and mortality from future coronary heart disease are interwoven in a complex network of influences, and more adverse cardiovascular risk factors among the lower social classes explain only part of their higher mortality.5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Other factors include current material conditions, social mobility, psychosocial factors, and environmental influences as well as health during pregnancy and childhood.15 According to most previous analyses7 8 9 10 11 12 14 about one quarter to one half of the excess coronary risk among men in lower social classes is associated with well known, preventable cardiovascular risk factors. None of these previous analyses has, however, studied women. In the present article we examine the associations between social class, as defined by occupation, cardiovascular risk factors, and mortality among 18661 middle aged men and women in eastern Finland.

Study population and methods

In connection with the North Karelia Project independent 6.6% random samples of men and women born in 1913-47 and living in the counties of North Karelia and Kuopio were invited for examination in 1972 (men and women aged 25-59) and in 1977 (men and women aged 30-64).16 The only larger urban area in North Karelia is Joensuu, a town of 50000 inhabitants. An additional 6.6% random sample of those living in Joensuu was also examined and added to the present analyses to increase sample size among non-farmers. Participation rates were 92.4% in 1972 and 89.6% in 1977.17 Smoking, physical activity in leisure time, and use of antihypertensive drugs were determined from a self administered questionnaire. Blood pressure was measured once with subjects seated, and serum cholesterol concentration was analysed with the Liebermann-Burchard method.

Occupational status was obtained through record linkage with the 1970 population census for those examined in 1972 and with the 1975 population census for those examined in 1977. Subjects were divided into four social classes on the basis of the 21 grade socioeconomic variable in the population census database by following the classification used by Valkonen et al.3 The four social classes used were (a) white collar workers--for example, those with university degrees, technicians, nurses, book keepers, cashiers, bank clerks, sales staff, telephone operators, noncommissioned officers; (b) skilled blue collar workers--for example, postal workers, janitors, railway staff, workers in mining and manufacturing work (except assistant workers), fire fighters, cooks, waiters, hairdressers; (c) unskilled blue collar workers--for example, forestry workers, assistant workers, kitchen hands, cleaners, nursery nurses, messengers, lift attendants; and (d) farmers--own account workers at farms and agricultural employers.

Pensioners were classified according to their past occupation. Employers and own account workers in occupations other than agriculture, students, pensioners with missing past occupation, and others with missing data on socioeconomic status were excluded from the analyses (n=1355). Housewives and others without present or past occupation were classified according to the head of the household. The final analysis included 8967 men and 9694 women aged 30 to 64 years. None of the subjects had missing data on smoking.

Follow up of mortality in the study population was achieved through record linkage with the National Death Registry. By the end of 1987 there had been 2049 deaths, 767 due to coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases (eighth revision) codes 410-414).

Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure >159 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >94 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive drugs during the past week. Smokers who had quit smoking during the past six months were classified as current smokers. Obesity was defined as body mass index exceeding 27 kg/m2. Physical activity in leisure time was determined by using a four level question describing the usual intensity of physical activity in leisure time. Those subjects who mostly read, watched television, or did other non-strenuous activities were classified as having little physical activity in leisure time. Those reporting as having been unemployed most of the year were classified as unemployed.

Means were age standardised by analysis of covariance and proportions and mortality rates by the direct method by using study population as the standard. Differences in risk factors attributable to social class were tested by using logistic regression models for categorical variables and analysis of covariance for continuous variables. Mortality was analysed with Cox's proportional hazards model.18 Statistical tests for differences in social class were global tests for heterogeneity with 3 df, except in tables IV and V, in which tests for trend are also presented. Farmers were excluded from these tests for trend.

As the associations for social class with mortality among both sexes were similar in the two cohorts and in the two areas, only pooled estimates are presented. Area and cohort were adjusted for by stratification in the Cox's models. Inspection of the residuals of the final Cox's models revealed no outliers and no departures from the proportionality assumption for social class.

In the mortality analysis serum cholesterol concentration, body mass index, and square of body mass index were used as continuous variables; smoking was divided into three categories (as in table VI), and other variables were dichotomised.

Results

The largest social class among men was skilled blue collar workers, but among women it was white collar workers (table I). Differences in education were large between the social classes. Among men, unskilled blue collar workers were more often unmarried and unemployed than men in other classes. There were also large differences in car ownership. Among women these differences were smaller.


TABLE I--Age adjusted distributions (percentages) of selected socioeconomic factors among eastern Finnish
men and women aged 30-64 in 1972-7 by social class
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Mean (SD)                      With 8 years
Social class                        No         age (years)        Married     of education         Owned cars  Unemployed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 White collar workers              2138        42.7 (9.2)          92              64                 83             1
 Skilled blue collar workers       3057        43.1 (8.9)          85              18                 64             2
 Unskilled blue collar workers     1358        45.4 (9.0)          60               6                 34             5
 Farmers                           2414        47.6 (9.0)          78              11                 55             1

 P value*                                        <0.001          <0.001          <0.001             <0.001         <0.001
Women:
 White collar workers              3318        42.4 (8.9)          75              59                 67             1
 Skilled blue collar workers       1947        45.1 (9.5)          81              18                 51             2
 Unskilled blue collar workers     1529        46.9 (9.0)          76              14                 42             2
 Farmers                           2900        48.6 (8.9)          82              17                 49             1

 P value*                                        <0.001          <0.001          <0.001             <0.001         <0.001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Significance of global test for heterogeneity of differences between four social classes after adjustment for age, living
area, and year of examination.

Levels of all risk factors, except obesity among men and smoking among women, changed to a less favourable direction from white collar workers to unskilled blue collar workers (table II). Among men, farmers in general occupied an intermediate position but had the most unfavourable mean concentrations of serum cholesterol and physical activity in leisure time. Among women, farmers had the lowest prevalence of smoking but had unfavourable levels of other risk factors.


TABLE II--Age adjusted cardiovascular risk factors among eastern Finnish men and women aged 30-64 in 1972-7 by social class
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 %               %               %         % Who undertook             Mean (SD)               Mean (SD)
                                                Who             With            With     little physical activity   serum cholesterol           height
Social class                         No        smoked      hypertension*       obesity        in leisure time           (mmol/l)                 (cm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 White collar workers               2138         42             36               37                  18                6.63 (1.20)            173.3 (6.3)
 Skilled blue collar workers        3057         53             39               36                  25                6.76 (1.28)            171.2 (6.2)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      1358         63             44               29                  36                6.90 (1.26)            169.8 (6.6)
 Farmers                            2414         44             39               34                  47                6.96 (1.32)            170.9 (6.5)

 P value+                                      <0.001          <0.01            <0.001             <0.001                <0.001                 <0.001
Women:
 White collar workers               3318         15             31               30                  32                6.57 (1.30)            159.8 (5.7)
 Skilled blue collar workers        1947         16             36               40                  45                6.72 (1.38)            158.1 (5.6)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      1529         14             36               42                  47                6.81 (1.35)            157.3 (6.1)
 Farmers                            2900          4             43               45                  65                6.86 (1.38)            157.9 (5.8)

 P value+                                      <0.001          <0.001           <0.001             <0.001                <0.001                 <0.001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Systolic blood pressure >159 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >94 mm Hg or taking drugs for blood pressure.
+Significance of global test for heterogeneity of differences between four social classes after adjustment for age, living area, and year of examination.

All cause mortality was highest among unskilled blue collar workers of both sexes (table III). Relative differences in mortality due to cancer and violent causes of death between social classes were larger among men than among women, otherwise differences were similar. Mortality among farmers was intermediate to that in white collar and unskilled blue collar workers.


TABLE III--Mortalities for specific causes adjusted for age per 1000 person years of follow up among eastern Finnish men and women aged 30-64
by social class. Figures are numbers (rate)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    Cause of death
                                      Person    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     years of        Coronary       Other cardiovascular               Violent    All other      All cause
Social class                       follow up       heart disease          diseases         Cancer      causes      causes        mortality
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 White collar workers               26 556           100 (5.0)            31 (1.6)         43 (2.2)    27 (1.1)    26 (1.2)     227 (11.1)
 Skilled blue collar workers        37 307           194 (6.4)            61 (2.1)         86 (3.0)    63 (1.7)    51 (1.7)     455 (14.8)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      16 451           119 (7.5)            44 (2.8)         69 (4.4)    48 (2.9)    37 (2.4)     317 (20.0)
 Farmers                            29 742           190 (5.6)            63 (1.9)         76 (2.2)    51 (1.8)    50 (1.6)     430 (13.0)
Women:
 White collar workers               42 736            29 (1.0)            22 (0.6)         51 (1.4)    10 (0.2)    15 (0.4)     127 (3.7)
 Skilled blue collar workers        25 082            34 (1.4)            27 (1.1)         40 (1.6)    12 (0.5)    20 (0.8)     133 (5.4)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      19 504            37 (1.7)            25 (1.1)         35 (1.6)    11 (0.5)    19 (0.9)     127 (5.8)
 Farmers                            37 638            64 (1.3)            57 (1.2)         70 (1.5)    11 (0.3)    31 (0.7)     233 (5.1)

