BMJ  2004;329 (3 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.0-d

Results of clinical trials are not generalisable

The selection process for participation in clinical trials means that participants may not represent average patients, and that extrapolating data can be misleading. Dieppe and colleagues (p 31) reviewed trials on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis and compared the participant profile to information from the medicine monitoring database on 131 410 patients taking the drugs in Scotland. People at risk of adverse effects, minority groups, and older people were often excluded from trials. Drugs tend to be used for a wider range of indications than those for which they are trialed, and the harms observed in practice are different from those reported in trials. Databases that link prescribing to hospital data and other health records are needed to assess the relative benefits and harms of drugs, say the authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Balancing benefits and harms: the example of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Paul Dieppe, Christopher Bartlett, Peter Davey, Lesley Doyal, and Shah Ebrahim
BMJ 2004 329: 31-34. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview