BMJ  2003;327:241-242 (2 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7409.241

Editorial

Paying for bmj.com

From 2005, some users will have to pay for some content

Almost 10 years after it began, the BMJ 's experiment of allowing free access to everything on its website will come to an end. The BMJ Publishing Group board has decided that, from January 2005, visitors to bmj.com should pay for access. The resulting revenue should not only defray the website's current costs but also allow us to fund further developments.

Exactly which content will be behind access controls, for how long, and for whom has yet to be decided. We can, however, assure BMA members (including student members) and users from the World Bank's list of 120 low and lower middle income countries¹ that access will remain free to them. We had hoped to extend this dispensation to medical students everywhere, but the difficulty of verifying the credentials of an estimated 14 000 medical student visitors each week makes this unlikely. Access to student bmj.com will remain free.

The model we are currently finalising for bmj.com is likely to make all content free for a week or two after publication. Most of it will then be behind access controls for a year or more. Content that we intend keeping free throughout this period includes abstracts of articles, rapid responses, and the Editor's Choice column. All of BMJ Careers (Career Focus, recruitment and of course advertisements, and career services) will remain free.

Our intention is to continue making the full text versions of our original research articles freely available on bmj.com and PubMed Central from the day of publication. The abridged versions of these articles ("paper short") are likely to be behind access controls.

The board's decision to introduce access controls was precipitated by anxiety over falling library subscriptions to the paper journal. In common with many scientific journals, numbers of subscribers have been falling steadily over the past decade, but the BMJ 's rate of decline has increased recently. Our current total is 9% lower than the same time last year, whereas the publishing group's 26 specialist journals, 25 of which have access controls, have experienced falls of only 4%. Access controls have given these journals the possibility of selling electronic subscriptions—an opportunity lost to bmj.com because of its free status.

The fall in BMJ subscription revenue is likely to accelerate as increasing numbers of libraries abandon paper subscriptions in favour of electronic ones. A recent survey of large American academic libraries suggests that between 50% and 80% of journal subscriptions will be solely electronic within five years (Morna Conway, personal communication). So long as access to the electronic BMJ remains free, we will have nothing to replace the revenue lost from cancelled paper subscriptions.

Although figure 1 shows that subscriptions account for only 12% of the BMJ 's total revenue, our problem is that our two other main sources of revenue are also under threat. Job advertisements, which account for 61% of our revenue, are threatened by an NHS job website for England (sites for jobs in Scotland and Wales already exist). And spending by UK pharmaceutical companies is down 8% over last year, with fewer new drugs to promote.²

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1 BMJ's revenue, 2002

 

Although it's unclear whether the subscription model for scientific journals will survive in the long term, it still has a few years of life left in it.³ Like any business, the BMJ is obliged to preserve as many different revenue streams as possible. For example, had we been solely reliant on the pharmaceutical industry for financial support—like many publications—our recent theme issue on the need to disentangle doctors from the drug industry⁴ might never have happened.

Nevertheless, the end of free access is likely to affect the sudden explosion in exposure to the BMJ. The number of computers accessing bmj.com recently reached 132 000 per week, equivalent to about 185 000 individual users per week, or nearly twice the number of people who receive the paper journal (fig 2). Nearly two thirds of these users live outside the United Kingdom, with half rarely or never seeing a copy of the paper BMJ—a legacy of our previous policy, strongly endorsed by BMA members,⁵ to make the full electronic journal freely available to doctors everywhere.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 2 Weekly circulation of BMJ, 1840-2003

 

While the journal's international influence has undoubtedly increased, it's much harder to quantify this than to quantify how much bmj.com costs (about £4.60 per BMA member last year.) One proxy for influence, at least within the academic community, is the impact factor. The BMJ 's impact factor has risen much faster recently than the average for the group's specialist journals, which have remained behind access controls (fig 3).

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 3 Impact factors, 1990-2002

 

We expect to charge individuals between £10 and £20 ($16 to $33; €14 to €28) a year for an online subscription; charges to libraries will vary according to the number of people they serve. For users accessing the website via a library that subscribes, access will feel free. Non-BMA members whose libraries do not yet subscribe to the BMJ have nearly 18 months to persuade them to do so, or to save up for a personal subscription.

bmj.com

BMJ

---

Competing interests: TD and RS both work for the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Although the group's profits are likely to rise with the introduction of access controls to bmj.com, their salaries will not be affected.

