Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
It's a wiki wiki world
EDITOR The future belongs to Lisa. Smart and articulate, she will thrive in a
milieu that she manipulates so that useful information will flow
towards her. By participating in her online communities and achieving
status in these groups, she will be the one who knows (or at least who
knows who knows) the required information.
Lisa will have accepted the basic precepts of the cluetrain manifesto
(www.cluetrain.com), its essence being that communication in the
modern world is based on continuous online conversations by email
between service providers and clients, their immediacy and formality
being somewhere between a letter and a telephone call. Lisa will
participate continuously in her global conversations, irrespective of
her physical location. The lines between her work and leisure will blur.
Abbasi et al seem unsure as to how many journals there will be in
Lisa world. They list the range as 0 to 1 million. Conversation is
great, but we still need to separate the wheat from the chaff and the
signal from the noise. Fortunately the internet has given us the
answer
Abbasi et al are to be congratulated on their crystal ball
gazing.1 Communication in the modern world is clearly changing, and even in the world of medical publishing the old ways are
giving way to the new. Although Homer may make some minor changes, his
children will never follow in his footsteps.
one
the Wikipedia concept, which has developed as a result of
the open source software model using free (wiki) software (www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicine). The essential features are a
revision control system, unrestricted editing of articles on the wiki
by any registered member, unrestricted membership of the wiki, and
the ability to fork articles (or see current versions at the same
time). In addition, no copies are deleted and the newer versions of an
article comprise the original article with all additions made cumulatively.
Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia ddguest{at}zeeclor.mine.nu
Competing interests: DG is a deputy editor of the online medical journal, Medicine Australia (www.medicineau.net.au/), which is run by the Northern Rivers Division of General Practitioners but has no other association with online or print media journals.
| 1. |
Abbasi K, Butterfield M, Connor J, Delamothe T, Dutton S, Hadridge P, et al.
Four futures for scientific and medical publishing.
BMJ
2002;
325:
1472-1475 |
There needs to be a fifth world
EDITOR Furthermore, online information is increasingly free to users in places
such as west Africa, but access is still very expensive for most
potential users because the personal computer, the phone line, and the
power and subscription to internet providers are still scarce and
costly. Paper is still cheaper, unlike in some other parts of the world
(this might be changing but only slowly).
The Lisa world of publishing will exacerbate plagiarism unless
website providers will guarantee to archive publications for long
periods of time so that references can be checked for authenticity long
after they are used in bibliographies. Perhaps there should be a fifth
world, where publishers give authors greater rewards for their work so
as to retain their confidence. This fifth world will ultimately benefit
everyone, the scientist, the medical professional, and the patient,
wherever they may be located on the globe.
Competing interests: JA is managing editor of BMJ
West Africa edition and chief executive of BMJWA's
Health Information Resource Centre, Calabar, Nigeria, which stands to
be affected in some way by future developments in medical publishing.
For scientists and medical professionals the Lisa world scenario
poses the biggest challenge, at least for the near future.1 Today, the internet is crowded with spurious, if
not false, information. Until some way is found to help users in
identifying what is chaff and what is substance, it will be dangerous
for authors to bypass publishers who spend a lot of time, energy, and
money in peer reviewing submitted articles and posting their papers on
the internet. The peer review system may not be faultless, but at least
it serves the scientific and medical community well in deterring some
quack would-be authors.
BMJ West Africa, UK Office, Luton LU2
7AE bmjwa.bmjwa{at}virgin.net
1.
Abbasi K, Butterfield M, Connor J, Delamothe T, Dutton S, Hadridge P, et al.
Four futures for scientific and medical publishing.
BMJ
2002;
325:
1472-1475
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd