Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
DP Dearnaley Academic
Unit of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT
Correspondence to: DP Dearnaley davidd{at}icr.ac.uk
Germ cell tumours of the testis are the commonest
malignancy in men aged 20-40 years. Considerable therapeutic
improvements in management
Much of the clinical management discussed in this review is based
on the guidelines of the UK's Clinical Oncology Information Network,
which were developed with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines
Network.1 These were based on a systematic review of
clinical data including prospective phase III randomised trials performed internationally. The sections that discuss causes, follow up,
and future developments reflect our research interests and personal experience.
Testicular germ cell tumours
based on the cancer's responsiveness to
chemotherapy that contains platinum
mean that over 95% of
these patients can now expect to be cured.
Summary points
Testicular cancer is the most common cancer in younger men
The incidence has been increasing by 15-20% in successive five year
periods
Clinical trials organised by the UK's Medical Research Council and
other international groups have defined modern clinical practice
Cure rates of >95% can be achieved
Advanced and recurrent cancers should be treated by multidisciplinary
teams in specialist centres
![]()
Methods
Top
Methods
Incidence and aetiology
Pathology
Presentation and referral
Diagnosis, treatment, and...
Managing stage I disease
Treating metastatic disease
Follow up
Future developments
References
![]()
Incidence and aetiology
Top
Methods
Incidence and aetiology
Pathology
Presentation and referral
Diagnosis, treatment, and...
Managing stage I disease
Treating metastatic disease
Follow up
Future developments
References
Testicular germ cell tumours are uncommon cancers; they
account for around 1% of all cancers in males. About 1400 new cases
are diagnosed in the United Kingdom each year. Germ cell tumours have a
unique epidemiological profile for a solid tumour. Their peak incidence
occurs among men aged 25-35 years, and there is a distinctive
geographical and racial variation. The highest incidence is among white
men in northern Europe.
3.8 if orchiectomy was not
performed.5 Other abnormalities such as infantile
hernia
which had a relative risk of 1.9 in the same study
and low
birth weight
a relative risk of 2.66
have also been
linked to testicular cancer. Whether testicular maldescent and
testicular abnormalities directly cause testicular cancers or share
similar environmental or genetic factors, or both, remains uncertain.
Families in which maldescent occurs are more likely to carry a mutation
in the Xq27 region.
Little is known about the gene or genes that cause testicular germ cell
tumours although amplification of a region on the short arm of
chromosome 12 is seen in virtually all cases. In about 80% of men this
is in the form of isochromosome 12p (that is, duplication of the short
arm of chromosome 12), while the remainder have an amplification of a
section of the short arm of chromosome 12 that is translocated onto
other chromosomes. This suggests that genes in this region play a part
in the development of testicular germ cell tumours. The relation
between these changes and testicular germ cell tumours is unclear, but
the absence of these changes in some cases of intratubular germ cell
neoplasia (see below) suggests that amplification of this chromosome
may be related to the progression of the disease rather than
initiation.7
Intratubular germ cell neoplasia
The precursor of testicular germ cell tumours is intratubular germ
cell neoplasia. It is found adjacent to most testicular germ cell
tumours and also in the contralateral testis of 2.5-5% of patients
with germ cell tumours. Contralateral intratubular germ cell neoplasia
is more common in younger patients and in those with atrophic testes;
it is associated with infertility.8 In about 50% of men
with intratubular germ cell neoplasia the neoplasm will progress to
invasive cancer within five years. Low doses of radiotherapy, but not
chemotherapy, reliably destroy intratubular germ cell neoplasia.
