Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Tony Sheldon For the first time in the Netherlands, a court has awarded damages
to a severely disabled girl for the fact that she was born The case of 9 year old Kelly Molenaar has led MPs to call for the
Netherlands to follow France and ban damage claims for wrongful life.
Doctors fear the judgment could lead to a sharp increase in defensive
prenatal testing.
A court in The Hague heard how Kelly's parents had informed a midwife
at the Leiden University Medical Centre that a relative of the father
was disabled because of a chromosomal abnormality. But the midwife
reassured them and did not carry out further prenatal diagnostic tests
or refer the case to a clinical geneticist.
The abnormality was therefore not detected early enough and Kelly was
born with multiple mental and physical disabilities. She cannot walk,
talk, or properly recognise her parents; has deformed feet; is believed
to be in constant pain; and has had several heart operations. By the
age of 21/2 she had been admitted to hospital nine times due to
"inconsolable crying."
The court accepted that damage to Kelly and her parents resulted from
the midwife's error. A referral to a clinical geneticist would have
resulted in an abortion and Kelly would not have been born. Damages
against the hospital amounting to the cost of Kelly's care and
upbringing until her 21st birthday were awarded to her parents.
But the court went further, ruling that Kelly herself was liable to
damages. The court judged that the damage experienced by Kelly was in a
legal sense a predictable consequence of the midwife's mistake.
Therefore the court accepted the possibility of a claim for wrongful
life. A further court sitting must now set the level of damages. The
hospital's lawyers are considering an appeal to the Supreme Court to
quash the judgment.
MPs are urging the ministries of health and justice to respond to the
decision. Democrat 66 MP Boris Dittrich has called for Dutch law to be
changed to prohibit wrongful life claims. This happened in France in
2002 after a similar case Joseph Hubben, professor of health law at the Free University of
Amsterdam, said: "To recognise a disabled life as a source of
financial damages gives the wrong signal to society. Disabled people
should be fellow citizens not someone who should have been aborted."
He also argued that the decision would increase pressure for more
prenatal diagnostic testing not just from parents but also from doctors.
a so called
"wrongful life" judgment.
known as the Perruche case
in which a
disabled child was given damages for having been born
(BMJ 2001;323:1384)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+