Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Tony Sheldon Three Dutch GPs are calling on doctors not to prescribe Novartis
products in protest at the Swiss based pharmaceutical company's "information campaign" urging people with onychomycosis, or
ringworm of the nails, to visit their GP.
In a row reflecting concerns across Europe, Dutch doctors and the
government's advertising code commission had criticised the Novartis
campaign, claiming that it promotes the company's prescription only
product terbinafine (Lamisil). The Dutch Society of General
Practitioners shares the concern that such information campaigns are an
unnecessary burden, threatening the efficiency of prescribing and
focusing attention on unimportant health problems. Spending on
terbinafine for 2001 is estimated at However, in May a Dutch court ruled that the Novartis campaign did not
contravene laws banning direct to consumer advertising of prescription
drugs, as neither Novartis nor terbinafine is specifically named.
Terbinafine is, however, the only effective treatment for
onychomycosis, according to prescribing standards set by the Dutch
Society of General Practitioners.
The campaign, which included TV advertisements and road shows, has been
relaunched despite "negative reactions" from doctors. GPs from
Best, in the south of the Netherlands, are now calling for the Novartis
boycott in a letter to the journal of the Royal Dutch Medical
Association, Medisch Contact.
The doctors write that ringworm of the nails rarely requires treatment,
but that Novartis, "with dollar signs in their eyes, persist in this
undesirable and improper form of advertising." They call on all
prescribing doctors to refuse to see pharmaceutical representatives and
not to prescribe Novartis products unless there is no "medically
acceptable alternative."
One of the GPs, Remon Hendriksen, said, "We are angry. This
advertising is an undesirable development. In five years we will have
10 more adverts offering cures for such diseases. If a patient has a
physical complaint he should discuss it with a doctor. This advertising
interferes with that." He explained that if there were good medical
indications for using terbinafine, such as pain or diabetes, the
doctors would prescribe it; the boycott applies where there are
medically satisfactory alternatives.
Novartis's dermatology product manager, Ms Patricia Klijn-van Rossum,
said that a boycott, which tramples on the interests of patients, is
unworthy of the medical profession. She argues that doctors do not
choose their products without good reason. One in seven Dutch people
suffer from ringworm of the nails, and in one in three cases this leads
to serious pain.
The consumer health lobby group Health Action International, based in
Amsterdam, said that the blurring of the line between advertising and
information is of increasing concern across the EU. The group's
co-director Margaret Ewen said that it supports good quality, objective
information on drugs but that the Novartis campaign was part of a
"marketing strategy designed to increase sales."
31.5m (£20.1m; $30.5m), triple
the figure for 1997.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+