BMJ 1997;315:149-153 (19 July)

Papers

Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer: pooled data from clinical trials

Elina Hemminki, research professor,a Klim McPherson, professor of public health epidemiology b

a National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Health Services Research Unit, PO Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland, b London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Health Promotion Unit (Department of Public Health and Policy), London WC1E 7HT

Correspondence to: Professor Hemminki


right arrow   Abstract
up arrowTop
dotAbstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences

Objective: To examine the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cancer from published clinical trials that studied other outcomes of postmenopausal hormone therapy as some surveys have suggested that it may decrease the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and increase the incidence of hormone dependent cancers.
Design: Trials that compared hormone therapy with placebo, no therapy, or vitamins and minerals in comparable groups of postmenopausal women and reported cardiovascular or cancer outcomes were searched from the literature.
Subjects: 22 trials with 4124 women were identified. In each group, the numbers of women with cardiovascular and cancer events were summed and divided by the numbers of women originally allocated to the groups.
Results: Data on cardiovascular events and cancer were usually given incidentally, either as a reason for dropping out of a study or in a list of adverse effects. The calculated odds ratios for women taking hormones versus those not taking hormones was 1.39 (95% confidence interval 0.48 to 3.95) for cardiovascular events without pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis and 1.64 (0.65 to 4.18) with them. It is unlikely that such results would have occurred if the true odds ratio were 0.7 or less. For cancers, the numbers of reported events were too low for a useful conclusion.
Conclusions: The results of these pooled data do not support the notion that postmenopausal hormone therapy prevents cardiovascular events.

Key messages

  • The results of these pooled data do not support the notion that postmenopausal hormone therapy prevents cardiovascular events

  • These results concern only short term effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and long term effects may be different

  • There have been hundreds of trials studying the impact of hormones on various physiological phenomena, laboratory values, osteoporosis, symptoms, or various health problems but few fully report adverse effects. Small trials would be useful in studying unintended effects if they were more systematically reported


right arrow   Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
dotIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences

Surveys suggest that postmenopausal hormone therapy (hormone replacement therapy) may decrease the incidence of cardiovascular diseases but increase the incidence of hormone dependent cancers—for example, breast cancer.1 2 3 4 5 6 These findings are of major public health importance, and trials have been mounted to verify them, specifically to exclude the possibility of selection bias.7 8 The results of these trials will not be available for some years, however, and current prescribing and use depend on individual interpretations of inadequate evidence and marketing factors. Surveys and observations of physicians show that many believe postmenopausal hormone therapy to be beneficial,9 10 11 12 and in some countries the treatment has become very common.13 14 15 16 Thus, further reliable information on health outcomes would be useful until the data from prospective trials are available.

We investigated the utility of information on cardiovascular events and cancer derived from published clinical trials studying other, short term, aspects of postmenopausal hormone therapy. This study was stimulated by the findings of the PEPI trial (the postmenopausal oestrogen/progestin interventions trial) on risk factors for heart disease.17 Its table on adverse experiences showed a higher incidence of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events among users of the hormones (2.1 events/100 women) than in the placebo group (no events). This difference is not significant but is in the opposite direction of the pooled results of epidemiological surveys.


right arrow   Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
dotMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences

We searched for randomised trials that compared hormone therapy with placebo, no therapy, or vitamins and minerals in comparable groups of postmenopausal women. Hormone therapy was defined as oestrogens, in any form, alone or together with progestin/progesterone. Women given other types of active substances were not included in the comparison group. Trials were searched from Medline (1989 to November 1995) and reference lists of various review articles, books, and articles found. Languages accepted were English, German, the Scandinavian languages, and Finnish.

After identifying a trial with a comparable no hormone group we checked for any information on cardiovascular events (such as cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular accident, ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction), thromboembolic events (pulmonary emboli, deep vein thrombi), superficial phlebitis or thrombophlebitis, and cancers (breast, uterine body, other including cervical cancer and unspecified). We had also planned to study other health outcomes (such as gall bladder disease, mental symptoms, migraine, uterine diseases) but the definitions turned out to be either vague or varying, and they were not included. Trials with three months or more of treatment (specifically saying "no adverse events" or "no drop outs due to adverse events") were included, and women from these trials contribute to the denominators. If the fate of all those who dropped out or the women lost to follow up was not clear, such a trial did not contribute to the denominator. Trials studying the acute effects of oestrogens (three months or less of treatment) and crossover trials with treatment for three months or less in the first cycle were excluded. Trials with women who had undergone oophorectomy were specified separately. With the exception of the trial by Nachtigall et al,18 cardiovascular and cancer outcomes were reported as incidental (reasons for drop outs or adverse effects). Such data were not given in summaries but required the reading of methods and results sections. Because of the large number of published studies on postmenopausal hormone therapy, we may have missed some pertinent trials, but this selection is unlikely to depend on the differential cardiovascular and cancer events by treatment groups.

