Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Amy J Luck a Department of Psychiatry, St George's
Hospital Medical School, University of London, London SW17 0RE, b Department of Public Health Sciences,
St George's Hospital Medical School, c Faculty of Health
and Social Care Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical
School Correspondence to: J F Morgan
Standards 2 and 3 of the national service framework
for mental health outline the need to improve health care for patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.1 Healthcare
workers in primary care are at the forefront of screening and managing these disorders. Assessment tools available to primary healthcare professionals can take a long time to administer and may need to be
interpreted by specialists2; this may limit improvements in care. A screening tool was developed, but only to facilitate epidemiological research.3
The SCOFF questionnaire is a brief and memorable tool designed to
detect eating disorders and aid treatment (see figure). It showed
excellent validity in a clinical population and reliability in a
student population.
4 5
We assessed the SCOFF
questionnaire in primary care.
We invited sequential women attenders (aged 18-50) at two general
practices in southwest London to participate. We gave participants information sheets that described the study. Women who verbally consented to participate were asked the SCOFF questions in a separate room; this took about two minutes. A researcher blind to the woman's score on the SCOFF questionnaire conducted a clinical diagnostic interview lasting 10-15 minutes, based on criteria from the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(fourth edition). Women identified by the interview as having an eating
disorder were invited to discuss this and were offered the contact
number for the Eating Disorders Association. The local research and
ethics committee approved the study.
Of the 341 women who agreed to take participate, one (who had a body
mass index of 17 (weight (kg)/height (m)2)) had
anorexia nervosa, three had bulimia nervosa, and nine had an "eating
disorder not otherwise specified." A receiver operating curve set the
optimal threshold for the questionnaire at two or more positive answers
to the five questions. With this cut off, the SCOFF questionnaire
detected all four cases of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and
seven of nine cases of eating disorders not otherwise specified
(figure). The questionnaire had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95%
confidence interval 54.6% to 98.1%). In the 328 women confirmed not
to have an eating disorder, the questionnaire indicated 34 false
positives. It had a specificity of 89.6% (86.3% to 92.9%),
positive predictive value of 24.4% (12.9% to 39.5%), and
negative predictive value of 99.3% (97.6% to
99.9%).
The SCOFF questionnaire detected all cases of anorexia and bulimia
nervosa. It is an efficient screening tool for eating disorders.
Two missed cases of eating disorders not otherwise specified reflect
the reality of clinical situations, in which denial or non-disclosure
by patients may occur. One of the patients in whom the diagnosis was
missed later disclosed disordered eating behaviour. It may be more
difficult and perhaps less pertinent to detect patients who do not meet
full criteria for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa.
The positive predictive value of the questionnaire is low because of
the low prevalence of eating disorders in this sample, which was
consistent with the Western population as a whole. Overinclusion is
acceptable for screening instruments designed for disorders with high
mortality rates, particularly as the questionnaire is short and easy to
administer. Positive results should be followed by further questioning
rather than by automatic referral.
The SCOFF questionnaire is efficient at detecting cases of eating
disorders in adult women in primary care. We recommend its use by
healthcare professionals in primary care. Future work will assess the
validity of the questionnaire in other populations, such as
adolescents, in whom the prevalence may be higher.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comments
References

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Receiver operating curve showing the effect of cut-off points (1 to 5)
for the SCOFF questionnaire to detect cases and non-cases of eating
disorders. 1 to 5=minimum number of positive responses to
questionnaire
![]()
Comments
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comments
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Study to be attributed to the Department of Psychiatry at St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London, London. We thank K Kennett for her help with data collection. We also thank Wandle Valley Surgery and Brocklebank Group Practice, particularly T Coffey, who provided study patients. We thank the volunteers for their kind participation.
Contributors: All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. AL, AO'B, JB, and CP were responsible for the collection and management of data. AL, FR, and JM analysed and interpreted data. AL wrote the paper and all other authors oversaw the writing and edited the paper. JM and HL will act as guarantors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Department of Health. A national service framework for mental health: modern standards and service models. London: Stationery Office, 1999. |
| 2. | Garner DM, Olmstead MA, Polivy J. Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Int J Eat Disord 1983; 2: 15-34. |
| 3. | Beglin SJ, Fairburn CG. Evaluation of a new instrument for the detection of eating disorders in community samples. Psychiatry Res 1992; 44: 191-201[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Morgan JF, Reid F, Lacey JH.
The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders.
BMJ
1999;
319:
1467-1468 |
| 5. | Perry L, Morgan J, Reid F, O'Brien A, Brunton J, Luck A, et al. Oral versus written administration of the SCOFF. Int J Eating Disorders (in press). |
(Accepted 28 February 2002)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+