References

1. Countries with free access. www.bmjjournals.com/subscriptions/countries.shtml (accessed 26 Jul 2003).
2. Taylor D. Fewer new drugs from the pharmaceutical industry. BMJ 2003;326: 408-9.[Free Full Text]
3. Abbasi K, Butterfield M, Connor J, Delamothe T, Dutton S, Hadridge P, et al. Four futures for scientific and medical publishing. BMJ 2002;325: 1472-5.[Free Full Text]
4. Time to untangle doctors from drug industry (theme issue). BMJ 2003;326: 1155-222.[Free Full Text]
5. Results of annual bmj.com questionnaire (Nov 2002). bmj.com/aboutsite/quest2002/#BMA (accessed 26 July 2003).

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Paying for bmj.com: BMJ is the property of the world

Rafael Gonzalez
BMJ 2003 327: 1346. [Extract] [Full Text]

Paying for bmj.com: Move is understandable but sad end to a decade

Susanne Stevens
BMJ 2003 327: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text]

Paying for bmj.com: Nothing is for free

Anna Belozerova
BMJ 2003 327: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text]

Paying for bmj.com: Move is a sensible surprise

Christine Porter
BMJ 2003 327: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text]

Paying for bmj.com: Researchers will submit their articles elsewhere

Gunther Eysenbach
BMJ 2003 327: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text]

Paying for bmj.com: Is this measure scientific literature's half open sesame?

Clarence C Tam, Ben A Lopman, and Dina Handan
BMJ 2003 327: 1347. [Extract] [Full Text]

The positive in negatives

Kamran Abbasi
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Gonzalez, R. (2003). Paying for bmj.com: BMJ is the property of the world. BMJ 327: 1346-1346 [Full text]  
• Belozerova, A. (2003). Paying for bmj.com: Nothing is for free. BMJ 327: 1347-1347 [Full text]  
• (2003). Hit Parade. BMJ 327: 816-816 [Full text]  
• (2003). BMJ.com: toll-free no more. CMAJ 169: 645-645 [Full text]  
• (2003). BMJ.com : l'acces gratuit disparaIt. CMAJ 169: 647-647 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

BMJ Internet Access

Colin A. Mackenzie
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Free-actual versus free-virtual - August 1, 2003

Phillip J. Colquitt
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Paying for bmj.com

John P Allen
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Who should have free access to the BMJ

Judith Ronat
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Bad news

Giuseppe Giocoli
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

BMJ.com Access : £12 Per Year

Joseph .C. Obi
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

free access to bmj.com

julian.g turner
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

I will pay

Christian Weymayr
bmj.com, 1 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Researchers will submit their articles elsewhere

Gunther Eysenbach
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Paying for access

Joseph More
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

To pay for B.M.J on line?

kurri Pakira Reddy
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

It is very important to keep the independence

José J. Santonja-Lucas, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: Who should have free access to the BMJ

Philip Smith
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

BMJ IS PROPERTY OF THE WORLD

RAFAEL GONZALEZ
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Access to bmj.com for specialists

Eckehard Stuth, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A reasonable solution

Aubrey Zabow
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Thank-you For The Access

Jim Harwood
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Where are we heading?

Disa Hoehne
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Paying for BMJ.com

P.C. Ghosh
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A sensible surprise

Christine Porter
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Joining the others

Linda MAnn
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

BMJ .com should be free to read for tropical countries

himmatrao saluba Bawaskar
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

should include free medline access.

dr.manan vasenwala
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

What happened to the 'author pays' model?

Adam Jacobs
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Close the site for doctors, keep open for the public ?