We identified 22 pertinent trials (Appendix 1). Some trials—for example, the Danish trial from 1983-5—were included in several different reports, and their results were combined. Most trials concerned a very selective group of healthy women, but some included special subgroups. Because of the varying lengths of treatment, regimens used (see table 1), and the vagueness of describing health outcomes a formal meta-analysis was not carried out. Whether the data concerned numbers of patients or numbers of events was not always clear, but whenever possible, we took the numbers of patients. The number of women originally allocated to the groups was used as the denominator.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Details of numbers of women in trials of postmenopausal hormone therapy

Odds ratios (of the outcome in question with postmenopausal hormones divided by the outcome among controls) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated by summing the events and denominators of the trials. Two different P values were calculated for cardiovascular diseases. The first one gives the probability of obtaining the calculated odds ratio when 0.7 (a hypothetical benefit concluded from previous literature) is assumed.19 The second P value gives similar probability assuming the correct odds ratio to be 0.5.


right arrow   Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
dotResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences

The types and dosages varied in different studies and, with the exception of the PEPI trial17 and the trial by Speroff et al,20 the numbers of women were small (table 1). In most reports the data on cardiovascular events and cancer were given incidentally, without description of how the event was defined, when it was detected, or how serious it was. Often all reasons for drop outs were not specified but said to be "unrelated to treatment." Sometimes the timing of the event was given, especially if the event occurred very soon after the treatment. In most studies the data on cardiovascular events and cancers were available as reasons for dropping out and thus refer to numbers of patients. In the PEPI trial adverse events were given (110 events experienced by 97 women), and it is therefore possible that some women appear more than once in table 2.


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Numbers of women with events, with odds ratios and probability of finding observed odds ratio*

There were fewer women with cardiovascular and thromboembolic events in the groups who did not receive hormone therapy than in the groups who did (table 2). The 95% confidence interval includes 1, but, as shown by the P values, it is unlikely that such a finding would have been found if the true odds ratio was 0.7. The likelihood of finding of an odds ratio of 1.64, if the true odds ratio was 0.7, is 0.04.

To see how sensitive the odds ratios were for inclusion of different kinds of trials we calculated odds ratios for each outcome in three other ways: excluding trials with oophorectomised women; excluding the trial by Nachtigall et al18 (because the results of that trial differed from those of other trials notably); and also excluding the trials with less than one year of treatment. None of these calculations suggested that women receiving hormone therapy would have fewer cardiovascular events. In all analyses the difference in regard to thromboembolic events was larger than that for cardiovascular events.

Superficial thrombophlebitis was reported in only three trials. The incidence in the hormone group was higher in the PEPI trials and lower in the trial by Nachtigall et al18. Because reporting it as a reason for dropping out is less likely than for the more serious reasons it was not combined among the rest of thromboembolic diseases.

When we included all trials the rate of breast cancer was lower in the hormone group (table 2). Only four women with uterine cancer (two in both groups) were reported (odds ratio 0.58). The number of uterine cancers in the hormone groups, however, is probably underestimated. It was commonly reported that women were excluded because of irregular or continuous bleeding or sometimes endometrial hyperplasia was reported. But the cause of the bleeding or outcome of hyperplasia was not specified.


right arrow   Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
dotDiscussion
down arrowAppendix
down arrowReferences

The results of these pooled (mostly) randomised data do not support the notion that postmenopausal hormone therapy prevents cardiovascular events. It is unlikely that the calculated odds ratios would have been found if the true odds ratio was 0.7 or less. The numbers of women with events, however, as well as the total numbers of women were small.

