Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Adrian White a See
Editorial by Vincent and
p 486 Department of
Complementary Medicine, School of Postgraduate Medicine and Health
Sciences, University of Exeter EX2 4NT, b Pain Clinic, Colchester District General Hospital, Colchester
CO4 5JL, c Faculty of Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
PR1 2HE Correspondence to: A White a.r.white{at}ex.ac.uk
Acupuncture is increasingly popular, but it is not free
from risk for the patient.1 Safety is best established
with prospective surveys. Our aim was to ascertain the incidence of
adverse events related to acupuncture treatment, as currently practised
in Britain by doctors and physiotherapists.
Volunteer acupuncture practitioners were recruited through
journals circulated to members of the British Medical Acupuncture Society and the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists (approximately 2750 members).2 A prospective survey was
undertaken using forms for intensive event monitoring that had been
piloted previously.3 Minor adverse events were defined as
"any ill-effect, no matter how small, that is unintended and
non-therapeutic, even if not unexpected." These events were reported
every month, along with the total number of consultations. Minor or
serious events that were considered to be
"significant" Estimates of incidences per 10 000 population were calculated
with the acupuncturist (not the consultation) as the primary sampling
unit. Since the data were skewed, with extreme values present,
confidence intervals corrected for bias were calculated using
bootstrapping procedure "bs" on estimates from the function "svyratio" in intercooled Stata version 6.0 with 10 000 replications.
Data were collected from June 1998 to February 2000 from 78 acupuncturists, 13 of whom chose to remain anonymous. The average age
of the acupuncturists was 47 (range 27-71) years, 61% were doctors and
39% physiotherapists, and 71% had practised for five years or more.
In all, 31 822 (median 318, range 5-1911) consultations were included.
Altogether, 43 "significant" events were reported (table), giving a
rate of 14 per 10 000 (95% confidence interval 8/10 000 to
20/10 000). In addition, 48 apparently similar events were reported on
the monthly forms, presumably due to different interpretations of
"significant". All adverse events had cleared within one week, except for one incident of pain that lasted two weeks and one of
sensory symptoms that lasted several weeks. According to accepted criteria,3 none (0/10 000 to 1.2/10 000) of these events
was serious.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
"unusual, novel, dangerous, significantly
inconvenient, or requiring further information"
were reported on
separate forms when they occurred. Anonymous reporting was accepted. A
sample size of 30 000 consultations was necessary to identify with
95% confidence any adverse event with a frequency of 1 in 10 000
consultations.4
A total of 2135 minor events was reported, giving an incidence of
671 per 10 000 (42/10 000 to 1013/10 000) consultations. The most
common events were bleeding (310 (160 to 590) per 10 000
consultations) and needling pain (110 (49-247) per 10 000 consultations). Aggravation of symptoms occurred in 96 (43-178) per
10 000 consultations; in 70% of these cases, there was a subsequent improvement in the presenting complaint. The highest rates
reported by individual acupuncturists, expressed as a percentage of
consultations, were 53% for bleeding, 24% for pain, and 11% for
aggravation of symptoms.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Doctors and physiotherapists who performed acupuncture reported no serious adverse events and 671 minor adverse events per 10 000 acupuncture consultations. These rates are classified as minimal5; however, 14 per 10 000 of these minor events were reported as significant. These event rates are per consultation, and they do not give the risk per individual patient.
Demographic data suggest that the acupuncturist volunteers were
reasonably representative of the members of the two societies, but
over-reporting and under-reporting are inherently possible in such
studies. High individual rates may be due to a low personal threshold
for reporting, or they may indicate the need for further training of
the acupuncturist. Some avoidable adverse events occurred, and
acupuncturists might consider modifying their practice to reduce the
incidence of such events.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank members of the British Medical Acupuncture Society and the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists for collecting data, Mike Fitter and Hugh MacPherson for advice in designing the questionnaire, and Val Hopwood for help in recruiting volunteers.
Contributors: EE, SH, and AW planned the study, which was supervised by AW. The data were collected by members of the British Medical Acupuncture Society and the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists. The results were collated by AW, and AH performed the statistical analysis. The final report was written by AW, SH, AH, and EE. AW and EE will act as guarantors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: The posts of AW and EE are funded by the Maurice Laing Foundation.
Competing interests: AW has received fees for lecturing at scientific and educational meetings arranged by the British Medical Acupuncture Society and the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists. SH has received fees for lecturing and for acting as editor of the professional journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society, Acupuncture in Medicine.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ernst E, White A. Life-threatening adverse reactions after acupuncture? A systematic review. Pain 1997; 71: 123-126[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | White AR, Hayhoe S, Ernst E. Survey of adverse events following acupuncture. Acupunct Med 1997; 15: 67-70. |
| 3. | Edwards RI, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000; 356: 1255-1259[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Eypasch E, Lefering R, Kum CK, Troidl H.
Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder.
BMJ
1995;
311:
619-620 |
| 5. | British Medical Association Ethics. Medical ethics today. Its practice and philosophy. London: BMA Professional Division Publications, 1993. |
(Accepted 17 May 2001)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+