Lára Halla Maack, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Aug 2003 [Full text]

bmj.com has got to be worth much more than £20 per year…

Alan Walker
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Sad News For Knowledge Exchange

Rafael M Galliez, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2003 [Full text]

The BMJ will experiment with the "author pays" model

Richard Smith
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Different models of "author pays"

Richard Smith
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Other kinds of "input fees"

James E. Till
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: Sad News For Knowledge Exchange

Wladimir K de Paula
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A marketing problem

Debra Pannowtiz
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Exemptions

Halina M. Iwanowska, et al.
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

6 month block is enough

Fiona McLean
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Relieved of Guilt

Patrick M. Kelly
bmj.com, 4 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Its OK

Martha L. Rogers, PhD
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Patients learn also

John Madura
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Sad end to a decade

susanne steens, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Paying for bmj.com

Graham P Beck
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A Great Pity

Antony F Sara
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Please keep it free for developing countries

Jai B Sharma
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

I understand that it is reasonable - nothing is for free

Anna Belozerova
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

It is absolutely reasonable to charge bmj.com

Catalin Popescu
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Libraries and bmj.com

Stephen C Due
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2003 [Full text]

thank you for a decade of generosity

Rahimah Jafry
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: A marketing problem

Ramesh Patel
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Think before you pay

Murat Acar
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A real shame

Jessica C Lewin
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Evolutionary Change in Medical Publishing

John H. Lange
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: 6 month block is enough

Robert Munro
bmj.com, 8 Aug 2003 [Full text]

A case of a disappearing article – a sign of the Times? – August 9, 2003

Phillip J. Colquitt
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2003 [Full text]

BMJ on Line

Timothy M Southwood
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2003 [Full text]

fiscal need

william s. craig
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Another bubble deepens, later than many

Adrian K Midgley
bmj.com, 10 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Thanks, but sad

Francisco E. Fernandez
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2003 [Full text]

please keep it easy

Thomas L. Perry
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Thanks BMJ

Patricia W. Njuguna
bmj.com, 11 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: 6 month block is enough

Chris J.R. Willmott
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Re: A case of a disappearing article – a sign of the Times? – August 9, 2003

Robert Munro
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Unfortunate

sree kumar
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Why a Free Medical JOURNAL?

Walid Elias Kai
bmj.com, 12 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Confusion over "free"

Michael J Brown
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2003 [Full text]

From a Non-Professional's Point of View

Mark Hans
bmj.com, 13 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Sign of the times but said with thanks

Morag Martindale
bmj.com, 15 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Independance first

DIANOUX Jean-Louis
bmj.com, 16 Aug 2003 [Full text]

Scientific literature’s half-open sesame?

Clarence C. Tam, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Aug 2003 [Full text]

It costs much more than ten pounds

Marco Antivalle
bmj.com, 4 Sep 2003 [Full text]

Free BMJ access helps to make medicine more democratic and accountable

N Portman
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2003 [Full text]

The wrong emphasis

Ian Miskin
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2003 [Full text]

Go the whole hog

David Kerr
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2003 [Full text]

Re: Go the whole Hog

Susana Askew
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2003 [Full text]

Share and share I like

Brian K Saxby
bmj.com, 13 Sep 2003 [Full text]

Clear Presentation of Basic Statistics

Albert J. Starshak
bmj.com, 14 Sep 2003 [Full text]

For love not money.

Richard Piper
bmj.com, 17 Sep 2003 [Full text]

What will happen to my links to BMJ.COM?

Stephen D. Simon
bmj.com, 10 Oct 2003 [Full text]

Another year

John Hopkins
bmj.com, 7 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Own goal of greed

Alexander J N Jablanczy, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2003 [Full text]

what do we pay for

Alex J Jablanczy, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Unfortunate Decision

Jaiganesh Viswambharan
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Charging for access

Michele C Harms
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2003 [Full text]

Amazing

Jose Pinto
bmj.com, 5 Dec 2003 [Full text]

The Drive Towards 'Data-driven Medicine'

Jonathan D. Wren, et al.
bmj.com, 11 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Mesothelioma

Lee A Murphy
bmj.com, 10 Feb 2004 [Full text]

Pay to Play

Belynda Ramsay
bmj.com, 2 Mar 2004 [Full text]

What a shame

adrienne jj garner
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Charges for access to site

John D Baines
bmj.com, 24 Mar 2004 [Full text]

eBMJ is not just read by doctors.!

James G. Allison
bmj.com, 25 Mar 2004 [Full text]

falls in older adults

Stephen Benedict FitzGerald
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Why become monetary?

Clayton Petty
bmj.com, 27 Apr 2004 [Full text]

Other options

Robert Howells
bmj.com, 19 May 2004 [Full text]

Mexico needs BMJ free access.

Martha K. Jalomo
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2004 [Full text]