Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:721-724 (27 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.721
Roger Hart, UK subspecialist in reproductive medicine and senior lecturer in obstetrics and gynaecology, fellow of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
university of Western Australia school of women's and infant's health, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
|
|
Unexplained subfertility can be a frustrating diagnosis for any couple trying to conceive
|
Diagnosis of unexplained subfertility
Unexplained subfertility is a diagnosis of exclusion. Up to 25% of patients who present for investigation in a reproductive medicine clinic are diagnosed with unexplained fertility. The diagnosis is usually made after investigations show normal semen parameters, ovulatory concentrations of serum progesterone in the mid-luteal phase, tubal patency, and a normal uterine cavity.
A frustrating diagnosis for patients
It is important to emphasise to couples with a diagnosis of unexplained subfertility that they have only had essential, simple fertility tests that do not always assess function. For example, despite showing tubal patency, normal transport of eggs and sperm in tubes has not been evaluated as no test for this is available. Although a woman may have an ovulatory concentration of serum progesterone and this indicates formation of a corpus luteum, it does not necessarily mean that an egg has been released nor that an egg has been picked up in the fallopian tubes. Even for women who ovulate, there is no information about oocyte quality and consequent embryo quality after fertilisation. Despite normal semen parameters, the sperm may fail one of the steps needed to fertilise the oocyte. Some or all of these potential causes of infertility may be avoided by using intrauterine insemination with superovulation, in vitro fertilisation, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
|
Should further tests be done?
Further tests can be done but they seldom alter management. The "postcoital" test should no longer be done routinely as it is unreliable and seldom alters management.1 What couples want is not so much to find out "what is wrong," but "what can be done for us." Hence, a pragmatic approach to their treatment should be taken.
Treatment options
"Expectant" management
The decision as to when it is appropriate to treat a couple for unexplained subfertility or to wait for spontaneous pregnancy is dictated largely by duration of subfertility, the woman's age, and the couple's wishes. A woman over 35 should be advised to start treatment earlier than a younger woman.
|
|
Superovulation and intrauterine insemination
Intrauterine insemination with superovulation is favoured as the treatment of choice for unexplained subfertility, although if the woman is over 37 years she may be advised to proceed directly to in vitro fertilisation. Intrauterine insemination is less invasive and cheaper than in vitro fertilisation and can achieve pregnancy rates of about 10-17% each cycle, with 85% of conceptions occurring within the first four cycles.2 It may be appropriate for couples to have up to six cycles of intrauterine insemination before stopping this treatment and moving on to in vitro fertilisation. The point at which the treatment is stopped will depend on the woman's age, the duration of subfertility, and local funding policies.
|
Endometriosis
Endometriosis is present in 20-40% of women who complain of subfertility, although it can be found in 5% of fertile women. Mild endometriosis that is not associated with adhesions and tubal defects may be associated with protracted infertility in some women but not others, and it is unclear why. Postulated explanations include intraperitoneal inflammation, immunological factors, unruptured luteinised follicles, and an increase in the rate of miscarriage.
Endometriosis should be suspected when there is dyspareunia, severe dysmenorrhoea, or unexplained abdominal pain, although the symptoms experienced are a poor indicator of the severity of disease. Pelvic examination may show tenderness, nodules of endometriosis on the uterosacral ligaments, or an enlarged ovary, which may be secondary to an ovarian endometrioma. The diagnosis of endometriosis is generally confirmed by laparoscopy. Preoperative ultrasonography is helpful to diagnose the likely cause of a tender and enlarged ovary.
|
Treatment options
Drug treatment to control the symptoms of endometriosis is usually counterproductive to the immediate fertility prospects for a couple. Although some drugs are effective in suppressing deposits of the disease during the course of treatment, most prevent the woman conceiving (for example, gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues, sequential oral contraception). The woman may even be advised not to attempt to conceive while taking certain drugs (for example, danazol), thereby prolonging the period of subfertility, and with little or no chance of improving fecundity after treatment. Thus, after a period of infertility where endometriosis is present, the choice of approach is surgery or assisted conception.