In age adjusted analyses unskilled blue collar workers had 54% higher coronary mortality than white collar workers (hazard ratio 1.54; table IV). About one third of this excess mortality was associated with smoking. When serum cholesterol concentration and prevalence of hypertension were further adjusted for, the excess mortality among unskilled blue collar workers was reduced to 20%. Further adjustment for obesity and physical activity in leisure time had little effect. Among women adjustment for smoking widened the social class differences, especially for the female farmers. Further adjustment for other risk factors reduced the differences slightly below the age adjusted figures. Further adjustment for height, in addition to all the other risk factors analysed, reduced the hazard ratio in unskilled blue collar workers v white collar workers to 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.57) among men and to 1.57 (0.93 to 2.66) among women.


TABLE IV--Relative differences in mortality from coronary heart disease between social classes among 17829 eastern Finnish men and women
aged 30-64* with increasing adjustment for various risk factors
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)+ adjusted for
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     No                                                                                     Age, smoking, cholesterol,
                                     of                                   Age and              Age, smoking, cholesterol,    hypertension, body mass
Social class                       deaths            Age                  smoking                  and hypertension         index, and physical activity
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 White collar workers                95               1                      1                            1                              1
 Skilled blue collar workers        182      1.36 (1.06 to 1.74)    1.28 (1.00 to 1.64)          1.18 (0.92 to 1.51)            1.18 (0.92 to 1.52)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      108      1.54 (1.16 to 2.02)    1.32 (1.00 to 1.75)          1.20 (0.91 to 1.59)            1.22 (0.92 to 1.61)
 Farmers                            183      1.10 (0.86 to 1.41)    1.11 (0.86 to 1.42)          0.99 (0.77 to 1.28)            0.99 (0.76 to 1.27)

 P for global test++                                0.004                  0.12                          0.23                           0.18
 P for trend~                                       0.002                  0.07                          0.22                           0.23
Women:
 White collar workers                26               1                      1                             1                              1
 Skilled blue collar workers         28      1.26 (0.74 to 2.15)    1.28 (0.75 to 2.18)           1.25 (0.73 to 2.13)           1.14 (0.67 to 1.96)
 Unskilled blue collar workers       35      1.74 (1.05 to 2.90)    1.87 (1.12 to 3.12)           1.85 (1.11 to 3.09)           1.66 (0.99 to 2.79)
 Farmers                             60      1.29 (0.81 to 2.05)    1.54 (0.96 to 2.49)           1.44 (0.89 to 2.33)           1.24 (0.76 to 2.03)

 P for global test++                               0.20                    0.09                           0.11                          0.25
 P for trend~                                      0.04                    0.02                           0.02                          0.06
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Includes those subjects with no missing data on any of risk factors analysed.
+Relative mortality differences between social classes when adjusted only for age, then also for smoking, then also for serum cholesterol and hypertension,
then also for body mass index, body mass index squared, and leisure time physical activity. All models stratified by living area and year of examination.
++Significance of global test for heterogeneity of mortality differences between four social classes after adjustment for other factors.
~Significance of trend test, excluding farmers.

Among men differences in all cause mortality between social classes were larger than in mortality from coronary heart disease (table V). About one third of the excess mortality among the unskilled blue collar workers was associated with smoking. Only a minor proportion of the excess mortality among women in lower social classes was associated with the risk factors examined. Further adjustment for height, in addition to all the other risk factors analysed, reduced the hazard ratio in unskilled blue collar workers v white collar workers to 1.42 (1.18 to 1.71) among men and to 1.29 (0.99 to 1.69) among women.


TABLE V--Relative differences in all cause mortality between social classes among 17829 eastern Finnish men and women aged 30-64* with
increasing adjustment for various risk factors
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)+ adjusted for
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     No                                                                                     Age, smoking, cholesterol,
                                     of                                       Age and          Age, smoking, cholesterol,      hypertension, body mass
Social class                       deaths           Age                      smoking               and hypertension          index, and physical activity
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 White collar workers               211              1                          1                         1                           1
 Skilled blue collar workers        429      1.44 (1.22 to 1.70)     1.35 (1.15 to 1.59)         1.30 (1.10 to 1.54)          1.29 (1.09 to 1.52)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      282      1.86 (1.55 to 2.22)     1.60 (1.34 to 1.92)         1.53 (1.28 to 1.83)          1.47 (1.23 to 1.77)
 Farmers                            405      1.15 (0.97 to 1.36)     1.15 (0.97 to 1.36)         1.10 (0.93 to 1.30)          1.04 (0.88 to 1.24)