Controversy exists over whether biopsy of the contralateral testicle
should be undertaken in all men presenting with testicular cancer or
whether biopsy should be reserved for men at high
risk.
|
| |
Pathology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The histopathology of testicular cancers is complex, and
assessment should be made by a skilled pathologist. The most important discrimination is between seminomas, which account for about 50% of
the total, and teratomas or non-seminomatous germ cell tumours, although mixed tumours can occur and account for about 10% of the
total. Features such as vascular invasion should be
specified.1
| |
Presentation and referral |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Typically the man or his partner finds a painless lump in the testicle. Enlargement of the testicle, firmness, aching, discomfort, or asymmetry within the testis can also occur. Less commonly men with metastases to the para-aortic lymph nodes may present with back pain, and men with pulmonary metastases may present with breathlessness or haemoptysis. Men presenting with a swelling in the scrotum should be examined carefully and an attempt should be made to distinguish between lumps arising from the body of the testis and other intrascrotal swellings. Abnormal masses in the epididymis are common but unlikely to be testicular tumours. Ultrasound scanning helps distinguish between masses in the body of the testis and other intrascrotal swellings and should be done within two weeks of presentation if there is clinical uncertainty. Patients with possible epidymo-orchitis or orchitis that has not resolved within two weeks should be referred for urgent urological assessment and seen by a specialist within two weeks of referral.1
Some evidence suggests that delays in presentation are more of a
problem than delays in making referrals, and public awareness campaigns
may therefore be helpful.9 Although there is no evidence to recommend routine testicular self examination, men should be aware
of the existence of testicular cancer and the early symptoms, particularly if there is a family history of maldescent or testicular cancer.
| |
Diagnosis, treatment, and staging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For most men diagnosis will be made after an urgent inguinal
orchiectomy. All patients should be advised that prostheses are available. In men with obvious metastatic disease, the diagnosis can be
confirmed by the presence of raised serum concentrations of
fetoprotein or human chorionic gonadotrophin. In many men with advanced
metastatic disease concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin
often result in a positive pregnancy test; this can be used as a
readily available and rapid diagnostic test. Knowledge of the
histopathological tumour type, size, and relevant prognostic factors,
such as the presence of vascular invasion (in non-seminomatous germ
cell tumours) or involvement of the rete testis (in seminomas) may help
subsequent management decisions. Concentrations of
fetoprotein are
raised in 50-60% of cases of non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (but
not in pure seminomas), and human chorionic gonadotrophin is raised in
30-35% of non-seminomatous germ cell tumours and 10-25% of seminomas.
Measuring the concentrations of these tumour markers is invaluable in making the diagnosis, determining the prognosis (when used with lactate dehydrogenase), assessing response to treatment, and in following up patients. Concentrations of these markers should be evaluated before an orchiectomy and repeated after surgery until the pattern of a fall in concentrations or normalisation is clear. Urgent staging, including radiography of the chest and computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, should be arranged but should not delay referral to appropriate oncology services.
The first site in the lymphatic system that testicular germ cell tumours metastasise to is the para-aortic lymph nodes; this is because the testis originate in the abdomen. Haematogenous spread is more common in non-seminomatous germ cell tumours and metastases are most likely to occur in the lungs, liver, and brain. The Royal Marsden staging system is widely used internationally and quantifies the size of the tumour and the sites of metastatic disease (box).10 Men with stage I disease have no clinical or radiological evidence of metastases; involvement of the infradiaphragmatic or supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes occurs in stages II and III; and more distant metastases to the lung, liver, brain, or bone, are seen in stage IV.
|
Royal Marsden Hospital staging system for testicular
cancer10
|
The effects on fertility and the possibility of storing sperm should be
discussed with all men before chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Sperm
should be stored in a facility that has been appropriately licensed; in
the United Kingdom this would be at a facility licensed by the Human
Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
| |
Managing stage I disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours
A series of trials in the United Kingdom over the past 20 years has defined two primary strategies for patients with
non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours. The first is a strict
surveillance protocol that reserves chemotherapy for the 30% of men
who develop metastases.11 The second is immediate treatment with two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy
(box).12 Overall survival is nearly 100% with either
approach. Vascular invasion, which is present in about 50% of primary
tumours, is used to stratify men into high risk groups (vascular
invasion has occurred) and low risk groups (vascular invasion has not
occurred). About 50% of men at high risk will have a recurrence if
surveillance is used compared with 15% of men at low risk. About
98-99% of men at high risk will remain free from recurrence after two
courses of adjuvant chemotherapy containing cisplatin.12
Surveillance and salvage treatment are preferred for patients at low
risk. Surveillance involves monthly chest radiography and
monitoring of serum concentrations of
fetoprotein or human
chorionic gonadotrophin in the first year of follow up; the frequency
of the use of computed tomography is currently being examined in a
trial (box).
