Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Clare Dyer 144
Four UK tobacco companies went to the House of Lords yesterday to try
to stop the government going ahead with a ban on tobacco advertising
before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg rules on the issue
late this year or early next year.
Gallaher, Rothmans UK, British American Tobacco, and Imperial asked
five law lords to overturn an appeal court ruling last December which
said that UK regulations implementing the ban could go ahead.
Ministers had hoped that the regulations would come into force last
January, with phased withdrawal of advertising. But an injunction
imposed by the appeal court pending the Lords hearing has stopped them
proceeding with the ban.
Jonathan Sumption QC, for the tobacco companies, urged the five law
lords to reverse a Court of Appeal decision in the government's favour
and reimpose an injunction blocking the introduction of the ban until
after the European Court has ruled on the legality of the European
directive on tobacco advertising. The UK regulations had been drawn up
as part of the European directive.
Mr Sumption said that the European challenge was highly likely to
succeed and it would be wrong to allow the government to proceed in the
meantime. The date set for member states to implement the directive was
31 July 2000 and there was no need for the government to "jump the gun."
He said that the ban would involve restrictions and criminal sanctions
on individuals, including tobacconists, and on manufacturers. It would
be impossible to compensate them in damages if the Luxembourg court
later ruled that the directive was invalid.
The appeal, which the government is strongly contesting, finished
hearing this week, and judgment is expected in June.
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+