There is no reason to believe that events were reported differently by group, but the absolute risk of adverse effects cannot be concluded. If the woman continued in the study an adverse effect would probably have remained unreported. Furthermore, in many trials women were lost to follow up, and even more trials gave no data on reasons or numbers of drop outs or losses to follow up. Most trials had selected only healthy women. Therefore the effects of postmenopausal therapy on sick women cannot be inferred from these results. This is especially noteworthy because currently many experts recommend hormone therapy for women either with cardiovascular diseases or those at high risk.

Our results concern short term effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy. It is quite possible that long term effects are different, both for cardiovascular diseases and for cancer. Short term effects on cardiovascular diseases are likely to occur through changes in blood viscosity, the arterial wall, and blood pressure and through cardiac arrhythmias. Long term effects—for example, because of blood lipids and various general physiological and psychological effects—may take years to have their impact. Breast cancer detected soon after a treatment—if it is related to the treatment—is likely to result from a promotion or activation of a pre-existing cancer. Carcinogenic effects or slower tumour promotion may take years or decades to show up.

The searches for this study revealed hundreds of trials studying the impact of hormones on various physiological phenomena, laboratory values, osteoporosis, symptoms, or health problems other than those of interest in this study. But usually they did not report adverse effects fully if at all. Pooled analyses, including meta-analysis, have greatly enhanced the usefulness of small trials in studying intended effects. The same could be true for adverse effects and other unintended effects, if they were always systematically reported.


right arrow   Acknowledgements

We thank Sirkku Nyyssonen and Henri Toukomaa for their help in collecting and analysing the data. We would appreciate references to relevant published or unpublished studies that we have missed.

Funding: No external funding.

Conflict of interest: None.


right arrow   Appendix
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
dotAppendix
down arrowReferences

Papers revealed by searches

A table describing the following trials is available from EH.

Aitken JM, Hart DM, Lindsay R. Oestrogen replacement therapy for prevention of osteoporosis after oophorectomy. BMJ 1973;iii:515-8.

Aloia JF, Vaswani A, Russo L, Sheehan M, Flaster E. The influence of menopause and hormonal replacement therapy on body cell mass and body fat mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:896-900.

Aloia JF, Vaswani A, Yeh JK, Ross PL, Flaster E, Dilmanian FA. Calcium supplementation with and without hormone replacement therapy to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:97-103.

Christiansen C, Christensen MS, McNair P, Hagen C, Stocklund K-E, Transbol IB. Prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss: controlled 2-year study in 315 normal females. Eur J Clin Invest 1980;10:273-79.

Christiansen C, Christensen MS, Rodbro P. Hagen C, Transbol I. Effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in itself or combined with hormone treatment in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Eur J Clin Invest 1981;11:305-309.

Christiansen C, Riis BJ. 170-estradiol and continuous norethisterone: a unique treatment for established osteoporosis in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;71:836-41.

Christensen MS, Hagen C, Christiansen C, Transbol IB. Dose-response evaluation of cyclic estrogen/gestagen in postmenopausal women: placebo-controlled trial of its gynecologic and metabolic actions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:873-9.

Coope J. Is oestrogen therapy effective in the treatment of menopausal depression? J R Coll Gen Pract 1981;31:134-40.

Derman RJ, Dawood MY, Stone, S. Quality of life during sequential hormone replacement therapy. A placebo-controlled study. Int J Fertil 1995;40:73-8.

Gallagher JC, Kable WT, Goldgar D. Effect of progestin therapy on cortical and trabecular bone: comparison with estrogen. Am J Med 1991;90:171-8.

Genant HK, Baylink DJ, Gallagher JC, Harris ST, Steiger P. Herber M. Effect of estrone sulfate on postmenopausal bone loss. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:579-84.

Hassager C, Christiansen C. Estrogen/gestagen therapy changes soft tissue body composition in postmenopausal women. Metabolism 1989;38:662-5.

Hassager C, Riis BJ, Strom V, Guyene TT, Christiansen C. The long-term effect of oral and percutaneous estradiol on plasma renin substrate and blood pressure. Circulation 1987;76:753-8.

Jensen J, Riis BJ, Strom V, Christiansen C. Long-term and withdrawal effects of two different oestrogen-progestogen combinations on lipid and lipoprotein profiles in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 1989;11:117-28.

Lindsay R, Hart DM, Clark DM. The minimum effective dose of estrogen for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:759-63.