|
Standard management of testicular cancer in the United
Kingdom
|
Seminomas
About 75% of men with seminomas have stage I
disease.2 Standard treatment is adjuvant radiotherapy to the para-aortic area at a dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions delivered over
three weeks. Only 2-3% of men develop a recurrence,13 and the cure rate after salvage treatment approaches 100%. Phase III trials organised by the UK's Medical Research Council (MRC) and the
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer have shown
that this approach gives similar results to the more extensive
radiotherapy previously used, which included both para-aortic and
ipsilateral pelvic nodal areas. Trials are currently assessing whether
the dose of radiation can be reduced to 20 Gy and the effectiveness of
single agent carboplatin chemotherapy (box).
4 cm) and
involvement of the rete testis as prognostic factors14
together with concerns over the long term toxicity of treatment (see
below) may lead to a re-evaluation of surveillance as a treatment
strategy.
|
Trials organised by the UK's Medical Research Council and the
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer*
TER 2 TE 08 TE 19 TE 20-TIP TE 21 EORTC 30974 *Additional information about the trials can be found at www.ctu.mrc.ac.uk/ukcccr |
| |
Treating metastatic disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An international collaboration organised through the MRC's trials
office collated data on 5202 patients with metastatic non-seminomatous tumours and 660 patients with metastatic seminomas who had been treated
with chemotherapy containing cisplatin.15 Data were analysed using multivariate analysis of risk groups defined by the
tumour markers human chorionic gonadotrophin,
fetoprotein, and
lactate dehydrogenase, and the pattern of disease spread. The results offer a benchmark for practice (box).
Non-seminomatous germ cell tumours
Since the introduction of cisplatin and etoposide the standard
treatment for all patients regardless of risk has been four courses of
chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin.16-18 Other drugs have been shown to be either
more toxic
for example, ifosfamide19
or less active
for
example, carboplatin.20 Despite the risk of pulmonary
toxicity bleomycin remains an essential component of
treatment.21 A recent trial studied chemotherapy in
patients with good prognosis and found that three courses of chemotherapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin were as effective
as four and that the drugs could be given over three days rather than
five.22 For patients with higher risk disease four courses
of this regimen remains the standard, but individual centres have had
apparently better results using more intensive schedules.
23 24
Studies are under way that incorporate
new agents such as paclitaxel, "dose intense" schedules using
weekly treatment, and high dose treatment with stem cell rescue for
patients with features that suggest a poor
prognosis.
|
Prognosis of metastatic germ cell
cancers15
|
Surgery after chemotherapy
About one third of patients with stage II-IV disease, as classed
by the Royal Marsden criteria, have residual para-aortic masses after
treatment. About 10% of these masses have active undifferentiated
malignant elements. The remainder contain differentiated teratoma or
necrotic and fibrotic tissue. Differentiated teratoma is unstable, and
its presence is probably responsible for the late pattern of relapse:
relapses may occur more than five years after treatment. Resection of
all residual masses is recommended and should be undertaken by a
specialist urological surgeon working in conjunction with the oncology
team. Resection of residual pulmonary, mediastinal, and lymph node
masses at other sites may also be required.
