Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Personality disorders are widespread and present a major challenge in most areas of health care. They can be difficult to treat, complicate the management and adversely affect the outcome of other conditions, and exert a disproportionate effect on the workload of staff dealing with them. Finding appropriate placement for sufferers can cause difficulties for doctors and the courts.
| Definition and classification |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Definition
The study of the personality disorders has been beset by problems, and, as a result, the use
of such diagnoses is often questioned. The World Health Organisation defines these conditions
as comprising "deeply ingrained and enduring behaviour patterns, manifesting themselves
as inflexible responses to a broad range of personal and social situations."
They are associated with ways of thinking, perceiving, and responding emotionally that differ substantially from those generally accepted within a patient's culture. As a result, patients tend to exhibit a severely limited repertoire of stereotyped responses in diverse social and personal contexts. These patterns are usually evident during late childhood or adolescence, but the requirement to establish their stability and persistence restricts the use of the term "disorder" to adults.
Classification
There are two main approaches to classificationdimensional and
categorical.
|
Problems in defining personality disorders
|
Dimensional classificationThis defines the degree to which a person displays each of a number of personality traits and behavioural problems. This approach is proving useful in investigating the biochemical underpinnings of many of these disorders.
Categorical classificationThis, the basis of the major clinical systems for classifying mental disorders, assumes the existence of distinct types of personality disorder with distinctive features. The World Health Organisation's classification of personality disorders has undergone much revision in the past 20 years and has been complicated by the recent addition of behavioural syndromes such as pathological gambling and kleptomania.
|
World Health Organisation's classification of personality
disorders* F60 Specific personality disorders ParanoidIncludes formerly used categories of sensitive and querulant personality SchizoidDistinct from schizotypal disorder, which is related to schizophrenia DissocialFormerly called antisocial, asocial, psychopathic, or sociopathic personality Emotionally unstableIncludes impulsive (explosive) and borderline types HistrionicFormerly hysterical personality AnankasticFormerly obsessional personality AnxiousAlso called avoidant personality DependentFormerly asthenic, inadequate, or passive personality F61 Mixed personality disorders F62 Enduring personality changes Includes permanent changes after catastrophic experiences (such as hostage taking, torture, or other disaster) or severe mental illness, but excludes changes due to brain damage F63 Habit and impulse disorders Includes pathological gambling, fire setting (pyromania), stealing (kleptomania), hair pulling (trichotillomania), and others F68 Other disorders of personality A mixed category including elaboration of physical symptoms for psychological reasons and intentional production of symptoms (factitious disorder) F21 Schizotypal disorder This category is included for completeness, but it is best avoided as its status as a variant of schizophrenia or of personality disorder is not clear *ICD-10 (international classification of diseases, 10th edition). This no longer recognises some previously used descriptions of personality disorder as distinct categories. These include eccentric, immature, narcissistic, and passive-aggressive types
|
| Epidemiology and aetiology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Possible causes of personality disorders
|
In Britain the prevalence of personality disorder ranges from 2% to 13% in the general population, and the prevalence is higher in institutional settings (such as in hospitals, residential settings, and prisons). Some diagnoses are made more commonly in men (such as dissocial personality disorder), while others are more common in women (such as histrionic and borderline personality disorders). Some common forms of presentation should prompt consideration of an underlying personality disorder: the association between dissocial personality disorder and alcohol and substance misuse is particularly important.
There are both biological and psychosocial theories of the aetiology of personality and behavioural disorders. Biological and psychosocial theories are not mutually exclusive, and many have contributed to treatment strategies.
| Diagnosis of personality disorder |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Prerequisites for diagnosis of personality disorder Patient displays a pattern of ...
which is ...
and leads to ...
but is not attributable to
|
It is generally agreed that the diagnosis of personality disorder of any type should not be made unless certain conditions are met. For practical purposes, these disorders are often grouped into three clusters that share clinical features:
Cluster APatients often seem odd or eccentric (such as paranoid or schizoid). Schizotypal disorder is often included in this cluster
Cluster BPatients may seem dramatic, emotional, or erratic (such as dissocial, histrionic, or borderline type of emotionally unstable personality)
Cluster CPatients present as anxious or fearful (such as dependent, anxious, anankastic).
Further complications arise because dissocial personality disorder (in the guise of psychopathic disorder or psychopathy) is included in the Mental Health Act 1983 and, if thought to be treatable, can be the basis for compulsory admission to hospital. It is variously defined but can be regarded as a severe example of a cluster B personality disorder.
| Assessment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients with personality disorder may present in various ways. Some behaviours suggestive of personality disorder may be overt (such as extreme aggression), but others may be subtle (such as pronounced difficulty in assertiveness or avoidance behaviour). Temporary reactions to particular circumstances do not justify a diagnosis of personality disorder.
|
Common presentations of personality disorder
|
|
General practitioners, who may have known a patient since childhood, are in a good
position to distinguish between transient and enduring patterns of behaviour
|
Problems presenting for the first time in adulthood may point to a functional or an organic mental illness. A collateral history from a relative or close friend is useful in distinguishing personality traits from mental illness. Patients' social circumstances need to be considered in order to identify solutions to immediate crises. Time spent on the presenting problem may help patients to identify solutions for themselves.
|
Assessment In addition to routine psychiatric assessment, in cases of suspected personality disorder particular attention should be paid to the following:
|
It is important to differentiate personality disorders in cluster A from psychotic mental illness, and personality disorders in cluster C from anxiety and depression whenever possible. However, personality disorder commonly coexists with mental disorder, and a patient may have symptoms of both. Thus, the inclination to withdraw all treatment and support once a personality disorder is suspected should be resisted. Diagnostic uncertainty is an indication for referral to specialist mental health services.
