Letters
Electronic patient records in primary care
BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7415.622-b (Published 11 September 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:622
Study has serious flaw
- N T Shaw, research scientist (nshaw@cw.bc.ca)
- Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, E414A—4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 3V4
EDITOR—There is a serious flaw in the design of the study by Hippisley-Cox et al on electronic patient records in primary care.1 The authors say that they intended to differentiate between manual (all records kept on paper) and combination (part electronic and part paper record keeping) but actually differentiated between paperless (electronic) …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.