Seminomas
Patients with seminomas most commonly present with para-aortic
lymph node metastases, but metastases to the lung, bone, and liver are
also seen. In stage IIA and stage IIB disease radiotherapy alone is
acceptable, and the 20% risk of subsequent relapse may be reduced by
treatment with a single course of carboplatin.25 For
bulkier or more extensive disease combination chemotherapy with the
bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin regimen used for non-seminomatous
germ cell tumours is standard. Single agent chemotherapy using
carboplatin remains a reasonable option if patients have significant
comorbid disease.26
Treating persistent or recurrent disease
Although 85% of men with metastatic disease will be cured with a
combination of chemotherapy and surgery, treating those for whom
treatment has failed poses a major challenge. Approaches that combine
intensive chemotherapy, surgical resection, and, occasionally,
radiotherapy are required; high dose chemotherapy with stem cell
support is usually considered.
27 28
About 30% of men
will be cured by this regimen. Trials are under way to test the use of
high dose chemotherapy and paclitaxel (box). In the United Kingdom,
these patients should be referred to supraregional specialist
centres for management.
| |
Follow up |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of follow up care is to detect a relapse at a stage where salvage treatment has the best chance of being effective, to monitor and treat toxicity related to therapy, to detect contralateral cancers, and to offer support and counselling particularly about issues such as employment and fertility. Suggestions for clinical, biochemical, and radiological follow up have been made,1 but the optimum timing of clinical and radiological follow up is under investigation. Our own institutional review suggests that it may be reasonable to discharge patients with seminomas (all stages) and stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours five years after treatment. Metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours seem to have a continuing annual relapse rate of 1-2% even after 10 years; this suggests that longer term follow up might be indicated. Our preference is to undertake follow up at a cancer centre because of the advantages in maintaining detailed databases and allowing audit of biochemical and radiological tests, but this approach may not be practical or desirable in other locations. As data on long term toxicity develop there may be an increasing role for family practitioners in monitoring these patients.
Treatment toxicity
Chemotherapy with cisplatin causes significant side effects both
in the short term and the long term. Acute side effects include nausea
and vomiting, alopecia, fatigue (either due to anaemia or a direct
effect of treatment), neutropenia, and sepsis. A particular
complication of chemotherapy for testicular cancer is lung toxicity,
which is associated with bleomycin; in most studies 0.5-1% of patients
developed fatal pneumonitis.
21 22
Risk factors for fatal
pneumonitis include being older than 40 years, being a smoker, having a
history of pulmonary disease, and having impaired renal function.
Bleomycin may also be largely responsible for changes in skin
pigmentation and nails as well as the long term risk of developing
Raynaud's syndrome. Cisplatin may cause damage to both the peripheral
and auditory sensory nerves. This resolves in most patients over 6-12 months, but long term studies suggest that persistent damage occurs in
a proportion of patients.29 About 1-2% of patients are at
risk of developing avascular necrosis of the hip 2-3 years after
treatment, and this may be the result of the combination of
chemotherapy and high dose steroids used as antiemetics with these
regimens.30
Social and psychosocial aspects of treatment
Testicular tumours often occur at a time when good health is
taken for granted. In addition to the toxicity of treatment,
considerable psychological distress may arise from the lack of
confidence engendered by the disease with regard to health, fertility,
and body image; there may also be concerns about finances and
employment, and occasionally patients' personalities change as do
their professional relationships. Complete and comprehensible information should be available to allay uncertainties about treatment and prognosis, and good communication must be maintained between the
specialist team and the general practitioner and any other community
services that are involved. Additional routine formal counselling or
psychosocial therapy is not helpful,34 although such
support should be available if specifically indicated.
| |
Future developments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Collaborative and multicentre clinical trials have led to significant improvements in the management of testicular cancer; these improvements have been incorporated into treatment guidelines.1 The optimum treatment for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours in patients with a good prognosis has been defined but the treatment of patients with poor prognosis and recurrent disease still needs improvement. The exploration of new, more intensive treatments is justified for these patients. In men with stage I disease attention is likely to focus on minimising treatment and reducing the long term risks of treatment. Surveillance may become more appropriate, especially if staging accuracy improves, for example, through the use of functional imaging, such as positron emission tomography.35
In the more distant future improved understanding of the biology and the genetics of germ cell tumours may lead to new therapeutic targets and approaches. Great strides have been made in treating germ cell tumours over the past 20 years, but it is likely that further advances will occur in smaller steps that aim to maximise cure and minimise toxicity. Public education and awareness must also be priorities to help patients avoid unnecessary delays in presentation which may have an impact on survival.