 P for global test++                               <0.001                  <0.001                      <0.001                       <0.001
 P for trend~                                      <0.001                  <0.001                      <0.001                       <0.001
Women:
 White collar workers               118               1                      1                            1                           1
 Skilled blue collar workers        122      1.36 (1.06 to 1.76)     1.36 (1.06 to 1.76)         1.34 (1.04 to 1.73)          1.27 (0.98 to 1.64)
 Unskilled blue collar workers      117      1.49 (1.15 to 1.92)     1.52 (1.17 to 1.97)         1.50 (1.15 to 1.94)          1.39 (1.07 to 1.81)
 Farmers                            217      1.23 (0.98 to 1.54)     1.33 (1.06 to 1.68)         1.28 (1.02 to 1.62)          1.14 (0.89 to 1.45)

 P for global test++                               0.02                    0.01                        0.02                          0.07
 P for trend~                                      0.003                   0.002                       0.003                         0.01
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Includes only those subjects with no missing data on any of risk factors analysed.
+Relative mortality differences between social classes when adjusted only for age, then also for smoking, then also for cholesterol and hypertension, then also
for body mass index, body mass index squared, and leisure time physical activity. All models stratified by living area and year of examination.
++Significance of global test for heterogeneity of mortality differences between four social classes after adjustment for other factors.
~Significance of trend test, excluding farmers.

The effects of smoking and social class on all cause mortality were also examined in a stratified analysis (table VI). Given the wide confidence intervals in several strata the associations of social class with all cause mortality were in general similar to the estimates in table V. The hazard ratios, however, tended to be smaller among men who were former smokers. Also, when we calculated risk ratios for smoking were calculated from the table, former smoking proved more harmful among white collar men (risk ratio 1.56) than among skilled (1.30) or unskilled (0.96) blue collar workers, which suggests residual confounding by socioeconomic status.


TABLE VI--Age adjusted associations of social class with all cause mortality among 17829 eastern Finnish
men and women aged 30-64* separately for never smokers, former smokers, and current smokers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  No of      No of    Mortality/1000 person     Hazard ratio+
Social class                      people     deaths           years+         (95% confidence interval)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Men:
 Never smokers:
  White collar workers             673         34            6.2                      1
  Skilled blue collar workers      688         47            7.4              1.27 (0.81 to 1.97)
  Unskilled blue collar workers    252         28           11.5              1.97 (1.19 to 3.25)
  Farmers                          783         78            7.8              1.20 (0.80 to 1.81)
 Former smokers:
  White collar workers             522         60            9.7                      1
  Skilled blue collar workers      693         79            9.6              0.99 (0.71 to 1.39)
  Unskilled blue collar workers    218         35           11.0              1.13 (0.74 to 1.71)
  Farmers                          531         90           10.6              1.00 (0.72 to 1.39)
 Current smokers:
  White collar workers             864        117           14.3                      1
  Skilled blue collar workers     1549        303           20.5              1.53 (1.24 to 1.90)
  Unskilled blue collar workers    789        219           24.0              1.75 (1.39 to 2.19)
  Farmers                         1017        237           17.9              1.21 (0.97 to 1.51)
Women++:
 Never smokers:
  White collar workers            2513         82            3.1                      1
  Skilled blue collar workers     1479         96            4.9              1.48 (1.10 to 1.99)
  Unskilled blue collar workers   1215         96            5.3              1.62 (1.21 to 2.19)
  Farmers                         2658        209            5.0              1.43 (1.11 to 1.86)
 Current smokers:
  White collar workers             486         29            6.5                      1
  Skilled blue collar workers      296         24            8.4              1.16 (0.67 to 2.00)
  Unskilled blue collar workers    182         20           10.1              1.44 (0.81 to 2.55)
  Farmers                           85          6            6.1              0.77 (0.32 to 1.87)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Same subjects included as in tables IV and V.
+Adjusted for age. Hazard ratios adjusted also for living area and year of examination by stratification.
++Former smokers excluded due to small number of deaths (12).

Discussion

The higher mortality due to most causes in the lower social classes has been shown repeatedly both in Finland3 4 6 as in other industrialised Western countries.19 20 Based on our results about half of the excess mortality among male unskilled blue collar workers in eastern Finland was associated with their more adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile. Among women a clearly smaller proportion of the association between social class and mortality was associated with the risk factors analysed.