Lufkin EG, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Hodgson SF, Kotowicz MA, Lane AW, et al. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with transdermal estrogen. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:1-9.

Marslew U, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Two new combinations of estrogen and progestogen for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss: long-term effects on bone, calcium and lipid metabolism, climacteric symptoms and bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:202-210.

Molander U, Milsom I, Ekelund P, Mellstrom D, Eriksson O. Effect of oral oestriol on vaginal flora and cytology and urogenital symptoms in the post-menopause. Maturitas 1990;12:113-120.

Munk-Jensen N. Pors Nielsen S. Obel EB, Bonne Eriksen P. Reversal of postmenopausal vertebral bone loss by oestrogen and progestogen: a double blind placebo controlled study. BMJ 1988;296:1150-2.

Munk-Jensen N. Ulrich LG, Obel EB, Nielsen SP, Edwards D, Meinertz H. Continuous combined and sequential estradiol and norethindrone acetate treatment of postmenopausal women: effect on plasma lipoproteins in a two-year placebo controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:132-8.

Nachtigall LE, Nachtigall RH, Nachtigall RD, Beckman EM. Estrogen replacement therapy. II. A prospective study in the relationship to carcinoma and cardiovascular and metabolic problems. Obstet Gynecol 1979;54:74-9.

Obel EB, Munk-Jensen N, Svenstrup B, Bennet P, Micic S, Henrik-Nielsen R, et al. A two-year double-blind controlled study of the clinical effect of combined and sequential postmenopausal replacement therapy and steroid metabolism during treatment. Maturitas 1993;16:13-21.

Resch H, Pietschmann P, Krexner E, Woloszczak W, Willvonseder R. Effects of one-year hormone replacement therapy on peripheral bone mineral content in patients with osteoporotic spine fractures. Acta Endocrinol 1990;123:14-8.

Riggs BL, Seeman E, Hodgson SF, Taves DR, O'Fallon WM. Effect of the fluoride/calcium regimen on vertebral fracture occurrence in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Comparison with conventional therapy. N Engl J Med 1982;306:446-50.

Riis BJ, Thomsen K, Strom V, Christiansen C. The effect of percutaneous estradiol and natural progesterone on postmenopausal bone loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:6165b.

Speroff L, Rowan J, Symons J, Genant H, Wilborn W. The comparative effect on bone density, endometrium, and lipids of continuous hormones as replacement therapy (CHART study). A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;276:1397-403.

Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Marslew U, Christiansen C. Changes in calcanean bone mineral occurring spontaneously and during hormone replacement therapy in early postmenopausal women. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1992;52:831-6.

Tonstad S, Ose L, Gorbitz C, Djoseland O, Bard, JM, Fruchart JC. Efficacy of sequential hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia among postmenopausal women. J Intern Med 1995;238:39-47.

Wimalawansa SJ. Combined therapy with estrogen and etidronate has an additive effect on bone mineral density in the hip and vertebrae: four-year randomised study. Am J Med 1995;99:36-42.

Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. JAMA 1995;273:199-208.


right arrow   References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
up arrowAppendix
dotReferences

  1. Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB, Fox CS, Black D, Ettinger B, et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:1016-37.
  2. WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1994.
  3. MacLennan S, MacLennan A, Ryan P. Colorectal cancer and oestrogen replacement therapy. A meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Med J Aust 1995;162:491-3. [Medline]
  4. Rodriguez C, Calle EE, Coates RJ, Miracle-McMahill HL, Thun MJ, Heath CW. Estrogen replacement therapy and fatal ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:828-35. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Colditz GA, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Willet WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1589-93.
  6. Office of Technology Assessment. Effectiveness and costs of osteoporosis screening and hormone replacement therapy. Washington: Congress of the United States, 1995.
  7. Petitti DB. Coronary heart disease and estrogen replacement therapy. Can compliance bias explain the results of observational studies? Ann Epidemiol 1994;4:115-8. [Medline]
  8. Vandenbroucke JP. How much of the cardioprotective effect of postmenopausal estrogens is real? Epidemiology 1995;6:207-8.
  9. Hemminki E, Topo P. Malin M, Kangas I. Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause. Maturitas 1993;16:163-73. [Medline]
  10. Barret-Connor E. Postmenopausal estrogens—current prescribing patterns of San Diego gynecologists. West J Med 1986;144:620-1. [Medline]
  11. Greendale GA, Carlson KJ, Schiff I. Estrogen and progestin therapy to prevent osteoporosis: attitudes and practices of general internists and gynecologists. J Gen Intern Med 1990;5:464-9.
  12. Backe B, Hunskaar S, Skolbekken JA. Menopause: a national survey in Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992;10:179-84.
  13. Harris RB, Laws A, Reddy VM, King A, Haskell WL. Are women using postmenopausal estrogens? A community survey. Am J Public Health 1990;80:1266-8. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Topo P, Koster A, Holte A, Collins A, Landgren B-M, Hemminki E, et al. Trends in the use of climacteric and postclimacteric hormones in Nordic countries. Maturitas 1995;22:89-95.
  15. Wysowski DK, Golden L, Burke L. Use of menopausal estrogens and medroxyprogesterone in the United States, 1982-1992. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:6-l0. [Abstract]
  16. Isaacs AJ, Britton AR, McPherson K. Utilisation of hormone replacement therapy by women doctors. BMJ 1995;311:1399-401.
  17. Writing group for the PEPI trial. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. JAMA 1995;273:199-208. [Abstract]
  18. Nachtigall LE, Nachtigall RH, Nachtigall RD, Beckman EM. Estrogen replacement therapy. II. A prospective study in the relationship to carcinoma and cardiovascular and metabolic problems. Obstet Gynecol 1979;54:74-9.
  19. Dixon WJ, ed. BMDP statistical software manual. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988:262-3.
  20. Speroff L, Rowan J. Symons J. Genant H. Wilborn W. The comparative effect on bone density, endometrium, and lipids of continuous hormones as replacement therapy (CHART study). A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;276:1397-403. [Abstract]
(Accepted 15 April 1997)