|
Additional educational resources
Horwich A, ed. Testicular Cancer Clinical Oncology Information Network (COIN). Guidelines on the management of adult testicular germ cell tumours. Available at www.rcr.ac.uk/testicular.htm Sandberg AA, et al. Reviews of chromosome studies in urological tumours. III. Cytogenetics and genes in testicular tumours. J Urol 1996;155:1531-56. |
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: This paper was jointly written by DPD, RAH, and AH.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: DPD is funded by the Bob Champion Cancer Trust. The Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology at the Institute of Cancer Research is supported by a programme grant from the Cancer Research Campaign.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Clinical Oncology Information Network (COIN). Guidelines on the management of adult testicular cancer. Clin Oncol 2000; 12(Suppl): S173-S210[CrossRef]. |
| 2. |
Cancer Research Campaign.
Testicular cancer UK: factsheet 16.
London: Cancer Research Campaign, 1998.
|
| 3. | Sharpe RM, Skakkebaek NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract? Lancet 1993; 341: 1392-1395[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Rapley E, Crockford G, Teare D, Briggs P, Seal S, Barfoot R, et al. Localization to Xq27 of a susceptibility gene for testicular germ-cell tumours. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 197-200[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Forman D, Pike M, Davey G, Dawson S, Baker K, Chilvers C, et al.
The aetiology of testicular cancer: association with congenital abnormalities, age at puberty, infertility and excercise.
BMJ
1994;
308:
1393-1399 |
| 6. |
Akre O, Ekbom A, Hsieh C-C, Trichopoulos D, Adami H-O.
Testicular nonseminoma and seminoma in relation to perinatal characteristics.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1996;
88:
883-889 |
| 7. | Summersgill B, Osin P, Lu Y-J, Huddart R, Shipley J. Chromosomal imbalances associated with carcinoma in situ and associated testicular germ cell tumours of adolescents and adults. Br J Cancer (in press). |
| 8. | Harland SJ, Cook PA, Fossa SD, Horwich A, Mead GM, Parkinson MC, et al. Intratubular germ cell neoplasia of the contralateral testis in testicular cancer. Defining a high risk group. J Urol 1998; 160: 1353-1357[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Thornhill J, Conroy R, Kelly D, Walsh A, Fennelly J, Fitzpatrick J. Public awareness of testicular cancer and the value of self examination. BMJ 1986; 293: 480-481. |
| 10. |
Horwich A.
Testicular cancer.
In:
Horwich A, ed.
Oncology a multidisciplinary textbook.
London: Chapman and Hall, 1995:485-498.
|
| 11. |
Read G, Stenning SP, Cullen MH, Parkinson MC, Horwich A, Kaye SB, et al.
Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma.
J Clin Oncol
1992;
10:
1762-1768 |
| 12. |
Cullen MH.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis.
In:
Horwich A, ed.
Testicular cancer investigation and management.
2nd ed.
London: Chapman and Hall, 1996:181-191.
|
| 13. |
Zagars GK.
Management of stage I seminoma: radiotherapy.
In:
Horwich A, ed.
Testicular cancer investigation and management.
2nd ed.
London: Chapman and Hall, 1996:99-122.
|
| 14. | Warde P, von der Maase H, Horwich A, Gospodarowicz M, Panzarella T, Specht L. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance. In: Program/Proceedings: American Society of Clinical Oncology. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1998:1188. |
| 15. |
International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group.
International germ cell consensus classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers.
