Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Abiodun Raufu The families of 52 children who were part of a Pfizer drug trial
seven years ago in Kano, northern Nigeria, have taken the multinational
drug company to a district court in the US state of Connecticut to
demand compensation for damage allegedly sustained during the drug trials.
Pfizer tested its drug trovafloxacin (Trovan) in some children at the
Infectious Disease Hospital in Kano in 1996 during an epidemic of
meningitis. Many of the children died, while several others developed
permanent mental and physical deformities (BMJ 2001;322:194, BMJ 2001;323:592).
A counsel for the children, Lukman Ishola, says that Pfizer conducted
the trial test of trovafloxacin on paediatric patients in a secretive
manner without consent of their parents and guardians. He also claimed
that the children's families were not told that they were taking part
in a drug test.
The lawyers are demanding $5m (£3.2m; a4.6m) compensation from
Pfizer for each of the children, in addition to $25m as punitive damages.
"My friends persuaded me to understand that if we fail to let the
world know the injustice done to our children in Nigeria by this
company, they will go on to other countries to do the same," said Ali
Darma, father of 12 year old Naja'atu Ali Darma, who was one of the
children tested and who is now deaf and without speech.
"That is why I agreed to join the suit. It is not the compensation
that really matters but to see that our children's agony and pains do
not go in vain. Those who are responsible for this must pay the price."
Pfizer's counsel, Abdullahi Ibrahim, however, denied the claims:
"These allegations are unsupported and simply false."
The children's families said they had to resort to an American court
after losing confidence in the ponderous Nigerian judicial system,
which has stalled their case since March 2001, when it was first filed
in court.
Mr Darma said that they decided to withdraw the case from Nigeria and
take it to the US court when it became clear that they were not likely
to get justice in Nigeria after their case was adjourned more than 14 times.
"It is unfortunate that a citizen of Nigeria cannot get justice in
his own country," said Mr Darma. "All our efforts at getting justice have failed as a result of unending adjournments."
Mr Ibrahim, however, absolved Pfizer of any blame: "The delay in this
case was due to actions and inactions by the plaintiffs' counsel."
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+