Several previous prospective studies have examined this issue among middle aged men but none among women. In the Whitehall study of British civil servants the excess risk of coronary death in the lowest compared with the highest grade of employment was 170% (relative risk 2.7) when adjusted for age and 110% (relative risk 2.1) when adjusted also for other cardiovascular risk factors. Therefore, about one third of the excess mortality due to coronary heart disease in the lowest grade was associated with their more adverse risk factor profile.7 10 Similarly, an estimate of about one half can be derived from the population based British Regional Heart8 and Oslo studies5 and a study of United States employees,11 an estimate of about one third from a study in the former Soviet Union12 and from a cross sectional study in Scotland,14 and an estimate of about one quarter from a study in Sweden.9 In contrast, a Danish study suggested a very small effect of smoking,13 which in other studies has been the dominant factor.

Taken together the results from most of these studies are remarkably consistent given the small number of deaths in several studies and the differences in the association of social class with risk factors over time21 and place. For example, in the older British studies average serum cholesterol concentrations were higher in upper social classes7 8 in contrast within the present and other Scandinavian studies5 9 22 23 and the more recent Scottish study.14 It should therefore be clearly acknowleged that the associations of social class with risk factors and mortality are not universal but may change in time and place. Given this, it is surprising that several articles do not even mention the date of their baseline examination.

Among women adjustment for smoking increased the observed differences in social class especially among the female farmers, who rarely smoked. Overall, among women the excess mortality in the lower social classes had clearly less association with the risk factors studied than among men. Today in Finland the risk factors studied may explain more of the social class differences among women as currently more Finnish women in the lower classes smoke compared with women in the higher social classes.21 23 We also did not have information on the women's high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, which may be a more important risk factor than total cholesterol among women.24

The clear social class differences in height were also able to explain part of the differences in mortality. Height, however, reflects factors operating in early life that are no longer modifiable in adulthood.15

In the present analyses women's social class was primarily determined on their own present or past occupation not the husband's, as has been done in most studies.25 In the beginning of the 1970s about 60% of middle aged women were working in their own occupation in the present study areas.26 27 Also, previous analyses from Finland have shown that classification by either own or spouse's occupation has little effect on the occupational mortality differentials.28 Therefore, misclassification of the women's occupation is an unlikely explanation for the present findings. Farmers in the present classification are a very heterogenous group, and they cannot easily be placed in the more or less hierarchical classification of workers.2 Therefore farmers were excluded from the analyses with trend test but included in the overall comparisons.

Mortality was predicted by using factors which exert their influence at different levels of the hypothetical causal pathway that finally leads to death. When all these factors are entered in the analysis at the same time their relative importance is strongly influenced by the degree of measurement error in each variable.29 This makes it very hard to respond to the question of whether cardiovascular mortality is more strongly associated with social class than lifestyle. Such a distinction is not even very helpful as the socioeconomic status of a person and his or her lifestyle are so tightly linked.

The present estimate of the proportion of the association between social class and mortality that is mediated through risk factors may be either too low or too high. Including other risk factors, like haemostatic factors,30 in the analysis could have increased the power of the risk factors to "explain" mortality differences between social classes. Also having repeated measurements of the risk factors would have strengthened their association with mortality.31 On the other hand, we used only a single, broad measure of socioeconomic status. Therefore the social classes used are heterogeneous in respect to socioeconomic position and, for example, smoking can be related to socioeconmic position also within the social class categories.32 This suggestion is also supported by the present results. Use of several measures of socioeconomic position10 or a finer classification would probably have strengthened the association between socioeconomic status and mortality.

A sizeable part of the excess mortality in lower social classes seems to be mediated through the known cardiovascular risk factors. Therefore, it may be possible to narrow social class differences in health through improvements in health behaviour among the lower social classes. In accordance with the Health for All 2000 programme of the World Health Organisation one of the major aims of health policy in Finland is to narrow inequalities in health.33 Relative differences in mortality between social classes have, however, increased in Finland in the 1980s3 4 as in some other Western industrialised countries.19 34 At the same time educational differences in obesity in eastern Finland have increased among both sexes, and smoking among women has changed from a habit of the more educated in the 1970s to a habit of the less educated in the 1980s.21 In contrast, differences in serum cholesterol concentration and blood pressure have remained stable. This indicates that social class differences in mortality may not diminish in the future in Finland.