J Clin Oncol
1997;
15:
594-603 |
| 16. | Einhorn LH, Donohue J. Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, vinblastine, and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in disseminated testicular cancer. Ann Intern Med 1977; 87: 293-298. |
| 17. | Peckham MJ, Barrett A, Liew K, Horwich A, Robinson B, Dobbs HJ, et al. The treatment of metastatic germ-cell testicular tumours with bleomycin, etoposide and cis-platin (BEP). Br J Cancer 1983; 47: 613-619[Medline]. |
| 18. | Williams SD, Birch R, Einhorn LH, Irwin L, Greco FA, Loehrer PJ. Treatment of disseminated germ-cell tumors with cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1435-1440[Abstract]. |
| 19. | Kaye SB, Mead GM, Fossa S, Cullen M, deWit R, Bodrogi I, et al. Intensive induction-sequential chemotherapy with BOP/VIP-B compared with treatment with BEP/EP for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: a randomized Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 692-701[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Horwich A, Sleijfer DT, Fossa SD, Kaye SB, Oliver RT, Cullen MH, et al.
Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial.
J Clin Oncol
1997;
15:
1844-1852 |
| 21. |
De Wit R, Stoter G, Kaye SB, Sleijfer DT, Jones WG, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al.
Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular non-seminoma: a randomised study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.
J Clin Oncol
1997;
15:
1837-1843 |
| 22. | De Wit R, Roberts JT, Wilkinson PM, de Mulder PH, Mead GM, Fossa SD, et al. Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group and the Medical Research Council. J Clin Urol 2001; 19: 1629-1640. |
| 23. |
Bower M, Newlands E, Holden L, Rustin G, Begent R.
Treatment of men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours with cyclical POMB/ACE chemotherapy.
Ann Oncol
1997;
8:
477-483 |
| 24. |
Dearnaley DP.
Intensive induction treatment for poor risk patients.
In:
Horwich A, ed.
Testicular cancer clinical investigation and management.
London: Chapman and Hall, 1991:233-248.
|
| 25. | Patterson H, Norman A, Nicholls J, Fisher C, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, et al. Combination carboplatin and radiotherapy in the management of stage IIA and stage IIB testicular seminoma: comparison with radiotherapy treatment alone. Radiother Oncol 2001; 59: 5-11[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Horwich A, Oliver R, Wilkinson P, Mead G, Harland S, Cullen M, et al. A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 1623-1629[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. |
Beyer J, Kramar A, Mandanas R, Linkesch W, Greinix A, Droz JP, et al.
High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ cell tumors: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables.
J Clin Oncol
1996;
14:
2638-2645 |
| 28. | Horwich A. Salvage therapy of germ cell tumours. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 901-903[Medline]. |
| 29. | Huddart R, Norman A, Coward D, Nicholls E, Jay G, Shahidi M, et al. The health of long term survivors of testicular cancer. In: Program/Proceedings: American Society of Clinical Oncology. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2000:331. |
| 30. | Cook A, Patterson H, Nicholls J, Huddart R. Avascular necrosis in patients treated with BEP chemotherapy for testicular tumours. Clin Oncol 1999; 11: 126-127. |
| 31. |
Lampe H, Horwich A, Norman A, Nicholls J, Dearnaley DP.
Fertility after chemotherapy for testicular germ cell cancers.
J Clin Oncol
1997;
15:
239-245 |
| 32. |
Travis L, Curtis R, Storm H, Hall P, Holowaty E, Van Leeuwen F, et al.
Risk of second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of testicular cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1997;
89:
1429-1439 |
| 33. |
Meinardi M, Gietema J, van der Graaf W, van Veldhuisen D, Runne M, Sluiter W, et al.
Cardiovascular morbidity in long-term survivors of metastatic testicular cancer.
J Clin Oncol
2000;
18:
1725-1732 |
| 34. |
Moynihan C, Bliss JM, Davidson J, Burchell L, Horwich A.
Evaluation of adjuvant psychological therapy in patients with testicular cancer: randomised controlled trial.
BMJ
1998;
316:
429-435 |
| 35. | Hain S, O'Doherty M, Timothy A, Leslie M, Harper P, Huddart R. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 863-869[CrossRef][Medline]. |
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+