|
Where endometriosis is minimal without tubal damage, intrauterine insemination with superovulation may be a reasonable option. For minimal or mild endometriosis, surgical ablation using laparoscopic laser treatment, bipolar coagulation of endometriotic deposits, or excision of the deposits has been shown to be more effective than expectant management.3 For severe disease the most cost effective management is in vitro fertilisation.
|
|
Mild pelvic endometriosis seen at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy. Arrows show typical endometrioic deposits
|
|
|
Magnetic resonance scan showing a bright endometrioma (A) with a dependent clot. The arrows show small intramural fibroids
|
Rarely, women will present because they can feel a lump or a "pelvic fullness" caused by the size of the fibroids. More often they present with menorrhagia or subfertility. Fibroids are more likely to reduce the chance of an embryo implanting if the fibroid is intracavity.
|
|
Uterus containing multiple fibroids, which may interfere with fertility even after surgical myomectomy because of distortion of the uterus
|
Fibroids are estimated to have a detrimental effect on fertility in up to 10% of cases. They are also associated with an increased risk of miscarriage in women who conceive and half the live birth rate in in vitro fertilisation cycles.4 Apart from the mass effect, the precise mechanism by which fibroids may cause subfertility is unknown.
|
|
Intracavity fibroid seen by hysteroscopy
|
Medical management
The size of fibroids can be reduced, albeit temporarily, by administration of superactive gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues (for example, goserelin, buserelin, nafarelin). The expected reduction in size can be around 30% after four months' use. However, when the fibroids are again exposed to the restored oestrogen-rich environment, they will continue to grow. Consequently a surgical approach is a more realistic alternative. Laparoscopic myomectomy may be suitable for smaller subserosal or intramural fibroids. However, there is still a risk of rupture during a subsequent labour. 5
Surgical management
If the fibroids are mainly intracavity (submucosal), they can be resected easily hysteroscopically with good long term results for fertility and the treatment of menorrhagia.
|
|
Hysteroscopic resection of an intracavity fibroid, with part of the diathermy cutting loop visible
|
However, if the fibroids are intramural, an abdominal procedure (laparotomy or laparoscopic myomectomy) is needed. Gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues should be used before surgery to shrink the fibroid, to make the surgery less vascular, and often to allow improvement in haemoglobin concentration.
Myolysisthe thermal destruction of fibroids using a laser fibreis not recommended for women who want to remain fertile. Myolysis carries the risk of adhesion formation and rupture. The success rate of a subsequent spontaneous conception after a hysteroscopic, abdominal, or a laparoscopic myomectomy is about 60% if infertility was the sole reason for the surgery.6
|
Fibroid embolisation
Bilateral uterine artery embolisation (fibroid embolisation) is a new technique that has gained some favour in the treatment of fibroids. However, relatively few successful pregnancies have been reported, and there is a risk of hysterectomy because of sepsis of necrotic fibroids. The joint report of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of Radiologists does not recommend fibroid embolisation for infertile women until more is known about outcome.7
|
Fibroids and in vitro fertilisation
In women about to begin a course of in vitro fertilisation treatment, there is evidence that intramural fibroids reduce the chance of treatment success because they decrease the implantation potential of an embryo. Evidence also exists that the incidence of miscarriage may be increased in women with an intramural fibroid having in vitro fertilisation treatment. However, no randomised trials show whether myomectomy done on these women will increase their chances of conception.
|
|
Competing interests: None declared.
The photograph of a couple in bed is from Elinor Carucci/Photonica. The figure showing the cumulative birth rate and prognostic influence of history uses data from Collins JA et al. Fertil Steril 1995;64: 22-8[ISI][Medline]. The photograph of an endometrioic cyst taken at laparoscopy is reproduced with permission of Dr D A Hill, Florida hospital family practice residency, Orlando, Florida. The magnetic resonance scan showing the bright endometrioma is reproduced with permission of B Cooper, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia. The figures showing fibroid embolisation are adapted courtesy of Dr J Spies, Georgetown University Medical Center, Maryland.
Read all Rapid Responses