People suffering from personality disorders in cluster B commonly present with aggressive behaviour. Any history of abuse or behavioural disturbance in childhood should be elicited, and details taken of episodes of violence in public and at home, offending or criminal behaviour, and any experiences of imprisonment. Ideas or threats of harm to self or others should be openly discussed and carefully recorded.
|
Personality function must be assessed independently of current mental state
|
| Intervention |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The basic principles of intervention include a clear consistent approach, with offers of help being made and delivered within realistic limits. The stance is one of helping patients with their problems without being cast into extreme positions (often as either the "ideal" professional or the "useless" one) or reinforcing avoidance and dependence by denying patients the opportunity to assume responsibility for their actions.
|
General principles of intervention
Problem solving abilities in the short run Motivation for change in the long run
|
|
Specific measures for intervention Treat comorbid mental or physical illness Consider specific drug treatment
Consider specific psychological treatments
|
Inevitably, attempting to help a person who has difficulty in forming relationships may be hampered by that difficulty. When several professionals are involved, who is doing what and to what end must be communicated clearly between the professionals and, most importantly, to the patient. Ultimately, developing a working relationship and enhancing the motivation for change are the main foundations of any specific intervention to change behaviour. When these conditions are not met, simple problem solving and recognising and reinforcing individual patients' capacity to change their immediate situation at times of crisis may be useful.
Specific measures
When another disorder coexists the intervention should initially be directed at this but
working within the general framework given above. Referral to a specialist service may be
indicated for specific problems (such as substance misuse and eating disorder).
|
Self help organisations
|
Drug treatmentDepot antipsychotic drugs have been reported to benefit patients who harm themselves impulsively, and those who display symptoms suggestive (but falling short) of frank psychotic illness. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been used in patients with borderline personality disorder to reported good effect. However, these interventions are not supported by much research evidence, and the benefits of any drug must be weighed against the risk of side effects and toxicity in overdose. Full discussion with individual patients is needed before embarking on such interventions.
Psychosocial interventionGroup and family psychotherapy have their proponents in treating disorders in cluster B on an outpatient basis, but individual cognitive or psychodynamic psychotherapy is usually preferred. Assertiveness training, anxiety management, and behavioural approaches may be useful with disorders in cluster C, as may short term, focused psychotherapy.
|
Managing deliberate self harm
|
There is no clear consensus as to the best management of deliberate self harm in patients with personality disorder. While admission to a general psychiatric hospital may provide apparent safety, security, and containment, self harming may actually worsenparticularly if the admission is unfocused, not part of an overall plan, and the staff have little experience in dealing with problem.
Aggressive behaviour
In various patient groups aggressive behaviour has been shown to respond to carefully
monitored carbamazepine treatment. This is especially true of patients in whom there are
associated features such as a history of head injury, genuine amnesia for assaults, the
déjà vu phenomenon, olfactory hallucinations, and abnormalities shown by
electroencephalography or brain imaging.
Psychological techniques for managing anger are useful for patients who are able to tolerate a therapeutic environment and to discuss their own behaviour. The key issue is to identify triggering situations and the automatic patterns of thought that precede an outburst of aggression.
|
Dealing with aggressive patients
|
Clinicians who deal with aggressive patients should take basic safety precautions such as not seeing patients in isolated areas and ensuring the availability of alarm systems. More importantly, they should never criticise or admonish such patients and should always try to appear relaxed whatever feelings a patient may engender. Training in break away techniquesphysical manoeuvres to escape from an assaultis helpful in maintaining confidence. The boundaries of acceptable and unacceptable behaviour should be clearly explained to patients in the context of helping them to avoid getting into difficulty.
|
Further reading American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994 Dolan B, Coid J, eds. Psychopathic and antisocial personality disorders: treatment and research issues. London: Gaskell, 1993 Tyrer P, Stein G, eds. Personality disorder reviewed. London: Gaskell, 1993 World Health Organisation. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 1992
|
| Notes |
|---|
The artwork is by John Paul Genzo and reproduced with permission of the
Stock Illustration Source.
Martin Marlowe is a consultant psychiatrist at South Kent Community Healthcare NHS
Trust. Philip Sugarman is clinical director of Kent Forensic Psychiatry Service.
The ABC of mental health is edited by Teifion Davies, senior lecturer in community
psychiatry, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas's Hospital, London, and
honorary consultant psychiatrist, Lambeth Healthcare NHS Trust, and T K J Craig, professor of
community psychiatry, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas's
Hospital.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+