To decrease the health inequalities between socioeconomic groups present health promotion methods should be reformulated to take into account the needs and abilities of the lower social classes. This by itself will not be sufficient, but the increasing inequalities in health need to be dealt with at multiple levels, from general social policy to everyday practice.35 36

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

  1. Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. The size of mortality differences associated with educational leave in nine industrialized countries. Am J Public Health 1994;84:932-7. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. International variation in size of mortality differences associated with occupational status. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23: 742-50.
  3. Valkonen T, Martelin T, Rimpela A. Socio-economic mortality differences in Finland 1971-1985. Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland, 1990. (Studies 176.)
  4. Valkonen T. Trends in regional and socio-economic mortality differentials in Finland. International Journal of Health Sciences 1992;3:157-66.
  5. Holme I, Helgeland A, Hjermann I, Leren P, Lund-Larsen PG. Four-year mortality by some socioeconomic indicators: the Oslo Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980;34:48-52. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Salonen JT. Socioeconomic status and risk of cancer, cerebral stroke, and death due to coronary heart disease and any disease: a longitudinal study in eastern Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1982;36:294-7. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Inequalities in death-specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet 1984;i:1003-6.
  8. Pocock SJ, Shaper AG, Cook DG, Phillips AN, Walker M. Social class differences in ischaemic heart disease in British men. Lancet 1987;ii:197-201.
  9. Rosengren A, Wedel H, Wilhelmsen L. Coronary heart disease and mortality in middle aged men from different occupational classes in Sweden. BMJ 1988;297:1497-500.
  10. Davey Smith G, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Magnitude and causes of socioeconomic differentials in mortality: further evidence from the Whitehall study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990;44:265-70. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Liu K, Cedres LB, Stamler J, Dyer A, Stamler R, Nanas S, et al. Relationship of education to major risk factors and death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes. Findings of three Chicago epidemiologic studies. Circulation 1982;66:1308-14. [Free Full Text]
  12. Dennis BH, Zhukovsky GS, Shestov DB, Davis CE, Deev AD, Kim H, et al. The association of education with coronary heart disease mortality in the USSR lipid research clinics study. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:420-7. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F. Ischaemic heart disease incidence by social class and form of smoking: the Copenhagen male study--17 years' follow-up. J Intern Med 1992;231:477-83. [Medline]
  14. Woodward M, Shewry MC, Smith WCS, Tunstall-Pedoe H. Social status and coronary heart disease: results from the Scottish heart health study. Prev Med 1992;21:136-48. [Medline]
  15. Forsdahl A. Are poor living conditions in childhood and adolescence an important factor for arteriosclerotic heart disease? British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine 1977;31:91-4.
  16. Puska P, Tuomilehto J, Salonen J, Nissinen A, Virtamo J, Bjorkqvist S, et al. The North Karelia project: evaluation of a comprehensive community programme for control of cardiovascular diseases in North Karelia, Finland 1972-1977. Copenhagen: WHO/EURO, 1981.
  17. Salonen JT. Smoking and dietary fats in relation to estimated risk of myocardial infarction before and during a preventive community programme. Kuopio: University of Kuopio, 1980. (Series original reports 1/1980.)
  18. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical College 1972;34:187-220.
  19. Wing S, Dargent-Molina P, Casper M, Riggan W, Hayes CG, Tyroler HA. Changing association between community occupational structure and ischaemic heart disease mortality in the United States. Lancet 1987;ii: 1067-70.
  20. Townsend P, Davidson N, Whitehead M. The Black report and the health divide. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1988.
  21. Pekkanen J, Uutela A, Valkonen T, Vartiainen E, Tuomilehto J, Puska P. Coronary risk factor levels: differences between educational groups in 1972-1987 in eastern Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:144-9. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Holme I, Helgeland A, Hjermann I, Lund-Larsen PG, Leren P. Coronary risk factors and socioeconomic status. The Oslo study. Lancet 1976;ii:1396-8.
  23. Luoto R, Pekkanen J, Uutela A, Tuomilehto J. Cardiovascular risks and socioeconomic status: differences between men and women in Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48:348-54. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Crouse III JR. Gender, lipoproteins, diet, and cardiovascular risk. Lancet 1989;i:318-20.
  25. Arber S. Opening the "black box": inequalities in women's health. In: Abbott P, Payne G, eds. New directions in the sociology of health. Brighton: Falmer Press, 1990.
  26. Statistics Finland. Population and housing census 1970. Industry and industrial status. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, 1973. (Official statistics of Finland VI C:104.)
  27. Statistics Finland. Population and housing census 1975. Occupation and industry. Helsinki: Statistics Finland, 1978. (Official statistics of Finland VI C:105.)
  28. Martikainen PT. Socioeconomic mortality differentials in men and women according to own and spouse's characteristics in Finland. Sociology, Health and Illness (in press).
  29. Savitz EA, Baron AE. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1062-71. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Markowe HLJ, Marmot MG, Shipley MJ, Bulpitt CJ, Meade TW, Stirling Y, et al. Fibrinogen: a possible link between social class and coronary heart disease. BMJ 1985;291:1312-4.
  31. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton P, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. 1. Effects of prolonged differences in blood pressure--evidence from nine prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990;335:765-74. [Medline]
  32. Davey Smith G, Shipley MJ. Confounding of occupation and smoking: its magnitude and consequences. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:1297-300.
  33. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Health for all by the year 2000. The Finnish national strategy. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 1987.
  34. Marmot MG, McDowell ME. Mortality decline and widening social inequalities. Lancet 1986;ii:274-6.
  35. Adler NE, Boyce WT, Chesney MA, Folkman S, Syme SL. Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA 1993;269:3140-5. [Abstract]
  36. Mackenbach J. Tackling inequalities in health. BMJ 1995;310:1152-3. [Free Full Text]
(Acepted 26 June 1995)

    Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

    This article has been cited by other articles:

    • Mackenbach, J. P., Stirbu, I., Roskam, A.-J. R., Schaap, M. M., Menvielle, G., Leinsalu, M., Kunst, A. E., the European Union Working Group on Socioeconomic, (2008). Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries. NEJM 358: 2468-2481 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Arendt, J. N., Lauridsen, J. (2008). Do risk factors explain more of the social gradient in self-reported health when adjusting for baseline health?. Eur J Public Health 18: 131-137 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Harald, K, Koskinen, S, Jousilahti, P, Torppa, J, Vartiainen, E, Salomaa, V (2008). Changes in traditional risk factors no longer explain time trends in cardiovascular mortality and its socioeconomic differences. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62: 251-257 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Laaksonen, M., Talala, K., Martelin, T., Rahkonen, O., Roos, E., Helakorpi, S., Laatikainen, T., Prattala, R. (2008). Health behaviours as explanations for educational level differences in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a follow-up of 60 000 men and women over 23 years. Eur J Public Health 18: 38-43 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Thurston, R. C., Kubzansky, L. D. (2007). Multiple Sources of Psychosocial Disadvantage and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Psychosom. Med. 69: 748-755 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Woolf, S. H., Johnson, R. E., Phillips, R. L. Jr, Philipsen, M. (2007). Giving Everyone the Health of the Educated: An Examination of Whether Social Change Would Save More Lives Than Medical Advances. Am. J. Public Health 97: 679-683 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Kuper, H., Adami, H.-O., Theorell, T., Weiderpass, E. (2006). Psychosocial Determinants of Coronary Heart Disease in Middle-Aged Women: A Prospective Study in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol 164: 349-357 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Blakely, T., Wilson, N. (2005). The contribution of smoking to inequalities in mortality by education varies over time and by sex: two national cohort studies, 1981-84 and 1996-99. Int J Epidemiol 34: 1054-1062 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Thurston, R. C., Kubzansky, L. D., Kawachi, I., Berkman, L. F. (2005). Is the Association between Socioeconomic Position and Coronary Heart Disease Stronger in Women than in Men?. Am J Epidemiol 162: 57-65 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Khang, Y.-H., Kim, H. R. (2005). Explaining socioeconomic inequality in mortality among South Koreans: an examination of multiple pathways in a nationally representative longitudinal study. Int J Epidemiol 34: 630-637 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Ferrie, J., Martikainen, P, Shipley, M., Marmot, M. (2005). Self-reported economic difficulties and coronary events in men: evidence from the Whitehall II study. Int J Epidemiol 34: 640-648 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • van Oort, F. V A, van Lenthe, F. J, Mackenbach, J. P (2005). Material, psychosocial, and behavioural factors in the explanation of educational inequalities in mortality in the Netherlands. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 214-220 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Laaksonen, M., Roos, E., Rahkonen, O., Martikainen, P., Lahelma, E. (2005). Influence of material and behavioural factors on occupational class differences in health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 163-169 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Strand, B. H., Tverdal, A. (2004). Can cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle explain the educational inequalities in mortality from ischaemic heart disease and from other heart diseases? 26 year follow up of 50 000 Norwegian men and women. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 705-709 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Park, H. S., Oh, S. W., Cho, S.-I., Choi, W. H., Kim, Y. S. (2004). The metabolic syndrome and associated lifestyle factors among South Korean adults. Int J Epidemiol 33: 328-336 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Mustard, C A, Etches, J (2003). Gender differences in socioeconomic inequality in mortality. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 974-980 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Gilman, S E, Abrams, D B, Buka, S L (2003). Socioeconomic status over the life course and stages of cigarette use: initiation, regular use, and cessation. