Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:E78 (4 October), doi:10.1136/bmjusa.01110004 (published 4 September 2002)
This article originally appeared in BMJ USA
As of November 13, five rapid responses had been posted on bmj.com in response to the paper by Wyatt et al, along with several replies from the investigators. One rapid response is reproduced below; the others can be found at http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/323/7316/776.EDITOR
This article originally appeared in BMJ USA
EditorAs a nurse-midwife, I routinely perform gynecologic exams. Through my own personal struggle with one particularly common symptom of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), cyclic mastalgia, I have discovered that topically applied micronized progesterone cream is highly effective for myself and for my patients who suffer from this condition. In my clinical experience, it is equally effective for peri-menopausal cyclic mastalgia.
I find it perplexing that topical treatment is apparently effective (at least in my clinical practice) when the literature on progesterone supplementation clearly suggests no positive effect on PMS. I would suggest a study exploring the topical route of supplementation for PMS before abandoning a possible treatment for a common disorder for which we have so few acceptable treatments.
In replyTo our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has assessed the use of topical progesterone for cyclic mastalgia, so we can only comment that the treatment remains of unknown effectiveness.
Samantha McCormick, private practice
LaSalle, Illinois, USA otissam{at}aol.com
Paul Dimmock, research fellow
Katrina Wyatt, lecturer
Shaughn O'Brien, head of academic obstetrics and gynaecology
Keele University and North Staffordshire Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK oga03{at}keele.ac.uk