Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327 (27 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.0-b
Sensitivity and specificity are common and seemingly simple conventionsso why are they so hard to grasp? Loong (p 716) tackles this conundrum by offering a visual approach to understanding the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of tests. Emphasising the importance of applying the right side of the brain, he uses a real clinical example to illustrate the distinctions and relationships between these concepts. Contrary to usual belief, Loong says that high sensitivity, which implies a test is effective at correctly identifying people who have the disease, is not necessarily a good thing. In addition, the positive and negative predictive values of tests are not fixed, but change if the prevalence of disease changes.
|
|
The perfect test
|
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+