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 802-808 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Jousilahti, P, Salomaa, V, Rasi, V, Vahtera, E, Palosuo, T (2003). Association of markers of systemic inflammation, C reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and fibrinogen, with socioeconomic status. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57: 730-733 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Park, Y.-W., Zhu, S., Palaniappan, L., Heshka, S., Carnethon, M. R., Heymsfield, S. B. (2003). The Metabolic Syndrome: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factor Findings in the US Population From the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med 163: 427-436 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Mullner, M., Matthews, H., Altman, D. G. (2002). Reporting on Statistical Methods To Adjust for Confounding: A Cross-Sectional Survey. ANN INTERN MED 136: 122-126 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Kilander, L., Berglund, L., Boberg, M., Vessby, B., Lithell, H. (2001). Education, lifestyle factors and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. A 25-year follow-up of Swedish 50-year-old men. Int J Epidemiol 30: 1119-1126 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Salomaa, V, Miettinen, H, Niemela, M, Ketonen, M, Mahonen, M, Immonen-Raiha, P, Lehto, S, Vuorenmaa, T, Koskinen, S, Palomaki, P, Mustaniemi, H, Kaarsalo, E, Arstila, M, Torppa, J, Kuulasmaa, K, Puska, P, Pyorala, K, Tuomilehto, J (2001). Relation of socioeconomic position to the case fatality, prognosis and treatment of myocardial infarction events; the FINMONICA MI Register Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55: 475-482 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Heistaro, S, Jousilahti, P, Lahelma, E, Vartiainen, E, Puska, P (2001). Self rated health and mortality: a long term prospective study in eastern Finland. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55: 227-232 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Suadicani, P., Hein, H. O., Gyntelberg, F. (2001). Socioeconomic status and ischaemic heart disease mortality in middle-aged men: importance of the duration of follow-up. The Copenhagen Male Study. Int J Epidemiol 30: 248-255 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Andersen, L. B., Schnohr, P., Schroll, M., Hein, H. O. (2000). All-Cause Mortality Associated With Physical Activity During Leisure Time, Work, Sports, and Cycling to Work. Arch Intern Med 160: 1621-1628 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Salomaa, V., Niemela, M., Miettinen, H., Ketonen, M., Immonen-Raiha, P., Koskinen, S., Mahonen, M., Lehto, S., Vuorenmaa, T., Palomaki, P., Mustaniemi, H., Kaarsalo, E., Arstila, M., Torppa, J., Kuulasmaa, K., Puska, P., Pyorala, K., Tuomilehto, J. (2000). Relationship of Socioeconomic Status to the Incidence and Prehospital, 28-Day, and 1-Year Mortality Rates of Acute Coronary Events in the FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study. Circulation 101: 1913-1918 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Engström, G, Tydén, P, Berglund, G, Hansen, O, Hedblad, B, Janzon, L (2000). Incidence of myocardial infarction in women. A cohort study of risk factors and modifiers of effect. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54: 104-107 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Osler, M., Gerdes, L. U., Davidsen, M., Brønnum-Hansen, H., Madsen, M., Jørgensen, T., Schroll, M. (2000). Socioeconomic status and trends in risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in the Danish MONICA population, 1982-1992. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54: 108-113 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • Mukerji, V., Alpert, M. A., Mukerji, R., Mulekar, M., Mukerji, V. (1999). Relation of Occupation to Presence or Absence of Coronary Artery Disease: An Angiographic Study. ANGIOLOGY 50: 375-380 [Abstract]  
    • Martikainen, P. T, Marmot, M. G (1999). Socioeconomic differences in weight gain and determinants and consequences of coronary risk factors. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69: 719-726 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • MacIntyre, S., Hunt, K. (1997). Socio-economic Position, Gender and Health: How Do They Interact?. J Health Psychol 2: 315-334 [Abstract]  
    • Morrison, C., Woodward, M., Leslie, W., Tunstall-Pedoe, H. (1997). Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register. BMJ 314: 541-541 [Abstract] [Full text]  
    • (1996). Women and coronary heart disease. DTB 34: 28-30 [Abstract] [Full text]  



    Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
    Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
    Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview