Patients' assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis
BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1305a (Published 15 November 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:1305Most patients have difficulty in rating themselves on visual analogue scales
- Caroline E Selai, Research psychologista,
- Michael R Trimble, Professor in behavioural neurologya
- a Institute of Neurology, London WCIN 3BQ
- b Neurosciences Trial Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
- c Department of Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE
Editor—The recent finding that patients' self assessments on a visual analogue scale did not correlate with other measures of disability in multiple sclerosis comes as no surprise to us.1 Visual analogue scales, which are used widely in studies of health status and quality of life, ask patients to rate themselves on a calibrated scale, usually from 0 to 100. The language of the end points or anchors of the scale varies, but, usually, 100 represents best possible health or quality of life and 0 represents the worst possible health or quality of life. In our experience, of several hundred interviews with patients with neurological disorders (epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, Gilles …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.