Related Article

Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer
Stephen Singleton, Kathryn Bailey, Sunil Shah, Leonaura Rhodes, Valerie Seagroatt, Torbjorn Sundkvist, Farook Al-Azzawi, John Thompson, Aidan Halligan, Nananda F Col, John B Wong, Stephen G Pauker, Richard Karas, and Elina Hemminki
BMJ 1997 315: 676. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Manson, J. E., Bassuk, S. S. (2007). Invited Commentary: Hormone Therapy and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Why Renew the Focus on the Early Years of Menopause?. Am J Epidemiol 166: 511-517 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E. (2007). Hormones and Heart Disease in Women: The Timing Hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol 166: 506-510 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Greiser, C. M., Greiser, E. M., Doren, M. (2005). Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update 11: 561-573 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Petitti, D. B., Freedman, D. A. (2005). Invited Commentary: How Far Can Epidemiologists Get with Statistical Adjustment?. Am J Epidemiol 162: 415-418 [Full text]  
  • HARMAN, S M., NAFTOLIN, F., BRINTON, E. A., JUDELSON, D. R. (2005). Is the Estrogen Controversy Over? Deconstructing the Women's Health Initiative Study: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1052: 43-56 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dubey, R. K., Imthurn, B., Barton, M., Jackson, E. K. (2005). Vascular consequences of menopause and hormone therapy: Importance of timing of treatment and type of estrogen. Cardiovasc Res 66: 295-306 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dubey, R. K., Imthurn, B., Zacharia, L. C., Jackson, E. K. (2004). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease: What Went Wrong and Where Do We Go From Here?. Hypertension 44: 789-795 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lexchin, J., Mintzes, B. (2004). Transparency in drug regulation: Mirage or oasis?. CMAJ 171: 1363-1365 [Full text]  
  • Nguyen, L., Liles, D. R., Lin, P. H., Bush, R. L. (2004). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Peripheral Vascular Disease in Women. VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 38: 547-556 [Abstract]  
  • (2004). Venous Thromboembolic Disease. Obstet Gynecol 104: 118S-127S [Full text]  
  • Petitti, D. (2004). Commentary: Hormone replacement therapy and coronary heart disease: four lessons. Int J Epidemiol 33: 461-463 [Full text]  
  • McPherson, K., Hemminki, E. (2004). Synthesising licensing data to assess drug safety. BMJ 328: 518-520 [Full text]  
  • Naylor, C. D. (2004). The Complex World of Prescribing Behavior. JAMA 291: 104-106 [Full text]  
  • SAMSIOE, G. (2003). HRT and Cardiovascular Disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 997: 358-372 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E. (2003). An Epidemiologist Looks at Hormones and Heart Disease in Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88: 4031-4042 [Full text]  
  • Manson, J. E., Hsia, J., Johnson, K. C., Rossouw, J. E., Assaf, A. R., Lasser, N. L., Trevisan, M., Black, H. R., Heckbert, S. R., Detrano, R., Strickland, O. L., Wong, N. D., Crouse, J. R., Stein, E., Cushman, M., the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, (2003). Estrogen plus Progestin and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. NEJM 349: 523-534 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Yilmazer, M., Fenkci, V., Fenkci, S., Aktepe, O., Sonmezer, M., Kurtay, G. (2003). Association of serum complement (C3, C4) and immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM) levels with hormone replacement therapy in healthy post-menopausal women. Hum Reprod 18: 1531-1535 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Michels, K. B., Manson, J. E. (2003). Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: A Reversal of Fortune. Circulation 107: 1830-1833 [Full text]  
  • Lawlor, D. (2002). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease. The Current Status of Research and Practice.: AR Genazzani. London UK, New York USA: The Parthenon Publishing Group, 2001, pp. 188, US$77.95 ISBN: 1 84214 038 8.. Int J Epidemiol 31: 1278-1279 [Full text]  
  • Pradhan, A. D., Manson, J. E., Rossouw, J. E., Siscovick, D. S., Mouton, C. P., Rifai, N., Wallace, R. B., Jackson, R. D., Pettinger, M. B., Ridker, P. M (2002). Inflammatory Biomarkers, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: Prospective Analysis From the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. JAMA 288: 980-987 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Nelson, H. D., Humphrey, L. L., Nygren, P., Teutsch, S. M., Allan, J. D. (2002). Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy: Scientific Review. JAMA 288: 872-881 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Humphrey, L. L., Chan, B. K.S., Sox, H. C. (2002). Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. ANN INTERN MED 137: 273-284 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Yusuf, S., Anand, S. (2002). Hormone replacement therapy: a time for pause. CMAJ 167: 357-359 [Full text]  
  • Sackett, D. L. (2002). The arrogance of preventive medicine. CMAJ 167: 363-364 [Full text]  
  • Bureau, I., Laporte, F., Favier, M., Faure, H., Fields, M., Favier, A. E., Roussel, A.-M. (2002). No Antioxidant Effect of Combined HRT on LDL Oxidizability and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Treated Post-Menopausal Women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21: 333-338 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Noller, K. L. (2002). Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Risk of Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 288: 368-369 [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E. (2002). Looking for the Pony in the HERS Data. Circulation 105: 902-903 [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E., Grady, D., Sashegyi, A., Anderson, P. W., Cox, D. A., Hoszowski, K., Rautaharju, P., Harper, K. D., for the MORE Investigators, (2002). Raloxifene and Cardiovascular Events in Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women: Four-Year Results From the MORE (Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation) Randomized Trial. JAMA 287: 847-857 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rossouw, J. E (2002). Hormones, genetic factors, and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 53: 550-557 [Full text]  
