Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:E203 (4 October), doi:10.1136/bmjusa.03030004 (published 12 April 2003)
Following is an edited excerpt from one of the Rapid Responses generated by this article, which can be read in their entirety at http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/326/7379/4Editor
From BMJ USA 2003;Mar:132
Jones and colleagues provide compelling arguments for a review of the contraindications to metformin use. However, it is difficult to understand the rationale behind their advocacy of serum creatinine concentration in determining the appropriateness of metformin. Creatinine clearance is a much better objective assessment of renal function, and it reduces the arbitrary nature of the cutoff point for renal failure described by Jones et al. It also allows some guidance for metformin use in elderly patients, some of whom may have significant renal impairment but a serum creatinine concentration within the normal range. Recent Australian guidelines on the use of oral hypoglycemic agents employ creatinine clearance as a measure of renal function in determining an appropriate dose of metformin. These guidelines present a practical alternative to the view of Jones et al that the term "renal impairment" is vague and unhelpful.
Andrew F Orange, pharmacist facilitator
Manawatu Independent Practice Association, Palmerston North, New Zealand andrew_orange{at}man.rnzcgp.org.nz
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+