Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR Successful diagnosis of D fragilis is closely
associated with the use of stained faecal smears. After using a
suitable faecal stain as part of our routine methodology we found
D fragilis to be the most common enteropathogen
(occurring in 5.1% of faecal samples) in the Sultanate of
Oman.3 A similar incidence (5.0%) has been reported
recently among American soldiers stationed in Egypt.4 In
the United Kingdom, however, few laboratories stain faecal smears. The
laboratory reports of the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre show
that in 1992, 68 cases of D fragilis infection were
reported from seven laboratories and that by 1996 this figure had
increased to 231 cases reported from 20 laboratories (unpublished
data). These results reflect an increase in the number of laboratories
performing faecal stains. It can be assumed, however, that the true
incidence of D fragilis infection is many times higher:
there are an estimated 450 diagnostic laboratories in the United
Kingdom, most of which do not look for this pathogen.
Clinicians should add dientamoebiasis to their differential diagnosis
in patients presenting with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, unexplained
flatulence, nausea, and vomiting. Indeed, requests from clinicians to
their laboratories to look for this organism will result in this
neglected pathogen taking its rightful place alongside the more
established enteropathogens. Ultimately, patients will be the true beneficiaries.
Dientamoeba fragilis was first described by
Jepps and Dobell in 19181 and has subsequently been shown
to be an important enteric pathogen. It is therefore surprising that
only a few laboratories look for this pathogen. D
fragilis infections are effectively treated with
di-iodohydroxyquinoline or tetracyline.2 In contrast, no treatment is available for Cryptosporidium spp, which
most laboratories screen for routinely.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of
Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 35, Muscat 123, Sultanate of Oman jeffjoewindsor{at}hotmail.com
E H Johnson
Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of
Agriculture, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 34, Muscat 123
© BMJ 1999