  • Rexrode, K. M., Manson, J. E. (2002). Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Quality of Life: No Cause for Celebration. JAMA 287: 641-642 [Full text]  
  • Pritchard, K. I. (2001). Hormone Replacement in Women with a History of Breast Cancer. The Oncologist 6: 353-362 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mosca, L., Collins, P., Herrington, D. M., Mendelsohn, M. E., Pasternak, R. C., Robertson, R. M., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Smith, S. C. Jr, Taubert, K. A., Wenger, N. K. (2001). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation 104: 499-503 [Full text]  
  • Heckbert, S. R., Kaplan, R. C., Weiss, N. S., Psaty, B. M., Lin, D., Furberg, C. D., Starr, J. R., Anderson, G. D., LaCroix, A. Z. (2001). Risk of Recurrent Coronary Events in Relation to Use and Recent Initiation of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy. Arch Intern Med 161: 1709-1713 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Manson, J. E., Martin, K. A. (2001). Postmenopausal Hormone-Replacement Therapy. NEJM 345: 34-40 [Full text]  
  • Grady, D., Hulley, S. B. (2001). Postmenopausal hormones and heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 8-10 [Full text]  
  • Torgerson, D. J., Bell-Syer, S. E. M. (2001). Hormone Replacement Therapy and Prevention of Nonvertebral Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. JAMA 285: 2891-2897 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E., Stuenkel, C. A (2001). Hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-- risks and benefits. Int J Epidemiol 30: 423-426 [Full text]  
  • Rebar, R. W., Archer, D., Blakely, J. A. (2001). Increased Coronary Events, HERS, and HRT: Any Connection?. Arch Intern Med 161: 1350-1351 [Full text]  
  • Angerer, P., Stork, S., Kothny, W., Schmitt, P., von Schacky, C. (2001). Effect of Oral Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement on Progression of Atherosclerosis : A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 21: 262-268 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Angerer, P., Kothny, W., Stork, S., von Schacky, C. (2000). Hormone replacement therapy and distensibility of carotid arteries in postmenopausal women: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 36: 1789-1796 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Blakely, J. A. (2000). The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Revisited: Hormone Replacement Therapy Produced Net Harm, Consistent With the Observational Data. Arch Intern Med 160: 2897-2900 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mosca, L. (2000). The Role of Hormone Replacement Therapy in the Prevention of Postmenopausal Heart Disease. Arch Intern Med 160: 2263-2272 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hemminki, E. (2000). Hormone replacement therapy: discrepancies between evidence and recommendations. Scand J Public Health 28: 81-83 [Abstract]  
  • Fioretti, F., Tavani, A., Gallus, S., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C. (2000). Menopause and risk of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction: an Italian case-control study and a review of the literature. Hum Reprod 15: 599-603 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McNagny, S. E. (1999). Prescribing Hormone Replacement Therapy for Menopausal Symptoms. ANN INTERN MED 131: 605-616 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Giltay, E. J., Lambert, J., Gooren, L. J. G., Elbers, J. M. H., Steyn, M., Stehouwer, C. D. A. (1999). Sex Steroids, Insulin, and Arterial Stiffness in Women and Men. Hypertension 34: 590-597 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Herrington, D.M., Furberg, C.D. (1999). Hormone therapy: time for replacement?. Eur Heart J 20: 1285-1286  
  • Cushman, M., Legault, C., Barrett-Connor, E., Stefanick, M. L., Kessler, C., Judd, H. L., Sakkinen, P. A., Tracy, R. P. (1999). Effect of Postmenopausal Hormones on Inflammation-Sensitive Proteins : The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Study. Circulation 100: 717-722 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E., Stuenkel, C. (1999). Hormones and Heart Disease in Women: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study in Perspective. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84: 1848-1853 [Full text]  
  • Cushman, M., Meilahn, E. N., Psaty, B. M., Kuller, L. H., Dobs, A. S., Tracy, R. P. (1999). Hormone Replacement Therapy, Inflammation, and Hemostasis in Elderly Women. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 19: 893-899 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hulley, S., Grady, D., Bush, T., Furberg, C., Herrington, D., Riggs, B., Vittinghoff, E., for the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement S, (1998). Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Women. JAMA 280: 605-613 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barrett-Connor, E. (1998). Fortnightly review: Hormone replacement therapy. BMJ 317: 457-461 [Full text]  
  • British Cardiac Society, , British Hyperlipidaemia Association, , British Hypertension Society, , endorsed by the British Diabetic Association, (1998). Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Heart 80: 1S-29 [Full text]  
  • Fossel, M. (1998). Telomerase and the Aging Cell: Implications for Human Health. JAMA 279: 1732-1735 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rifkind, B. M., Rossouw, J. E. (1998). Of Designer Drugs, Magic Bullets, and Gold Standards. JAMA 279: 1483-1485 [Full text]  
  • Naylor, C D. (1997). Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research. BMJ 315: 617-619 [Full text]  
  • Singleton, S., Bailey, K., Shah, S., Rhodes, L., Seagroatt, V., Sundkvist, T., Al-Azzawi, F., Thompson, J., Halligan, A., Col, N. F, Wong, J. B, Pauker, S. G, Karas, R., Hemminki, E. (1997). Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer. BMJ 315: 676-676 [Full text]  
  • (1997). ERT AND CAD: SURPRISING RESULTS FROM POOLED DATA. JWatch General 1997: 6-6 [Full text]  

Online poll
Find out more

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.


Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview