Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
The patient should be the judge of patient centred care
Key messages about patient centred care can be drawn
from the paper by Little et al in this issue of the BMJ
(p 468).1 Firstly, strong agreement exists between the
definition of patient centredness that arises empirically from this
observational study of patients in the United Kingdom and another
definition arising from reflections on practice in South Africa and
Canada,2 suggesting an international definition of patient
centred medicine. Secondly, the premise of the observational study is
correct Patient centredness is becoming a widely used, but poorly understood,
concept in medical practice. It may be most commonly understood for
what it is not Acknowledging these limitations, researchers seek answers to crucial
questions about patient centred medicine. What is it? Do patients want
it? Do doctors practise it? What are its benefits? Little et al focus
on the first two questions.1 Their results indicate that
the answer to the second question is a resounding "yes." Patients
want patient centred care which (a) explores the patients'
main reason for the visit, concerns, and need for information; (b) seeks an integrated understanding of the patients'
world Regarding the question whether doctors practise patient centred
care, data indicate that doctors vary but on the whole provide most
patients with partially patient centred care. Specifically, the average
patient centred score on a scale of 0-100 is 50.7 (SD 17.9, range
8-93).3 Some doctors are very patient centred and show a
wide range of scores, indicating a flexible style. Many others are not
very patient centred and show a narrow range of scores, indicating a
fixed style.4 There is also evidence of tangible benefit:
patient centred communication is positively associated with patient
satisfaction, adherence, and better health outcomes.5
A systematic search of Medline for the terms "patient centred
(centered) approach" or "patient centredness (centeredness)" in
1995-2000 identified 65 papers. Four additional papers were identified
through searching authors' names for the years 1995-2000, from a
recent conference (international conference on health and communication
for health professionals, educators and researchers, Barcelona,
September 2000), and the reference list of Little et al.1
Of the 69 papers, 55% were research papers, 35% on theory, 7% on
education, and 3% descriptions of programmes. Of the 38 research
papers five were randomised intervention studies; six measured health
outcomes; and 22 measured patient centredness (eight by direct
observation, six by patient perception questionnaire,6-11 one by both direct observation and patient perception
questionnaire,12 five by assessing physician or student
experiences, and two through a patient centred intervention only). The
69 papers originated from the UK (21), the United States (19), Norway
(5), Italy (5), Canada (5), South Africa (3), Australia (3), and
Germany (2), with one each from Israel, Netherlands, Finland, Spain,
Belgium, and one unknown. In the Cochrane consumers and communication
group no review has been conducted on the patient centred approach.
Patient perceptions of patient centredness are important to study. The
Medline search indicated that most educators and researchers focused
solely on experts' ratings of observed behaviour in clinical encounters. However, in one study of both observation of the clinical encounter and patient perceptions the patients' perception of the
patient centredness of the interaction was the stronger predictor not
only of health outcomes but also of efficiency of health care (fewer
diagnostic tests and fewer referrals).2 This can be described as the ultimate patient centred finding: the patients', not
the experts', views on patient centredness predicted important outcomes.
Two common misunderstandings about patient centred medicine may be
perpetuated by Little et al's study. Firstly, they and others they
cite8 expressed concerns that patients "may not prefer a
patient centred approach" and hence its universal adoption would be
"unwise." This concern rests on the misconception that being
patient centred means sharing all information and all decisions. Being
patient centred actually means taking into account the patient's desire for information and for sharing decision making and responding appropriately. Secondly, the basic question of Little et al's study
(Do all patients in primary care want all components of patient
centredness?) implies that patient centred care can be neatly separated
into divisible parts. The patients' responses indicated, in contrast,
that they uniformly valued all aspects of patient centredness. Further,
although components are used for ease in teaching and research, patient
centred clinical practice is a holistic concept in which components
interact and unite in a unique way in each patient-doctor encounter.
Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family
Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
N6A 5C1 (moira{at}julian.uwo.ca)
that the best way of measuring patient centredness is an
assessment made by the patients themselves.
technology centred, doctor centred, hospital centred,
disease centred. Definitions of patient centred care seek to make the
implicit in patient care explicit. Such definitions are, we recognise,
oversimplifications which help in teaching and research but fail to
capture the indivisible whole of a healing relationship. Perhaps
qualitative research comes closer to conveying the qualities of such care.
that is, their whole person, emotional needs, and life issues;
(c) finds common ground on what the problem is and mutually
agrees on management; (d) enhances prevention and health
promotion; and (e) enhances the continuing relationship
between the patient and the doctor. Here, then, is the beginning of a
truly international definition, based on both British patients' views
and the reflections of clinicians from South Africa and
Canada.2 Interestingly, a comparison of the observational
study by Little et al1 with the conceptual framework put
together by our group in 19952 showed that the
observational study strongly supports the conceptual framework.
Specifically, 13 of 19 items created by Little et al grouped together
as expected according to Stewart et al2 (see table on
bmj.com).
Footnotes
An additional table appears on the
BMJ's website
| 1. |
Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, et al.
Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study.
BMJ
2001;
322:
468-472 |
| 2. | Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centred medicine transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995. |
| 3. | Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 796-804[Medline]. |
| 4. | Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW. Patient-centred interviewing part III: five provocative questions. Can Fam Phys 1989; 35: 159-161. |
| 5. | Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 152: 1423-1433[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1644-1651[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Woodcock AJ, Kinmonth AL, Campbell MJ, Griffin SJ, Spiegal NM. Diabetes care from diagnosis: effects of training in patient-centred care on beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of primary care professionals. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 37: 65-79[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Boyer MJ, Findlow R, et al. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psycho-oncology 2000; 9: 147-155[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. |
Laerum E, Steine S, Finset A, Lundevall S.
Complex health problems in general practice: do we need an instrument for consultation improvement and patient involvement? Theoretical foundation, development and user evaluation of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS).
Fam Pract
1998;
15:
172-181 |
| 10. | Malterud K, Hollnagel H. Women's self-assessed personal health resources. Scand J Primary Health Care 1997; 15: 163-168[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ.
Randomised control trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care from Diagnosis Research Team.
BMJ
1998;
317:
1202-1208 |
| 12. | Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 829-840. |
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+